Global environmental law: context and theory, challenge and promise

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Few issue areas exemplify the centrifugal forces that prompted the emergence of global law scholarship better than the environment. With its propensity to blur or transcend conventional distinctions between national and international, public and private, and formal and informal, environmental governance offers a consummate case study to test the promise and perils of global law. In this article, we situate global environmental law in the broader debate about lawmaking and application beyond the nation state, tracing the evolution and elusive boundaries of this nascent field. Our survey allows us to identify conceptual ambiguities and missed opportunities in the literature on global environmental law, including challenges to its normativity and legitimacy. From there, however, we proceed to outline a twofold opportunity for the global environmental law project: an opportunity to enrich environmental law with more diverse and inclusive practices; and an opportunity for collaborative self-reflexivity by the scholars and practitioners of environmental law as these not only interpret and apply, but through their work actively shape the content of the law.
LanguageEnglish
Pages405-435
Number of pages31
JournalTransnational Environmental Law
Volume8
Issue number3
Early online date31 Oct 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Nov 2019
EventGlobal Environmental Law Symposium - University of Strathclyde, Glasgow
Duration: 4 Sep 20175 Dec 2017

Fingerprint

environmental law
Law
normativity
nation state
reflexivity
legitimacy
governance

Keywords

  • global law
  • global environmental law
  • normativity
  • legitimacy
  • self-reflexivity

Cite this

@article{5cae3714becf468b921f529bd196847c,
title = "Global environmental law: context and theory, challenge and promise",
abstract = "Few issue areas exemplify the centrifugal forces that prompted the emergence of global law scholarship better than the environment. With its propensity to blur or transcend conventional distinctions between national and international, public and private, and formal and informal, environmental governance offers a consummate case study to test the promise and perils of global law. In this article, we situate global environmental law in the broader debate about lawmaking and application beyond the nation state, tracing the evolution and elusive boundaries of this nascent field. Our survey allows us to identify conceptual ambiguities and missed opportunities in the literature on global environmental law, including challenges to its normativity and legitimacy. From there, however, we proceed to outline a twofold opportunity for the global environmental law project: an opportunity to enrich environmental law with more diverse and inclusive practices; and an opportunity for collaborative self-reflexivity by the scholars and practitioners of environmental law as these not only interpret and apply, but through their work actively shape the content of the law.",
keywords = "global law, global environmental law, normativity, legitimacy, self-reflexivity",
author = "Kati Kulovesi and Michael Mehling and Elisa Morgera",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1017/S2047102519000347",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "405--435",
number = "3",

}

Global environmental law : context and theory, challenge and promise. / Kulovesi, Kati; Mehling, Michael; Morgera, Elisa.

Vol. 8, No. 3, 15.11.2019, p. 405-435.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Global environmental law

T2 - context and theory, challenge and promise

AU - Kulovesi, Kati

AU - Mehling, Michael

AU - Morgera, Elisa

PY - 2019/11/15

Y1 - 2019/11/15

N2 - Few issue areas exemplify the centrifugal forces that prompted the emergence of global law scholarship better than the environment. With its propensity to blur or transcend conventional distinctions between national and international, public and private, and formal and informal, environmental governance offers a consummate case study to test the promise and perils of global law. In this article, we situate global environmental law in the broader debate about lawmaking and application beyond the nation state, tracing the evolution and elusive boundaries of this nascent field. Our survey allows us to identify conceptual ambiguities and missed opportunities in the literature on global environmental law, including challenges to its normativity and legitimacy. From there, however, we proceed to outline a twofold opportunity for the global environmental law project: an opportunity to enrich environmental law with more diverse and inclusive practices; and an opportunity for collaborative self-reflexivity by the scholars and practitioners of environmental law as these not only interpret and apply, but through their work actively shape the content of the law.

AB - Few issue areas exemplify the centrifugal forces that prompted the emergence of global law scholarship better than the environment. With its propensity to blur or transcend conventional distinctions between national and international, public and private, and formal and informal, environmental governance offers a consummate case study to test the promise and perils of global law. In this article, we situate global environmental law in the broader debate about lawmaking and application beyond the nation state, tracing the evolution and elusive boundaries of this nascent field. Our survey allows us to identify conceptual ambiguities and missed opportunities in the literature on global environmental law, including challenges to its normativity and legitimacy. From there, however, we proceed to outline a twofold opportunity for the global environmental law project: an opportunity to enrich environmental law with more diverse and inclusive practices; and an opportunity for collaborative self-reflexivity by the scholars and practitioners of environmental law as these not only interpret and apply, but through their work actively shape the content of the law.

KW - global law

KW - global environmental law

KW - normativity

KW - legitimacy

KW - self-reflexivity

U2 - 10.1017/S2047102519000347

DO - 10.1017/S2047102519000347

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 405

EP - 435

IS - 3

ER -