Go climb a mountain

an application of recreation demand modelling to rock climbing in Scotland

Nick Hanley, G.M. Koop, B. Alvarez-Farizo, R.E. Wright, C. Nevin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we apply random utility modelling techniques to rock-climbing in Scotland. Attributes relevant to choices over rock-climbing sites were identified from focus groups with climbers, along with a categorisation of principal climbing areas. A survey of climbers yielded 267 responses, which were then used as the basis for modelling. We compare a standard multi-nominal logit model with a random parameters approach, and look at seasonal differences in behaviour, and at the implications of different treatments of travel time. The random utility models showed that most of the attributes selected were significant determinants of choice. Welfare estimates of changes in site attributes are presented, which are relevant to policy choices currently facing land managers.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)36-52
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Agricultural Economics
Volume52
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jan 2001

Fingerprint

Recreation
Scotland
recreation
Focus Groups
Logistic Models
rocks
mountains
focus groups
logit analysis
travel
managers
Surveys and Questionnaires
Demand modeling
Recreation demand
Modeling
methodology

Keywords

  • choice experiments
  • complexity
  • environmental valuation
  • rationality
  • recreation demand
  • rock climbing

Cite this

Hanley, Nick ; Koop, G.M. ; Alvarez-Farizo, B. ; Wright, R.E. ; Nevin, C. / Go climb a mountain : an application of recreation demand modelling to rock climbing in Scotland. In: Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2001 ; Vol. 52, No. 1. pp. 36-52.
@article{33b7cf1553834d85849f6fc7d08e1542,
title = "Go climb a mountain: an application of recreation demand modelling to rock climbing in Scotland",
abstract = "In this paper, we apply random utility modelling techniques to rock-climbing in Scotland. Attributes relevant to choices over rock-climbing sites were identified from focus groups with climbers, along with a categorisation of principal climbing areas. A survey of climbers yielded 267 responses, which were then used as the basis for modelling. We compare a standard multi-nominal logit model with a random parameters approach, and look at seasonal differences in behaviour, and at the implications of different treatments of travel time. The random utility models showed that most of the attributes selected were significant determinants of choice. Welfare estimates of changes in site attributes are presented, which are relevant to policy choices currently facing land managers.",
keywords = "choice experiments, complexity, environmental valuation, rationality, recreation demand, rock climbing",
author = "Nick Hanley and G.M. Koop and B. Alvarez-Farizo and R.E. Wright and C. Nevin",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1111/j.1477-9552.2001.tb00908.x",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "36--52",
journal = "Journal of Agricultural Economics",
issn = "0021-857X",
number = "1",

}

Go climb a mountain : an application of recreation demand modelling to rock climbing in Scotland. / Hanley, Nick; Koop, G.M.; Alvarez-Farizo, B.; Wright, R.E.; Nevin, C.

In: Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 52, No. 1, 31.01.2001, p. 36-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Go climb a mountain

T2 - an application of recreation demand modelling to rock climbing in Scotland

AU - Hanley, Nick

AU - Koop, G.M.

AU - Alvarez-Farizo, B.

AU - Wright, R.E.

AU - Nevin, C.

PY - 2001/1/31

Y1 - 2001/1/31

N2 - In this paper, we apply random utility modelling techniques to rock-climbing in Scotland. Attributes relevant to choices over rock-climbing sites were identified from focus groups with climbers, along with a categorisation of principal climbing areas. A survey of climbers yielded 267 responses, which were then used as the basis for modelling. We compare a standard multi-nominal logit model with a random parameters approach, and look at seasonal differences in behaviour, and at the implications of different treatments of travel time. The random utility models showed that most of the attributes selected were significant determinants of choice. Welfare estimates of changes in site attributes are presented, which are relevant to policy choices currently facing land managers.

AB - In this paper, we apply random utility modelling techniques to rock-climbing in Scotland. Attributes relevant to choices over rock-climbing sites were identified from focus groups with climbers, along with a categorisation of principal climbing areas. A survey of climbers yielded 267 responses, which were then used as the basis for modelling. We compare a standard multi-nominal logit model with a random parameters approach, and look at seasonal differences in behaviour, and at the implications of different treatments of travel time. The random utility models showed that most of the attributes selected were significant determinants of choice. Welfare estimates of changes in site attributes are presented, which are relevant to policy choices currently facing land managers.

KW - choice experiments

KW - complexity

KW - environmental valuation

KW - rationality

KW - recreation demand

KW - rock climbing

U2 - 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2001.tb00908.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2001.tb00908.x

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 36

EP - 52

JO - Journal of Agricultural Economics

JF - Journal of Agricultural Economics

SN - 0021-857X

IS - 1

ER -