Have TQM organisations adjusted their performance management (appraisal) systems? A study of UK-based TQM-driven organisations

J. Gennard, E. Soltani, R.B. Van Der Meer, T.M. Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reports findings from a survey designed to measure the consistency and congruity of HR performance evaluation systems with quality management precepts in UK-based quality-focused organisations. Twelve a priori features of HR performance evaluation were used to measure HR performance evaluation systems. Since a fundamental reason for the purported incompatibility between TQM and HR performance evaluation is the assertion that most variance in performance is caused by system factors, and due to indications from various sources that HR performance evaluation focuses managerial attention on person factors rather than on system factors, the survey was also developed with the intention of discovering the extent to which these system criteria are used for measuring employee performance. The findings confirm that most HR performance evaluation systems fail to meet quality management expectations and contradict TQM assumptions about individual and system performance.
LanguageEnglish
Pages403-417
Number of pages14
JournalTQM Magazine
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Performance Management
Total quality management
Quality management
Performance Evaluation
Quality Management
Personnel
Assertion
Performance evaluation
Performance management
System Performance
Person
Evaluation system
Factors

Keywords

  • human resource management
  • performance appraisal
  • total quality management
  • performance management

Cite this

@article{bc64127a84064e8abd3fe6672307a5f5,
title = "Have TQM organisations adjusted their performance management (appraisal) systems? A study of UK-based TQM-driven organisations",
abstract = "Reports findings from a survey designed to measure the consistency and congruity of HR performance evaluation systems with quality management precepts in UK-based quality-focused organisations. Twelve a priori features of HR performance evaluation were used to measure HR performance evaluation systems. Since a fundamental reason for the purported incompatibility between TQM and HR performance evaluation is the assertion that most variance in performance is caused by system factors, and due to indications from various sources that HR performance evaluation focuses managerial attention on person factors rather than on system factors, the survey was also developed with the intention of discovering the extent to which these system criteria are used for measuring employee performance. The findings confirm that most HR performance evaluation systems fail to meet quality management expectations and contradict TQM assumptions about individual and system performance.",
keywords = "human resource management, performance appraisal, total quality management, performance management",
author = "J. Gennard and E. Soltani and {Van Der Meer}, R.B. and T.M. Williams",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1108/09544780410563329",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "403--417",
journal = "TQM Magazine",
issn = "0954-478X",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "6",

}

Have TQM organisations adjusted their performance management (appraisal) systems? A study of UK-based TQM-driven organisations. / Gennard, J.; Soltani, E.; Van Der Meer, R.B.; Williams, T.M.

In: TQM Magazine, Vol. 16, No. 6, 2004, p. 403-417.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Have TQM organisations adjusted their performance management (appraisal) systems? A study of UK-based TQM-driven organisations

AU - Gennard, J.

AU - Soltani, E.

AU - Van Der Meer, R.B.

AU - Williams, T.M.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Reports findings from a survey designed to measure the consistency and congruity of HR performance evaluation systems with quality management precepts in UK-based quality-focused organisations. Twelve a priori features of HR performance evaluation were used to measure HR performance evaluation systems. Since a fundamental reason for the purported incompatibility between TQM and HR performance evaluation is the assertion that most variance in performance is caused by system factors, and due to indications from various sources that HR performance evaluation focuses managerial attention on person factors rather than on system factors, the survey was also developed with the intention of discovering the extent to which these system criteria are used for measuring employee performance. The findings confirm that most HR performance evaluation systems fail to meet quality management expectations and contradict TQM assumptions about individual and system performance.

AB - Reports findings from a survey designed to measure the consistency and congruity of HR performance evaluation systems with quality management precepts in UK-based quality-focused organisations. Twelve a priori features of HR performance evaluation were used to measure HR performance evaluation systems. Since a fundamental reason for the purported incompatibility between TQM and HR performance evaluation is the assertion that most variance in performance is caused by system factors, and due to indications from various sources that HR performance evaluation focuses managerial attention on person factors rather than on system factors, the survey was also developed with the intention of discovering the extent to which these system criteria are used for measuring employee performance. The findings confirm that most HR performance evaluation systems fail to meet quality management expectations and contradict TQM assumptions about individual and system performance.

KW - human resource management

KW - performance appraisal

KW - total quality management

KW - performance management

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09544780410563329

U2 - 10.1108/09544780410563329

DO - 10.1108/09544780410563329

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 403

EP - 417

JO - TQM Magazine

T2 - TQM Magazine

JF - TQM Magazine

SN - 0954-478X

IS - 6

ER -