Government expenditure and revenue in Scotland: accounting for the fiscal deficit in 1996-7

Arthur Midwinter

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The annual publication of the Government Expenditure and Revenue in Scotland (GERS) Report is becoming a set-piece political confrontation between the Scottish National Party and die government of the day. This statistical exercise was dubbed 'Forsyth's fiddled figures' under the Conservatives, and as 'bogus' under Labour. This year, the SNP described the report as a 'thoroughly discredited exercise, that is political and subjective, but presented as factual and objective', and criticised 'the treatment of European funding, the underestimation of income tax receipts in Scotland, and substantial changes to the allocation of identifiable expenditure'. These criticisms shall be reviewed below, after setting out the fiscal arithmetic.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages59-62
    Number of pages4
    JournalQuarterly Economic Commentary
    Volume24
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 1998

    Fingerprint

    Government expenditure
    Fiscal deficit
    Government revenue
    Scotland
    Exercise
    Labor
    Funding
    Income tax
    Expenditure
    Criticism
    Government
    Fiscal

    Keywords

    • Government Expenditure and Revenue in Scotland (GERS)
    • Scotland
    • public funding
    • public expenditure
    • fiscal deficit

    Cite this

    @article{eb3b15e5f33041aea08c999f9fe9bce7,
    title = "Government expenditure and revenue in Scotland: accounting for the fiscal deficit in 1996-7",
    abstract = "The annual publication of the Government Expenditure and Revenue in Scotland (GERS) Report is becoming a set-piece political confrontation between the Scottish National Party and die government of the day. This statistical exercise was dubbed 'Forsyth's fiddled figures' under the Conservatives, and as 'bogus' under Labour. This year, the SNP described the report as a 'thoroughly discredited exercise, that is political and subjective, but presented as factual and objective', and criticised 'the treatment of European funding, the underestimation of income tax receipts in Scotland, and substantial changes to the allocation of identifiable expenditure'. These criticisms shall be reviewed below, after setting out the fiscal arithmetic.",
    keywords = "Government Expenditure and Revenue in Scotland (GERS), Scotland, public funding, public expenditure, fiscal deficit",
    author = "Arthur Midwinter",
    year = "1998",
    month = "12",
    language = "English",
    volume = "24",
    pages = "59--62",
    journal = "Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary",
    issn = "2046-5378",
    publisher = "University of Strathclyde",
    number = "1",

    }

    Government expenditure and revenue in Scotland : accounting for the fiscal deficit in 1996-7. / Midwinter, Arthur.

    In: Quarterly Economic Commentary, Vol. 24, No. 1, 12.1998, p. 59-62.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Government expenditure and revenue in Scotland

    T2 - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

    AU - Midwinter, Arthur

    PY - 1998/12

    Y1 - 1998/12

    N2 - The annual publication of the Government Expenditure and Revenue in Scotland (GERS) Report is becoming a set-piece political confrontation between the Scottish National Party and die government of the day. This statistical exercise was dubbed 'Forsyth's fiddled figures' under the Conservatives, and as 'bogus' under Labour. This year, the SNP described the report as a 'thoroughly discredited exercise, that is political and subjective, but presented as factual and objective', and criticised 'the treatment of European funding, the underestimation of income tax receipts in Scotland, and substantial changes to the allocation of identifiable expenditure'. These criticisms shall be reviewed below, after setting out the fiscal arithmetic.

    AB - The annual publication of the Government Expenditure and Revenue in Scotland (GERS) Report is becoming a set-piece political confrontation between the Scottish National Party and die government of the day. This statistical exercise was dubbed 'Forsyth's fiddled figures' under the Conservatives, and as 'bogus' under Labour. This year, the SNP described the report as a 'thoroughly discredited exercise, that is political and subjective, but presented as factual and objective', and criticised 'the treatment of European funding, the underestimation of income tax receipts in Scotland, and substantial changes to the allocation of identifiable expenditure'. These criticisms shall be reviewed below, after setting out the fiscal arithmetic.

    KW - Government Expenditure and Revenue in Scotland (GERS)

    KW - Scotland

    KW - public funding

    KW - public expenditure

    KW - fiscal deficit

    UR - http://www.strath.ac.uk/frasercommentary/

    UR - http://www.strath.ac.uk/fraser/

    M3 - Article

    VL - 24

    SP - 59

    EP - 62

    JO - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

    JF - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

    SN - 2046-5378

    IS - 1

    ER -