Global ends, local means: cross-national homogeneity in professional service firms

Crawford Spence, Claire Dambrin, Chris Carter, Javier Husillos, Pablo Archel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An expanding institutionalist literature on professional service firms (PSFs) emphasizes that these are ridden by contradictions, paradoxes and conflicting logics. More specifically, literature looking at PSFs in a global context has highlighted how these contradictions prevent firms from becoming truly global in nature. What it takes to make partner in the Big 4 is at the core of such interrogations because partners belong to global firms yet are promoted at the national level. We undertake a cross-country comparison of partner promotion processes in Big 4 PSFs in Canada, France, Spain and the UK. Synthesizing existing institutionalist work with Bourdieusian theory, our results suggest that PSFs in different countries resemble each other very closely in terms of the requirements demanded of their partners. Although heterogeneity can be observed in the way in which different forms of capital are converted into each other, we show there is an overall homogeneity in that economic capital hurdles are the most significant, if not the sole, set of criteria upon which considerations of partnership admissions are based.
LanguageEnglish
Pages765-788
Number of pages24
JournalHuman Relations
Volume68
Issue number5
Early online date16 Oct 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2015

Fingerprint

firm
Economics
homogeneity
Homogeneity
Professional service firms
Cross-national
promotion
Spain
France
Canada
economics
Big 4
literature
Paradox
Admission
Logic
Cross-country comparison
Economic capital

Keywords

  • comparative human resource management
  • top management
  • personnel selection
  • performance appraisal and feedback
  • organizational culture
  • job/employee attitudes
  • cross-cultural human resource management

Cite this

Spence, C., Dambrin, C., Carter, C., Husillos, J., & Archel, P. (2015). Global ends, local means: cross-national homogeneity in professional service firms. Human Relations, 68(5), 765-788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726714541489
Spence, Crawford ; Dambrin, Claire ; Carter, Chris ; Husillos, Javier ; Archel, Pablo. / Global ends, local means : cross-national homogeneity in professional service firms. In: Human Relations. 2015 ; Vol. 68, No. 5. pp. 765-788.
@article{af35e1c67789486ca4fec397cf25369f,
title = "Global ends, local means: cross-national homogeneity in professional service firms",
abstract = "An expanding institutionalist literature on professional service firms (PSFs) emphasizes that these are ridden by contradictions, paradoxes and conflicting logics. More specifically, literature looking at PSFs in a global context has highlighted how these contradictions prevent firms from becoming truly global in nature. What it takes to make partner in the Big 4 is at the core of such interrogations because partners belong to global firms yet are promoted at the national level. We undertake a cross-country comparison of partner promotion processes in Big 4 PSFs in Canada, France, Spain and the UK. Synthesizing existing institutionalist work with Bourdieusian theory, our results suggest that PSFs in different countries resemble each other very closely in terms of the requirements demanded of their partners. Although heterogeneity can be observed in the way in which different forms of capital are converted into each other, we show there is an overall homogeneity in that economic capital hurdles are the most significant, if not the sole, set of criteria upon which considerations of partnership admissions are based.",
keywords = "comparative human resource management, top management, personnel selection, performance appraisal and feedback, organizational culture, job/employee attitudes, cross-cultural human resource management",
author = "Crawford Spence and Claire Dambrin and Chris Carter and Javier Husillos and Pablo Archel",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1177/0018726714541489",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "765--788",
journal = "Human Relations",
issn = "0018-7267",
number = "5",

}

Spence, C, Dambrin, C, Carter, C, Husillos, J & Archel, P 2015, 'Global ends, local means: cross-national homogeneity in professional service firms' Human Relations, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 765-788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726714541489

Global ends, local means : cross-national homogeneity in professional service firms. / Spence, Crawford; Dambrin, Claire; Carter, Chris; Husillos, Javier; Archel, Pablo.

In: Human Relations, Vol. 68, No. 5, 05.2015, p. 765-788.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Global ends, local means

T2 - Human Relations

AU - Spence, Crawford

AU - Dambrin, Claire

AU - Carter, Chris

AU - Husillos, Javier

AU - Archel, Pablo

PY - 2015/5

Y1 - 2015/5

N2 - An expanding institutionalist literature on professional service firms (PSFs) emphasizes that these are ridden by contradictions, paradoxes and conflicting logics. More specifically, literature looking at PSFs in a global context has highlighted how these contradictions prevent firms from becoming truly global in nature. What it takes to make partner in the Big 4 is at the core of such interrogations because partners belong to global firms yet are promoted at the national level. We undertake a cross-country comparison of partner promotion processes in Big 4 PSFs in Canada, France, Spain and the UK. Synthesizing existing institutionalist work with Bourdieusian theory, our results suggest that PSFs in different countries resemble each other very closely in terms of the requirements demanded of their partners. Although heterogeneity can be observed in the way in which different forms of capital are converted into each other, we show there is an overall homogeneity in that economic capital hurdles are the most significant, if not the sole, set of criteria upon which considerations of partnership admissions are based.

AB - An expanding institutionalist literature on professional service firms (PSFs) emphasizes that these are ridden by contradictions, paradoxes and conflicting logics. More specifically, literature looking at PSFs in a global context has highlighted how these contradictions prevent firms from becoming truly global in nature. What it takes to make partner in the Big 4 is at the core of such interrogations because partners belong to global firms yet are promoted at the national level. We undertake a cross-country comparison of partner promotion processes in Big 4 PSFs in Canada, France, Spain and the UK. Synthesizing existing institutionalist work with Bourdieusian theory, our results suggest that PSFs in different countries resemble each other very closely in terms of the requirements demanded of their partners. Although heterogeneity can be observed in the way in which different forms of capital are converted into each other, we show there is an overall homogeneity in that economic capital hurdles are the most significant, if not the sole, set of criteria upon which considerations of partnership admissions are based.

KW - comparative human resource management

KW - top management

KW - personnel selection

KW - performance appraisal and feedback

KW - organizational culture

KW - job/employee attitudes

KW - cross-cultural human resource management

U2 - 10.1177/0018726714541489

DO - 10.1177/0018726714541489

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 765

EP - 788

JO - Human Relations

JF - Human Relations

SN - 0018-7267

IS - 5

ER -