Guidance for investigating calcite precipitation by urea hydrolysis for geomaterials

B.S. Shashank, James M. Minto, Devendra Narain Singh, Grainne El Mountassir, Charles W. Knapp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) is a sustainable method of stabilizing (i.e., cementing) loose sandy deposits and/or to create an impervious barrier within the soil mass. MICP can occur through various biochemical pathways, among which ‘Urea Hydrolysis (UH)’ is considered to be the most efficient method of biochemically inducing calcite precipitation. To date, the geotechnical engineering community investigating MICP has tended to focus on the hydro-mechanical behaviour of the end product, i.e. MICP cemented sands; however, many biochemical factors that affect reaction-rate kinetics and MICP outcome have been understudied or neglected. This study investigated the kinetics of UH and compared different sources of urease enzyme: those microbially cultivated in the laboratory (i.e., Sporosarcina pasteurii) and those extracted from plants (i.e., Jack bean meal), to investigate the influence of urea concentration, buffer capacity, and cell harvesting method on UH. Through this study, an attempt has been made to arrive at an optimal concentration of urea, under the influence of the above mentioned parameters along with the buffering action of the soil, on urea hydrolysis. These results have implications towards optimising MICP and, in particular, for upscaling these methods to in-situ applications.
LanguageEnglish
JournalJournal of Testing and Evaluation
Volume46
Issue number4
Early online date8 May 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

Calcium Carbonate
Calcite
Urea
Hydrolysis
Soils
Geotechnical engineering
Kinetics
Jacks
Urease
Reaction rates
Buffers
Sand
Deposits
Enzymes

Keywords

  • soil stabilization
  • ground improvement
  • microbial activity
  • ureolytic activity
  • urea hydrolysis
  • calcite precipitation

Cite this

@article{2e2b30147bbe43e0a72574c64efd1771,
title = "Guidance for investigating calcite precipitation by urea hydrolysis for geomaterials",
abstract = "Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) is a sustainable method of stabilizing (i.e., cementing) loose sandy deposits and/or to create an impervious barrier within the soil mass. MICP can occur through various biochemical pathways, among which ‘Urea Hydrolysis (UH)’ is considered to be the most efficient method of biochemically inducing calcite precipitation. To date, the geotechnical engineering community investigating MICP has tended to focus on the hydro-mechanical behaviour of the end product, i.e. MICP cemented sands; however, many biochemical factors that affect reaction-rate kinetics and MICP outcome have been understudied or neglected. This study investigated the kinetics of UH and compared different sources of urease enzyme: those microbially cultivated in the laboratory (i.e., Sporosarcina pasteurii) and those extracted from plants (i.e., Jack bean meal), to investigate the influence of urea concentration, buffer capacity, and cell harvesting method on UH. Through this study, an attempt has been made to arrive at an optimal concentration of urea, under the influence of the above mentioned parameters along with the buffering action of the soil, on urea hydrolysis. These results have implications towards optimising MICP and, in particular, for upscaling these methods to in-situ applications.",
keywords = "soil stabilization, ground improvement, microbial activity, ureolytic activity, urea hydrolysis, calcite precipitation",
author = "B.S. Shashank and Minto, {James M.} and Singh, {Devendra Narain} and {El Mountassir}, Grainne and Knapp, {Charles W.}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1520/JTE20170122",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
journal = "Journal of Testing and Evaluation",
issn = "0090-3973",
number = "4",

}

Guidance for investigating calcite precipitation by urea hydrolysis for geomaterials. / Shashank, B.S.; Minto, James M.; Singh, Devendra Narain; El Mountassir, Grainne; Knapp, Charles W.

In: Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 46, No. 4, 30.07.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guidance for investigating calcite precipitation by urea hydrolysis for geomaterials

AU - Shashank, B.S.

AU - Minto, James M.

AU - Singh, Devendra Narain

AU - El Mountassir, Grainne

AU - Knapp, Charles W.

PY - 2018/7/30

Y1 - 2018/7/30

N2 - Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) is a sustainable method of stabilizing (i.e., cementing) loose sandy deposits and/or to create an impervious barrier within the soil mass. MICP can occur through various biochemical pathways, among which ‘Urea Hydrolysis (UH)’ is considered to be the most efficient method of biochemically inducing calcite precipitation. To date, the geotechnical engineering community investigating MICP has tended to focus on the hydro-mechanical behaviour of the end product, i.e. MICP cemented sands; however, many biochemical factors that affect reaction-rate kinetics and MICP outcome have been understudied or neglected. This study investigated the kinetics of UH and compared different sources of urease enzyme: those microbially cultivated in the laboratory (i.e., Sporosarcina pasteurii) and those extracted from plants (i.e., Jack bean meal), to investigate the influence of urea concentration, buffer capacity, and cell harvesting method on UH. Through this study, an attempt has been made to arrive at an optimal concentration of urea, under the influence of the above mentioned parameters along with the buffering action of the soil, on urea hydrolysis. These results have implications towards optimising MICP and, in particular, for upscaling these methods to in-situ applications.

AB - Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) is a sustainable method of stabilizing (i.e., cementing) loose sandy deposits and/or to create an impervious barrier within the soil mass. MICP can occur through various biochemical pathways, among which ‘Urea Hydrolysis (UH)’ is considered to be the most efficient method of biochemically inducing calcite precipitation. To date, the geotechnical engineering community investigating MICP has tended to focus on the hydro-mechanical behaviour of the end product, i.e. MICP cemented sands; however, many biochemical factors that affect reaction-rate kinetics and MICP outcome have been understudied or neglected. This study investigated the kinetics of UH and compared different sources of urease enzyme: those microbially cultivated in the laboratory (i.e., Sporosarcina pasteurii) and those extracted from plants (i.e., Jack bean meal), to investigate the influence of urea concentration, buffer capacity, and cell harvesting method on UH. Through this study, an attempt has been made to arrive at an optimal concentration of urea, under the influence of the above mentioned parameters along with the buffering action of the soil, on urea hydrolysis. These results have implications towards optimising MICP and, in particular, for upscaling these methods to in-situ applications.

KW - soil stabilization

KW - ground improvement

KW - microbial activity

KW - ureolytic activity

KW - urea hydrolysis

KW - calcite precipitation

UR - https://compass.astm.org/journals/jote/index.html

U2 - 10.1520/JTE20170122

DO - 10.1520/JTE20170122

M3 - Article

VL - 46

JO - Journal of Testing and Evaluation

T2 - Journal of Testing and Evaluation

JF - Journal of Testing and Evaluation

SN - 0090-3973

IS - 4

ER -