Abstract
| Language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of Testing and Evaluation |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 8 May 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 30 Jul 2018 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- soil stabilization
- ground improvement
- microbial activity
- ureolytic activity
- urea hydrolysis
- calcite precipitation
Cite this
}
Guidance for investigating calcite precipitation by urea hydrolysis for geomaterials. / Shashank, B.S.; Minto, James M.; Singh, Devendra Narain; El Mountassir, Grainne; Knapp, Charles W.
In: Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 46, No. 4, 30.07.2018.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Guidance for investigating calcite precipitation by urea hydrolysis for geomaterials
AU - Shashank, B.S.
AU - Minto, James M.
AU - Singh, Devendra Narain
AU - El Mountassir, Grainne
AU - Knapp, Charles W.
PY - 2018/7/30
Y1 - 2018/7/30
N2 - Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) is a sustainable method of stabilizing (i.e., cementing) loose sandy deposits and/or to create an impervious barrier within the soil mass. MICP can occur through various biochemical pathways, among which ‘Urea Hydrolysis (UH)’ is considered to be the most efficient method of biochemically inducing calcite precipitation. To date, the geotechnical engineering community investigating MICP has tended to focus on the hydro-mechanical behaviour of the end product, i.e. MICP cemented sands; however, many biochemical factors that affect reaction-rate kinetics and MICP outcome have been understudied or neglected. This study investigated the kinetics of UH and compared different sources of urease enzyme: those microbially cultivated in the laboratory (i.e., Sporosarcina pasteurii) and those extracted from plants (i.e., Jack bean meal), to investigate the influence of urea concentration, buffer capacity, and cell harvesting method on UH. Through this study, an attempt has been made to arrive at an optimal concentration of urea, under the influence of the above mentioned parameters along with the buffering action of the soil, on urea hydrolysis. These results have implications towards optimising MICP and, in particular, for upscaling these methods to in-situ applications.
AB - Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) is a sustainable method of stabilizing (i.e., cementing) loose sandy deposits and/or to create an impervious barrier within the soil mass. MICP can occur through various biochemical pathways, among which ‘Urea Hydrolysis (UH)’ is considered to be the most efficient method of biochemically inducing calcite precipitation. To date, the geotechnical engineering community investigating MICP has tended to focus on the hydro-mechanical behaviour of the end product, i.e. MICP cemented sands; however, many biochemical factors that affect reaction-rate kinetics and MICP outcome have been understudied or neglected. This study investigated the kinetics of UH and compared different sources of urease enzyme: those microbially cultivated in the laboratory (i.e., Sporosarcina pasteurii) and those extracted from plants (i.e., Jack bean meal), to investigate the influence of urea concentration, buffer capacity, and cell harvesting method on UH. Through this study, an attempt has been made to arrive at an optimal concentration of urea, under the influence of the above mentioned parameters along with the buffering action of the soil, on urea hydrolysis. These results have implications towards optimising MICP and, in particular, for upscaling these methods to in-situ applications.
KW - soil stabilization
KW - ground improvement
KW - microbial activity
KW - ureolytic activity
KW - urea hydrolysis
KW - calcite precipitation
UR - https://compass.astm.org/journals/jote/index.html
U2 - 10.1520/JTE20170122
DO - 10.1520/JTE20170122
M3 - Article
VL - 46
JO - Journal of Testing and Evaluation
T2 - Journal of Testing and Evaluation
JF - Journal of Testing and Evaluation
SN - 0090-3973
IS - 4
ER -