Halfway to infinity: systems theorizing for the practitioners

Colin Eden, Robert Graham

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Systems theory is seen as stressing the rational mind (what we think about) to the detriment of the transactional mind (which we use day-to-day). This stress can be harmful to practitioners who must work in practical, transactional worlds. Rather than attempting to be infinitely rational, we propose a position halfway to infinity-rational and transactional combined. Much of systems theory is pleasing to hear and difficult to contradict. Much of the theory is about design of systems, but it is in the often non-rational process of implementation that the real system emerges. Also the theory tells us about systems but not how to identify the `correct' system that our O.R. efforts are impacting. The theory also tells about complexity, but the tools presented for handling it do not seem related to the theory. The halfway position is to build a body of contingent theory from reflection on experience, using systems theory as a framework for thinking rather than a guide for action.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages723-728
    Number of pages6
    JournalJournal of the Operational Research Society
    Volume34
    Issue number8
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 1983

    Fingerprint

    System theory
    Theorizing
    Systems theory

    Keywords

    • halfway
    • infinity
    • systems theorizing
    • practitioners
    • transactional mind
    • framework for thinking
    • systems theory
    • rational mind

    Cite this

    @article{dd0f1c24bc364bed92078b2087f5a8cc,
    title = "Halfway to infinity: systems theorizing for the practitioners",
    abstract = "Systems theory is seen as stressing the rational mind (what we think about) to the detriment of the transactional mind (which we use day-to-day). This stress can be harmful to practitioners who must work in practical, transactional worlds. Rather than attempting to be infinitely rational, we propose a position halfway to infinity-rational and transactional combined. Much of systems theory is pleasing to hear and difficult to contradict. Much of the theory is about design of systems, but it is in the often non-rational process of implementation that the real system emerges. Also the theory tells us about systems but not how to identify the `correct' system that our O.R. efforts are impacting. The theory also tells about complexity, but the tools presented for handling it do not seem related to the theory. The halfway position is to build a body of contingent theory from reflection on experience, using systems theory as a framework for thinking rather than a guide for action.",
    keywords = "halfway, infinity, systems theorizing , practitioners, transactional mind, framework for thinking, systems theory, rational mind",
    author = "Colin Eden and Robert Graham",
    year = "1983",
    month = "8",
    language = "English",
    volume = "34",
    pages = "723--728",
    journal = "Journal of Operational Research Society",
    issn = "0160-5682",
    number = "8",

    }

    Halfway to infinity : systems theorizing for the practitioners. / Eden, Colin; Graham, Robert.

    In: Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 34, No. 8, 08.1983, p. 723-728.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Halfway to infinity

    T2 - Journal of Operational Research Society

    AU - Eden, Colin

    AU - Graham, Robert

    PY - 1983/8

    Y1 - 1983/8

    N2 - Systems theory is seen as stressing the rational mind (what we think about) to the detriment of the transactional mind (which we use day-to-day). This stress can be harmful to practitioners who must work in practical, transactional worlds. Rather than attempting to be infinitely rational, we propose a position halfway to infinity-rational and transactional combined. Much of systems theory is pleasing to hear and difficult to contradict. Much of the theory is about design of systems, but it is in the often non-rational process of implementation that the real system emerges. Also the theory tells us about systems but not how to identify the `correct' system that our O.R. efforts are impacting. The theory also tells about complexity, but the tools presented for handling it do not seem related to the theory. The halfway position is to build a body of contingent theory from reflection on experience, using systems theory as a framework for thinking rather than a guide for action.

    AB - Systems theory is seen as stressing the rational mind (what we think about) to the detriment of the transactional mind (which we use day-to-day). This stress can be harmful to practitioners who must work in practical, transactional worlds. Rather than attempting to be infinitely rational, we propose a position halfway to infinity-rational and transactional combined. Much of systems theory is pleasing to hear and difficult to contradict. Much of the theory is about design of systems, but it is in the often non-rational process of implementation that the real system emerges. Also the theory tells us about systems but not how to identify the `correct' system that our O.R. efforts are impacting. The theory also tells about complexity, but the tools presented for handling it do not seem related to the theory. The halfway position is to build a body of contingent theory from reflection on experience, using systems theory as a framework for thinking rather than a guide for action.

    KW - halfway

    KW - infinity

    KW - systems theorizing

    KW - practitioners

    KW - transactional mind

    KW - framework for thinking

    KW - systems theory

    KW - rational mind

    UR - http://www.jstor.org/stable/2581706

    M3 - Article

    VL - 34

    SP - 723

    EP - 728

    JO - Journal of Operational Research Society

    JF - Journal of Operational Research Society

    SN - 0160-5682

    IS - 8

    ER -