Genetically modified organisms in agriculture: can regulations work?

D. Kothamasi, S. Vermeylen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Genetically modified (GM) crops have been recognised to be economically beneficial to subsistence farmers and have been projected as essential tools for addressing challenges in hunger, environmental sustainability and international development. Yet the uncertainty of their effects on human health and the undesirable ecological consequences of these organisms have raised concerns on the rapid pace of their production. Regulating the release of these organisms is a critical environmental issue. The Cartagena protocol on bio-safety, the principle legal arrangement for the regulation of these organisms, has ratifications from only 157 countries and has proven to be a weak regulator. Countries like India and Brazil have seen the proliferation of unapproved stealth GM varieties which make regulation even more difficult. In this paper, we explore the debate surrounding the introduction of GM organisms and analyse the effectiveness of existing legal regimes to regulate their use.
LanguageEnglish
Pages535-546
Number of pages12
JournalEnvironment, Development and Sustainability
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2011

Fingerprint

genetically modified organism
agriculture
ecological consequences
biosafety
regulation
ratification
hunger
subsistence
environmental issue
proliferation
farmer
Brazil
sustainability
uncertainty
India
crop
health
organism
Agriculture
Genetically modified organisms

Keywords

  • genetically modified organisms
  • bt-cotton
  • cartagena protocol on bio-safety
  • intellectual property rights
  • stealth seeds

Cite this

@article{9c61cc7a6e774c509a5816f46100e825,
title = "Genetically modified organisms in agriculture: can regulations work?",
abstract = "Genetically modified (GM) crops have been recognised to be economically beneficial to subsistence farmers and have been projected as essential tools for addressing challenges in hunger, environmental sustainability and international development. Yet the uncertainty of their effects on human health and the undesirable ecological consequences of these organisms have raised concerns on the rapid pace of their production. Regulating the release of these organisms is a critical environmental issue. The Cartagena protocol on bio-safety, the principle legal arrangement for the regulation of these organisms, has ratifications from only 157 countries and has proven to be a weak regulator. Countries like India and Brazil have seen the proliferation of unapproved stealth GM varieties which make regulation even more difficult. In this paper, we explore the debate surrounding the introduction of GM organisms and analyse the effectiveness of existing legal regimes to regulate their use.",
keywords = "genetically modified organisms, bt-cotton, cartagena protocol on bio-safety, intellectual property rights, stealth seeds",
author = "D. Kothamasi and S. Vermeylen",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10668-010-9275-3",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "535--546",
journal = "Environment, Development and Sustainability",
issn = "1387-585X",
number = "3",

}

Genetically modified organisms in agriculture : can regulations work? / Kothamasi, D.; Vermeylen, S.

In: Environment, Development and Sustainability, Vol. 13, No. 3, 01.06.2011, p. 535-546.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Genetically modified organisms in agriculture

T2 - Environment, Development and Sustainability

AU - Kothamasi, D.

AU - Vermeylen, S.

PY - 2011/6/1

Y1 - 2011/6/1

N2 - Genetically modified (GM) crops have been recognised to be economically beneficial to subsistence farmers and have been projected as essential tools for addressing challenges in hunger, environmental sustainability and international development. Yet the uncertainty of their effects on human health and the undesirable ecological consequences of these organisms have raised concerns on the rapid pace of their production. Regulating the release of these organisms is a critical environmental issue. The Cartagena protocol on bio-safety, the principle legal arrangement for the regulation of these organisms, has ratifications from only 157 countries and has proven to be a weak regulator. Countries like India and Brazil have seen the proliferation of unapproved stealth GM varieties which make regulation even more difficult. In this paper, we explore the debate surrounding the introduction of GM organisms and analyse the effectiveness of existing legal regimes to regulate their use.

AB - Genetically modified (GM) crops have been recognised to be economically beneficial to subsistence farmers and have been projected as essential tools for addressing challenges in hunger, environmental sustainability and international development. Yet the uncertainty of their effects on human health and the undesirable ecological consequences of these organisms have raised concerns on the rapid pace of their production. Regulating the release of these organisms is a critical environmental issue. The Cartagena protocol on bio-safety, the principle legal arrangement for the regulation of these organisms, has ratifications from only 157 countries and has proven to be a weak regulator. Countries like India and Brazil have seen the proliferation of unapproved stealth GM varieties which make regulation even more difficult. In this paper, we explore the debate surrounding the introduction of GM organisms and analyse the effectiveness of existing legal regimes to regulate their use.

KW - genetically modified organisms

KW - bt-cotton

KW - cartagena protocol on bio-safety

KW - intellectual property rights

KW - stealth seeds

U2 - 10.1007/s10668-010-9275-3

DO - 10.1007/s10668-010-9275-3

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 535

EP - 546

JO - Environment, Development and Sustainability

JF - Environment, Development and Sustainability

SN - 1387-585X

IS - 3

ER -