Abstract
The article provides a comparative exploration of New Public Management (NPM) funding models on the non-profit sectors in the UK and Australia, and the implications for services, employment conditions, and worker commitment. A degree of convergence exists around the principles of NPM in the two case studies, creating employment regimes of low pay, casualization, and work intensification. Enhanced vulnerability to pay cuts in the UK, and insecurity in Australia are explained by national differences in exposure to recession, industrial relations institutions, and competition, leading to diminishing worker commitment and raising important concerns for policy-makers as benefits gained from outsourcing to non-profits are eroded.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 582-598 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Public Administration |
| Volume | 92 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 20 Mar 2014 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2014 |
Keywords
- new public management funding
- employment conditions
- worker commitment
- work organisation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Government funding, employment conditions, and work organization in non-profit community services: a comparative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver