Getting together to improve the school environment

user consultation, participatory design and student voice

Pam Woolner, Elaine Hall, Kate Wall, David Dennison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article first investigates historical trends in both the practice and the understanding of consultation, considering the often contrasting perspectives of architects and designers, compared to teachers and educationalists. Differing assumptions held by these two broad groups of professionals can lead to conflicting aims and objectives for school buildings, even where there is determination to communicate effectively and find common ground. Our exploration of this issue will centre on the potential contribution of users of the educational environment and, in particular, what happens to the student perspective. Consultation over school buildings has tended in the past to centre on educators, and so miss out direct involvement of students (Woolner et al., 2005). However, there is increasing conviction that children should participate in decision-making (Burke and Grosvenor, 2003; Clark et al., 2003), including about school-design (DfES, 2002), and methods are being developed to do this (Wall and Higgins, 2006). The historical analysis will bring us to a point where, using the example of one school, the consultation procedure in practice can be reflected on. This will form the second element of the article, exploring consultation within the modern context of participatory school design and student voice. The experiences of a school undergoing redesign of a classroom space will be discussed in light of the dichotomy previously established, the perspective of architecture in contrast to that of education. The role of the child's view in influencing design solutions will be considered, together with the consequences for teaching and learning, consultation procedures and the re-design of school buildings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)233-248
Number of pages16
JournalImproving Schools
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2007

Fingerprint

school
student
building
historical analysis
architect
educator
decision making
classroom
trend
Teaching
teacher
learning
education
experience
Group

Keywords

  • classroom
  • design process
  • learning environment
  • redesign
  • school architecture
  • school building

Cite this

@article{b3e932957c4b4839ba9611620db8d7e9,
title = "Getting together to improve the school environment: user consultation, participatory design and student voice",
abstract = "This article first investigates historical trends in both the practice and the understanding of consultation, considering the often contrasting perspectives of architects and designers, compared to teachers and educationalists. Differing assumptions held by these two broad groups of professionals can lead to conflicting aims and objectives for school buildings, even where there is determination to communicate effectively and find common ground. Our exploration of this issue will centre on the potential contribution of users of the educational environment and, in particular, what happens to the student perspective. Consultation over school buildings has tended in the past to centre on educators, and so miss out direct involvement of students (Woolner et al., 2005). However, there is increasing conviction that children should participate in decision-making (Burke and Grosvenor, 2003; Clark et al., 2003), including about school-design (DfES, 2002), and methods are being developed to do this (Wall and Higgins, 2006). The historical analysis will bring us to a point where, using the example of one school, the consultation procedure in practice can be reflected on. This will form the second element of the article, exploring consultation within the modern context of participatory school design and student voice. The experiences of a school undergoing redesign of a classroom space will be discussed in light of the dichotomy previously established, the perspective of architecture in contrast to that of education. The role of the child's view in influencing design solutions will be considered, together with the consequences for teaching and learning, consultation procedures and the re-design of school buildings.",
keywords = "classroom, design process, learning environment, redesign, school architecture, school building",
author = "Pam Woolner and Elaine Hall and Kate Wall and David Dennison",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1365480207077846",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "233--248",
journal = "Improving Schools",
issn = "1365-4802",
number = "3",

}

Getting together to improve the school environment : user consultation, participatory design and student voice. / Woolner, Pam; Hall, Elaine; Wall, Kate; Dennison, David.

In: Improving Schools, Vol. 10, No. 3, 01.11.2007, p. 233-248.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Getting together to improve the school environment

T2 - user consultation, participatory design and student voice

AU - Woolner, Pam

AU - Hall, Elaine

AU - Wall, Kate

AU - Dennison, David

PY - 2007/11/1

Y1 - 2007/11/1

N2 - This article first investigates historical trends in both the practice and the understanding of consultation, considering the often contrasting perspectives of architects and designers, compared to teachers and educationalists. Differing assumptions held by these two broad groups of professionals can lead to conflicting aims and objectives for school buildings, even where there is determination to communicate effectively and find common ground. Our exploration of this issue will centre on the potential contribution of users of the educational environment and, in particular, what happens to the student perspective. Consultation over school buildings has tended in the past to centre on educators, and so miss out direct involvement of students (Woolner et al., 2005). However, there is increasing conviction that children should participate in decision-making (Burke and Grosvenor, 2003; Clark et al., 2003), including about school-design (DfES, 2002), and methods are being developed to do this (Wall and Higgins, 2006). The historical analysis will bring us to a point where, using the example of one school, the consultation procedure in practice can be reflected on. This will form the second element of the article, exploring consultation within the modern context of participatory school design and student voice. The experiences of a school undergoing redesign of a classroom space will be discussed in light of the dichotomy previously established, the perspective of architecture in contrast to that of education. The role of the child's view in influencing design solutions will be considered, together with the consequences for teaching and learning, consultation procedures and the re-design of school buildings.

AB - This article first investigates historical trends in both the practice and the understanding of consultation, considering the often contrasting perspectives of architects and designers, compared to teachers and educationalists. Differing assumptions held by these two broad groups of professionals can lead to conflicting aims and objectives for school buildings, even where there is determination to communicate effectively and find common ground. Our exploration of this issue will centre on the potential contribution of users of the educational environment and, in particular, what happens to the student perspective. Consultation over school buildings has tended in the past to centre on educators, and so miss out direct involvement of students (Woolner et al., 2005). However, there is increasing conviction that children should participate in decision-making (Burke and Grosvenor, 2003; Clark et al., 2003), including about school-design (DfES, 2002), and methods are being developed to do this (Wall and Higgins, 2006). The historical analysis will bring us to a point where, using the example of one school, the consultation procedure in practice can be reflected on. This will form the second element of the article, exploring consultation within the modern context of participatory school design and student voice. The experiences of a school undergoing redesign of a classroom space will be discussed in light of the dichotomy previously established, the perspective of architecture in contrast to that of education. The role of the child's view in influencing design solutions will be considered, together with the consequences for teaching and learning, consultation procedures and the re-design of school buildings.

KW - classroom

KW - design process

KW - learning environment

KW - redesign

KW - school architecture

KW - school building

UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-35748976861&origin=inward&txGid=0

U2 - 10.1177/1365480207077846

DO - 10.1177/1365480207077846

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 233

EP - 248

JO - Improving Schools

JF - Improving Schools

SN - 1365-4802

IS - 3

ER -