Governance tools for board members: adapting strategy maps and balanced scorecards for directorial action

Kizhekepat Sankaran, Srijayan Iyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The accountability of members of the board of directors of publicly traded companies has increased over years. Corresponding to these developments, there has been an inadequate advancement of tools and frameworks to help directorial functioning. This paper provides an argument for design of the Balanced Scorecard and Strategy Maps made available to the directors as a means of influencing, monitoring, controlling and assisting managerial action.
This paper examines how the Balanced Scorecard and Strategy Maps could be modified and used for this purpose. The paper suggests incorporating Balanced Scorecards in the Internal Process perspective, ‘internal’ implying here not just ‘internal to the firm’, but also ‘internal to the inter-organizational system’. We recommend that other such factors be introduced separately under a new ‘perspective’ depending upon what the board wants to emphasize without creating any unwieldy proliferation of measures. Tracking the Strategy Map over time by the board of directors is a way for the board to take responsibility for the firm’s performance. The paper makes a distinction between action variables and monitoring variables. Monitoring variables are further divided on the basis of two considerations: a) whether results have been met or not and b) whether causative factors have met the expected levels of performance or not. Based on directorial responsibilities and accountability, we take another look at how the variables could be specified more completely and accurately with directorial recommendations for executives.
LanguageEnglish
Pages141-158
Number of pages18
JournalCurrent Issues of Business and Law
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Strategy map
Governance
Balanced score card
Monitoring
Board of directors
Factors
Accountability
Responsibility
Proliferation
Interorganizational systems
Functioning

Keywords

  • board of directors
  • directorial accountability
  • business judgement rule
  • strategy maps
  • balanced scorecard

Cite this

@article{78330065676546dc993603f49047255e,
title = "Governance tools for board members: adapting strategy maps and balanced scorecards for directorial action",
abstract = "The accountability of members of the board of directors of publicly traded companies has increased over years. Corresponding to these developments, there has been an inadequate advancement of tools and frameworks to help directorial functioning. This paper provides an argument for design of the Balanced Scorecard and Strategy Maps made available to the directors as a means of influencing, monitoring, controlling and assisting managerial action. This paper examines how the Balanced Scorecard and Strategy Maps could be modified and used for this purpose. The paper suggests incorporating Balanced Scorecards in the Internal Process perspective, ‘internal’ implying here not just ‘internal to the firm’, but also ‘internal to the inter-organizational system’. We recommend that other such factors be introduced separately under a new ‘perspective’ depending upon what the board wants to emphasize without creating any unwieldy proliferation of measures. Tracking the Strategy Map over time by the board of directors is a way for the board to take responsibility for the firm’s performance. The paper makes a distinction between action variables and monitoring variables. Monitoring variables are further divided on the basis of two considerations: a) whether results have been met or not and b) whether causative factors have met the expected levels of performance or not. Based on directorial responsibilities and accountability, we take another look at how the variables could be specified more completely and accurately with directorial recommendations for executives.",
keywords = "board of directors, directorial accountability, business judgement rule, strategy maps, balanced scorecard",
author = "Kizhekepat Sankaran and Srijayan Iyer",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.5200/1822-9530.2011.08",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "141--158",
journal = "Current Issues of Business and Law",
issn = "1822-9530",
number = "1",

}

Governance tools for board members : adapting strategy maps and balanced scorecards for directorial action. / Sankaran, Kizhekepat; Iyer, Srijayan.

In: Current Issues of Business and Law, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2011, p. 141-158.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Governance tools for board members

T2 - Current Issues of Business and Law

AU - Sankaran, Kizhekepat

AU - Iyer, Srijayan

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The accountability of members of the board of directors of publicly traded companies has increased over years. Corresponding to these developments, there has been an inadequate advancement of tools and frameworks to help directorial functioning. This paper provides an argument for design of the Balanced Scorecard and Strategy Maps made available to the directors as a means of influencing, monitoring, controlling and assisting managerial action. This paper examines how the Balanced Scorecard and Strategy Maps could be modified and used for this purpose. The paper suggests incorporating Balanced Scorecards in the Internal Process perspective, ‘internal’ implying here not just ‘internal to the firm’, but also ‘internal to the inter-organizational system’. We recommend that other such factors be introduced separately under a new ‘perspective’ depending upon what the board wants to emphasize without creating any unwieldy proliferation of measures. Tracking the Strategy Map over time by the board of directors is a way for the board to take responsibility for the firm’s performance. The paper makes a distinction between action variables and monitoring variables. Monitoring variables are further divided on the basis of two considerations: a) whether results have been met or not and b) whether causative factors have met the expected levels of performance or not. Based on directorial responsibilities and accountability, we take another look at how the variables could be specified more completely and accurately with directorial recommendations for executives.

AB - The accountability of members of the board of directors of publicly traded companies has increased over years. Corresponding to these developments, there has been an inadequate advancement of tools and frameworks to help directorial functioning. This paper provides an argument for design of the Balanced Scorecard and Strategy Maps made available to the directors as a means of influencing, monitoring, controlling and assisting managerial action. This paper examines how the Balanced Scorecard and Strategy Maps could be modified and used for this purpose. The paper suggests incorporating Balanced Scorecards in the Internal Process perspective, ‘internal’ implying here not just ‘internal to the firm’, but also ‘internal to the inter-organizational system’. We recommend that other such factors be introduced separately under a new ‘perspective’ depending upon what the board wants to emphasize without creating any unwieldy proliferation of measures. Tracking the Strategy Map over time by the board of directors is a way for the board to take responsibility for the firm’s performance. The paper makes a distinction between action variables and monitoring variables. Monitoring variables are further divided on the basis of two considerations: a) whether results have been met or not and b) whether causative factors have met the expected levels of performance or not. Based on directorial responsibilities and accountability, we take another look at how the variables could be specified more completely and accurately with directorial recommendations for executives.

KW - board of directors

KW - directorial accountability

KW - business judgement rule

KW - strategy maps

KW - balanced scorecard

UR - http://www.vta.ttvam.eu/index.php/vta/article/view/14

U2 - 10.5200/1822-9530.2011.08

DO - 10.5200/1822-9530.2011.08

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 141

EP - 158

JO - Current Issues of Business and Law

JF - Current Issues of Business and Law

SN - 1822-9530

IS - 1

ER -