Guest Editorial

Mary Neal, Sara Fovargue, Stephen W. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Abstract

It is probably fair to say that academic interest in the role of conscience in healthcare (and specifically, in the phenomenon of conscientious objection (CO)) has never been more intense, as evidenced by the volume of articles (and indeed, special issues) devoted to the topic in recent years. The three of us have contributed to this burgeoning literature, writing separately and together.

This special issue of The New Bioethics marks the mid-point of a project devised and co-managed by us and funded by the Royal Society of Edinburgh’s Research Networks scheme: the Accommodating Conscience Research Network (ACoRN). Our aim in developing this multidisciplinary network of academics from a range of disciplines, practitioners, and representatives of professional bodies, is to carve out intellectual space within which to begin exploring conscience/CO in healthcare from a broadly supportive perspective. Our sense, as participants in academic debates about conscience, is that although the literature contains many rich insights and fascinating discussions, some of the most interesting questions about conscience are being overshadowed by the loudest and most polarised disagreement over whether there is any legitimate role for CO in healthcare at all. This is despite the fact that it seems to us that most contributors adopt positions that are hospitable to the accommodation of CO, at least to some extent and in some circumstances.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)203-206
Number of pages4
JournalThe New Bioethics: A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 9 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

conscience
Delivery of Health Care
Bioethics
bioethics
Research
accommodation
literature

Keywords

  • multidisciplinary network
  • healthcare professionals
  • conscientious objection
  • legal systems

Cite this

Neal, Mary ; Fovargue, Sara ; Smith, Stephen W. / Guest Editorial. In: The New Bioethics: A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body. 2019 ; Vol. 25, No. 3. pp. 203-206.
@article{7341000c0d3d4634b59cef40320f2098,
title = "Guest Editorial",
abstract = "It is probably fair to say that academic interest in the role of conscience in healthcare (and specifically, in the phenomenon of conscientious objection (CO)) has never been more intense, as evidenced by the volume of articles (and indeed, special issues) devoted to the topic in recent years. The three of us have contributed to this burgeoning literature, writing separately and together.This special issue of The New Bioethics marks the mid-point of a project devised and co-managed by us and funded by the Royal Society of Edinburgh’s Research Networks scheme: the Accommodating Conscience Research Network (ACoRN). Our aim in developing this multidisciplinary network of academics from a range of disciplines, practitioners, and representatives of professional bodies, is to carve out intellectual space within which to begin exploring conscience/CO in healthcare from a broadly supportive perspective. Our sense, as participants in academic debates about conscience, is that although the literature contains many rich insights and fascinating discussions, some of the most interesting questions about conscience are being overshadowed by the loudest and most polarised disagreement over whether there is any legitimate role for CO in healthcare at all. This is despite the fact that it seems to us that most contributors adopt positions that are hospitable to the accommodation of CO, at least to some extent and in some circumstances.",
keywords = "multidisciplinary network, healthcare professionals, conscientious objection, legal systems",
author = "Mary Neal and Sara Fovargue and Smith, {Stephen W.}",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1080/20502877.2019.1659485",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "203--206",
journal = "The New Bioethics",
issn = "2050-2877",
number = "3",

}

Guest Editorial. / Neal, Mary; Fovargue, Sara; Smith, Stephen W.

In: The New Bioethics: A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body, Vol. 25, No. 3, 09.09.2019, p. 203-206.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guest Editorial

AU - Neal, Mary

AU - Fovargue, Sara

AU - Smith, Stephen W.

PY - 2019/9/9

Y1 - 2019/9/9

N2 - It is probably fair to say that academic interest in the role of conscience in healthcare (and specifically, in the phenomenon of conscientious objection (CO)) has never been more intense, as evidenced by the volume of articles (and indeed, special issues) devoted to the topic in recent years. The three of us have contributed to this burgeoning literature, writing separately and together.This special issue of The New Bioethics marks the mid-point of a project devised and co-managed by us and funded by the Royal Society of Edinburgh’s Research Networks scheme: the Accommodating Conscience Research Network (ACoRN). Our aim in developing this multidisciplinary network of academics from a range of disciplines, practitioners, and representatives of professional bodies, is to carve out intellectual space within which to begin exploring conscience/CO in healthcare from a broadly supportive perspective. Our sense, as participants in academic debates about conscience, is that although the literature contains many rich insights and fascinating discussions, some of the most interesting questions about conscience are being overshadowed by the loudest and most polarised disagreement over whether there is any legitimate role for CO in healthcare at all. This is despite the fact that it seems to us that most contributors adopt positions that are hospitable to the accommodation of CO, at least to some extent and in some circumstances.

AB - It is probably fair to say that academic interest in the role of conscience in healthcare (and specifically, in the phenomenon of conscientious objection (CO)) has never been more intense, as evidenced by the volume of articles (and indeed, special issues) devoted to the topic in recent years. The three of us have contributed to this burgeoning literature, writing separately and together.This special issue of The New Bioethics marks the mid-point of a project devised and co-managed by us and funded by the Royal Society of Edinburgh’s Research Networks scheme: the Accommodating Conscience Research Network (ACoRN). Our aim in developing this multidisciplinary network of academics from a range of disciplines, practitioners, and representatives of professional bodies, is to carve out intellectual space within which to begin exploring conscience/CO in healthcare from a broadly supportive perspective. Our sense, as participants in academic debates about conscience, is that although the literature contains many rich insights and fascinating discussions, some of the most interesting questions about conscience are being overshadowed by the loudest and most polarised disagreement over whether there is any legitimate role for CO in healthcare at all. This is despite the fact that it seems to us that most contributors adopt positions that are hospitable to the accommodation of CO, at least to some extent and in some circumstances.

KW - multidisciplinary network

KW - healthcare professionals

KW - conscientious objection

KW - legal systems

U2 - 10.1080/20502877.2019.1659485

DO - 10.1080/20502877.2019.1659485

M3 - Editorial

VL - 25

SP - 203

EP - 206

JO - The New Bioethics

JF - The New Bioethics

SN - 2050-2877

IS - 3

ER -