Halfway to infinity: systems theorizing for the practitioners

Colin Eden, Robert Graham

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)


    Systems theory is seen as stressing the rational mind (what we think about) to the detriment of the transactional mind (which we use day-to-day). This stress can be harmful to practitioners who must work in practical, transactional worlds. Rather than attempting to be infinitely rational, we propose a position halfway to infinity-rational and transactional combined. Much of systems theory is pleasing to hear and difficult to contradict. Much of the theory is about design of systems, but it is in the often non-rational process of implementation that the real system emerges. Also the theory tells us about systems but not how to identify the `correct' system that our O.R. efforts are impacting. The theory also tells about complexity, but the tools presented for handling it do not seem related to the theory. The halfway position is to build a body of contingent theory from reflection on experience, using systems theory as a framework for thinking rather than a guide for action.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)723-728
    Number of pages6
    JournalJournal of the Operational Research Society
    Issue number8
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 1983


    • halfway
    • infinity
    • systems theorizing
    • practitioners
    • transactional mind
    • framework for thinking
    • systems theory
    • rational mind


    Dive into the research topics of 'Halfway to infinity: systems theorizing for the practitioners'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this