Government expenditure and revenue in Scotland: accounting for the fiscal deficit in 1996-7

Arthur Midwinter

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    41 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The annual publication of the Government Expenditure and Revenue in Scotland (GERS) Report is becoming a set-piece political confrontation between the Scottish National Party and die government of the day. This statistical exercise was dubbed 'Forsyth's fiddled figures' under the Conservatives, and as 'bogus' under Labour. This year, the SNP described the report as a 'thoroughly discredited exercise, that is political and subjective, but presented as factual and objective', and criticised 'the treatment of European funding, the underestimation of income tax receipts in Scotland, and substantial changes to the allocation of identifiable expenditure'. These criticisms shall be reviewed below, after setting out the fiscal arithmetic.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)59-62
    Number of pages4
    JournalQuarterly Economic Commentary
    Volume24
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 1998

    Keywords

    • Government Expenditure and Revenue in Scotland (GERS)
    • Scotland
    • public funding
    • public expenditure
    • fiscal deficit

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Government expenditure and revenue in Scotland: accounting for the fiscal deficit in 1996-7'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this