Getting tough with the dragon? The comparative correlates of foreign policy attitudes toward China in the United States and UK

Thomas J. Scotto, Jason Reifler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A large body of research suggests mass publics are capable of thinking coherently about international relations. We extend this body of research to show that domain relevant postures - in our case, more abstract beliefs about foreign policy - are related to how tough of a line representative samples of US and UK respondents want their governments to take toward China. More specifically, we utilize a unique comparative survey of American and British foreign policy attitudes to show broad support for toughness toward China. Beliefs about the use of the military and attitudes regarding globalization help explain preferences for tough economic and military policies toward China. In the two countries, the relationship between general foreign policy outlooks and the positions citizens take is robust to the addition of a general mediator that controls for the general affect those surveyed have toward China. Finally, the strength of the relationship between these abstract postures and specific preferences for a China policy are different across the countries.

LanguageEnglish
Pages265-299
Number of pages35
JournalInternational Relations of the Asia-Pacific
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jun 2017

Fingerprint

foreign policy
China
military policy
Economic Policy
international relations
Military
Correlates
Foreign policy
globalization
citizen

Keywords

  • international relations
  • foreign policy
  • UK
  • China
  • comparative study
  • USA

Cite this

@article{05b6dfcbaddf430cbc1f2bd47be5fb6c,
title = "Getting tough with the dragon? The comparative correlates of foreign policy attitudes toward China in the United States and UK",
abstract = "A large body of research suggests mass publics are capable of thinking coherently about international relations. We extend this body of research to show that domain relevant postures - in our case, more abstract beliefs about foreign policy - are related to how tough of a line representative samples of US and UK respondents want their governments to take toward China. More specifically, we utilize a unique comparative survey of American and British foreign policy attitudes to show broad support for toughness toward China. Beliefs about the use of the military and attitudes regarding globalization help explain preferences for tough economic and military policies toward China. In the two countries, the relationship between general foreign policy outlooks and the positions citizens take is robust to the addition of a general mediator that controls for the general affect those surveyed have toward China. Finally, the strength of the relationship between these abstract postures and specific preferences for a China policy are different across the countries.",
keywords = "international relations, foreign policy, UK, China, comparative study, USA",
author = "Scotto, {Thomas J.} and Jason Reifler",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1093/irap/lcw008",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "265--299",
journal = "International Relations of the Asia-Pacific",
issn = "1470-482X",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Getting tough with the dragon? The comparative correlates of foreign policy attitudes toward China in the United States and UK

AU - Scotto, Thomas J.

AU - Reifler, Jason

PY - 2017/6/20

Y1 - 2017/6/20

N2 - A large body of research suggests mass publics are capable of thinking coherently about international relations. We extend this body of research to show that domain relevant postures - in our case, more abstract beliefs about foreign policy - are related to how tough of a line representative samples of US and UK respondents want their governments to take toward China. More specifically, we utilize a unique comparative survey of American and British foreign policy attitudes to show broad support for toughness toward China. Beliefs about the use of the military and attitudes regarding globalization help explain preferences for tough economic and military policies toward China. In the two countries, the relationship between general foreign policy outlooks and the positions citizens take is robust to the addition of a general mediator that controls for the general affect those surveyed have toward China. Finally, the strength of the relationship between these abstract postures and specific preferences for a China policy are different across the countries.

AB - A large body of research suggests mass publics are capable of thinking coherently about international relations. We extend this body of research to show that domain relevant postures - in our case, more abstract beliefs about foreign policy - are related to how tough of a line representative samples of US and UK respondents want their governments to take toward China. More specifically, we utilize a unique comparative survey of American and British foreign policy attitudes to show broad support for toughness toward China. Beliefs about the use of the military and attitudes regarding globalization help explain preferences for tough economic and military policies toward China. In the two countries, the relationship between general foreign policy outlooks and the positions citizens take is robust to the addition of a general mediator that controls for the general affect those surveyed have toward China. Finally, the strength of the relationship between these abstract postures and specific preferences for a China policy are different across the countries.

KW - international relations

KW - foreign policy

KW - UK

KW - China

KW - comparative study

KW - USA

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019743237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/irap/lcw008

DO - 10.1093/irap/lcw008

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 265

EP - 299

JO - International Relations of the Asia-Pacific

T2 - International Relations of the Asia-Pacific

JF - International Relations of the Asia-Pacific

SN - 1470-482X

IS - 2

ER -