Gender in/and the news in the UK and Republic of Ireland: slow but (un)steady progress

Dawn Wheatley*, Karen Ross, Cynthia Carter, Karen Boyle

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

For the half-century or so in which the relationship between women and news has been researched, two of the key themes have been the underrepresentation and marginalisation of women as both subjects/sources and journalists. The latest Global Media Monitoring Project (GMMP) iteration – the largest international collaborative study of women and news, running since 1995 – found the pace of change regarding women’s visibility across the news landscape to be painfully slow. Focusing on the 2020 data from the UK and Ireland, this article asks how visible are women in the news and how has this changed over time? It documents how women remain overshadowed as sources and subjects: for every two women seen or heard, there are five men. While the number of women journalists is gradually increasing, they are still less likely to cover prestigious beats such as politics and have the strongest showing as news anchors and presenters. In this article, we also use news about politics and COVID-19 as vignettes to illustrate how in times of crisis or when authoritative voices are sought, journalists are often drawn to those male sources who are already more present than women in positions of power. This contributes to the marginalisation of women’s voices in the most prominent news stories and undermines their right to full participation in democratic society.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalJournalism
Early online date24 Aug 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 24 Aug 2024

Keywords

  • news
  • gender
  • media monitoring
  • women
  • journalism
  • content analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender in/and the news in the UK and Republic of Ireland: slow but (un)steady progress'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this