Giving voters what they want? Party orientation perceptions and preferences in the British electorate

Robert Johns, Heinz Brandenburg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Some of the most important propositions in the political marketing literature hinge on assumptions about the electorate. In particular, voters are presumed to react in different ways to different orientations or postures. Yet there are theoretical reasons for questioning some of these assumptions, and certainly they have seldom been empirically tested. Here, we focus on one prominent example of political marketing research: Lees-Marshment’s orientations’ model. We investigate how the public reacts to product and market orientation, whether they see a trade-off between the two (a point in dispute among political marketing scholars), and whether partisans differ from non-partisan voters by being more inclined to value product over market orientation. Evidence from two mass sample surveys of the British public (both conducted online by YouGov) demonstrates important heterogeneity within the electorate, casts doubt on the core assumptions underlying some political marketing arguments and raises broader questions about what voters are looking for in a party.
LanguageEnglish
Pages89-104
Number of pages16
JournalParty Politics
Volume20
Issue number1
Early online date22 Feb 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2014

Fingerprint

marketing
market orientation
evidence
Values

Keywords

  • market orientation
  • party identification
  • political marketing
  • Britain
  • party preferences

Cite this

@article{2ad185a66bfb43b18fba28d5f28f290c,
title = "Giving voters what they want? Party orientation perceptions and preferences in the British electorate",
abstract = "Some of the most important propositions in the political marketing literature hinge on assumptions about the electorate. In particular, voters are presumed to react in different ways to different orientations or postures. Yet there are theoretical reasons for questioning some of these assumptions, and certainly they have seldom been empirically tested. Here, we focus on one prominent example of political marketing research: Lees-Marshment’s orientations’ model. We investigate how the public reacts to product and market orientation, whether they see a trade-off between the two (a point in dispute among political marketing scholars), and whether partisans differ from non-partisan voters by being more inclined to value product over market orientation. Evidence from two mass sample surveys of the British public (both conducted online by YouGov) demonstrates important heterogeneity within the electorate, casts doubt on the core assumptions underlying some political marketing arguments and raises broader questions about what voters are looking for in a party.",
keywords = "market orientation, party identification, political marketing, Britain, party preferences",
author = "Robert Johns and Heinz Brandenburg",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1354068811436040",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "89--104",
journal = "Party Politics",
issn = "1354-0688",
number = "1",

}

Giving voters what they want? Party orientation perceptions and preferences in the British electorate. / Johns, Robert; Brandenburg, Heinz.

In: Party Politics, Vol. 20, No. 1, 01.2014, p. 89-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Giving voters what they want? Party orientation perceptions and preferences in the British electorate

AU - Johns, Robert

AU - Brandenburg, Heinz

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - Some of the most important propositions in the political marketing literature hinge on assumptions about the electorate. In particular, voters are presumed to react in different ways to different orientations or postures. Yet there are theoretical reasons for questioning some of these assumptions, and certainly they have seldom been empirically tested. Here, we focus on one prominent example of political marketing research: Lees-Marshment’s orientations’ model. We investigate how the public reacts to product and market orientation, whether they see a trade-off between the two (a point in dispute among political marketing scholars), and whether partisans differ from non-partisan voters by being more inclined to value product over market orientation. Evidence from two mass sample surveys of the British public (both conducted online by YouGov) demonstrates important heterogeneity within the electorate, casts doubt on the core assumptions underlying some political marketing arguments and raises broader questions about what voters are looking for in a party.

AB - Some of the most important propositions in the political marketing literature hinge on assumptions about the electorate. In particular, voters are presumed to react in different ways to different orientations or postures. Yet there are theoretical reasons for questioning some of these assumptions, and certainly they have seldom been empirically tested. Here, we focus on one prominent example of political marketing research: Lees-Marshment’s orientations’ model. We investigate how the public reacts to product and market orientation, whether they see a trade-off between the two (a point in dispute among political marketing scholars), and whether partisans differ from non-partisan voters by being more inclined to value product over market orientation. Evidence from two mass sample surveys of the British public (both conducted online by YouGov) demonstrates important heterogeneity within the electorate, casts doubt on the core assumptions underlying some political marketing arguments and raises broader questions about what voters are looking for in a party.

KW - market orientation

KW - party identification

KW - political marketing

KW - Britain

KW - party preferences

U2 - 10.1177/1354068811436040

DO - 10.1177/1354068811436040

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 89

EP - 104

JO - Party Politics

T2 - Party Politics

JF - Party Politics

SN - 1354-0688

IS - 1

ER -