Global climate change and the fragmentation of international law

Harro Van Asselt, Francesco Sindico, Michael Mehling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Born into the wider body of international law, the climate regime needs to be understood in light of preexisting regimes. By drawing on the current debate about fragmentation in international law, this article highlights challenges for international lawyers and policymakers in navigating the relationship between the climate regime and the biodiversity regime, and the relationship between the climate regime and the multilateral trading system. This article concludes that a narrow focus on conflicts misrepresents the multifaceted nature of climate change and precludes an adequate jurisprudential understanding of the relationship between the climate regime and other regimes. An improved understanding, particularly with respect to interactions with the biodiversity regime, requires a broadening of the debate that takes account of the institutional aspects of these relationships that may allow enhanced political cooperation and coordination. Further, international law, and in particular the emerging concept of systemic integration, has the potential to make a positive contribution to the climate-trade interplay.
LanguageEnglish
Pages423-449
Number of pages27
JournalLaw and Policy
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2008

Fingerprint

international law
fragmentation
climate change
climate
regime
biodiversity
lawyer
interaction

Keywords

  • international law
  • global climate change
  • climate change
  • global politics

Cite this

Van Asselt, Harro ; Sindico, Francesco ; Mehling, Michael. / Global climate change and the fragmentation of international law. In: Law and Policy. 2008 ; Vol. 30, No. 4. pp. 423-449.
@article{61fd74858c6d405288a030c98e802605,
title = "Global climate change and the fragmentation of international law",
abstract = "Born into the wider body of international law, the climate regime needs to be understood in light of preexisting regimes. By drawing on the current debate about fragmentation in international law, this article highlights challenges for international lawyers and policymakers in navigating the relationship between the climate regime and the biodiversity regime, and the relationship between the climate regime and the multilateral trading system. This article concludes that a narrow focus on conflicts misrepresents the multifaceted nature of climate change and precludes an adequate jurisprudential understanding of the relationship between the climate regime and other regimes. An improved understanding, particularly with respect to interactions with the biodiversity regime, requires a broadening of the debate that takes account of the institutional aspects of these relationships that may allow enhanced political cooperation and coordination. Further, international law, and in particular the emerging concept of systemic integration, has the potential to make a positive contribution to the climate-trade interplay.",
keywords = "international law, global climate change, climate change, global politics",
author = "{Van Asselt}, Harro and Francesco Sindico and Michael Mehling",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9930.2008.00286.x",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "423--449",
journal = "Law and Policy",
issn = "0265-8240",
number = "4",

}

Global climate change and the fragmentation of international law. / Van Asselt, Harro; Sindico, Francesco; Mehling, Michael.

In: Law and Policy, Vol. 30, No. 4, 10.2008, p. 423-449.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Global climate change and the fragmentation of international law

AU - Van Asselt, Harro

AU - Sindico, Francesco

AU - Mehling, Michael

PY - 2008/10

Y1 - 2008/10

N2 - Born into the wider body of international law, the climate regime needs to be understood in light of preexisting regimes. By drawing on the current debate about fragmentation in international law, this article highlights challenges for international lawyers and policymakers in navigating the relationship between the climate regime and the biodiversity regime, and the relationship between the climate regime and the multilateral trading system. This article concludes that a narrow focus on conflicts misrepresents the multifaceted nature of climate change and precludes an adequate jurisprudential understanding of the relationship between the climate regime and other regimes. An improved understanding, particularly with respect to interactions with the biodiversity regime, requires a broadening of the debate that takes account of the institutional aspects of these relationships that may allow enhanced political cooperation and coordination. Further, international law, and in particular the emerging concept of systemic integration, has the potential to make a positive contribution to the climate-trade interplay.

AB - Born into the wider body of international law, the climate regime needs to be understood in light of preexisting regimes. By drawing on the current debate about fragmentation in international law, this article highlights challenges for international lawyers and policymakers in navigating the relationship between the climate regime and the biodiversity regime, and the relationship between the climate regime and the multilateral trading system. This article concludes that a narrow focus on conflicts misrepresents the multifaceted nature of climate change and precludes an adequate jurisprudential understanding of the relationship between the climate regime and other regimes. An improved understanding, particularly with respect to interactions with the biodiversity regime, requires a broadening of the debate that takes account of the institutional aspects of these relationships that may allow enhanced political cooperation and coordination. Further, international law, and in particular the emerging concept of systemic integration, has the potential to make a positive contribution to the climate-trade interplay.

KW - international law

KW - global climate change

KW - climate change

KW - global politics

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2008.00286.x/abstract

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2008.00286.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2008.00286.x

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 423

EP - 449

JO - Law and Policy

T2 - Law and Policy

JF - Law and Policy

SN - 0265-8240

IS - 4

ER -