Gender, candidate image and electoral preference

R.A. Johns, M.P. Shephard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Studies show that voters make judgements about politicians - their competence, honesty, warmth and so on - on the basis of physical appearance, and that these judgements can influence voting behaviour. This raises the possibility of two different gender gaps: (i) female and male candidates may be evaluated differently, ultimately affecting their relative electoral performance; and (ii) female and male voters may react differently to candidate images. We explore this using a stacked data set of evaluations of 36 UK MPs by 368 undergraduate students, and find evidence of both gender gaps. First, we confirm the persistent finding that voters assign 'warmth' traits to female and 'strength' traits to male candidates. Such stereotyping has an interesting impact on electoral preference: male candidates were judged more by warmth, female candidates more by strength, suggesting that stereotypical traits were taken for granted. Second, we find male voters more likely than female voters to see male candidates as stronger, and to prioritise strength in voting. Our results also support the view that gender and appearance heuristics are relied on most by those with little other basis for judgement, such as non-partisans. Hence, while gender effects on voting are weak when averaged across the whole electorate, they could be much stronger for (expanding) sub-groups of voters.
LanguageEnglish
Pages434-460
Number of pages26
JournalBritish Journal of Politics and International Relations
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2007

Fingerprint

gender
candidacy
voting
voting behavior
heuristics
politician
student
evaluation
performance
evidence
Group

Keywords

  • gender
  • political studies
  • elections
  • politics
  • voting

Cite this

@article{f4969786dd7f42b7a9fd8db3716e95a8,
title = "Gender, candidate image and electoral preference",
abstract = "Studies show that voters make judgements about politicians - their competence, honesty, warmth and so on - on the basis of physical appearance, and that these judgements can influence voting behaviour. This raises the possibility of two different gender gaps: (i) female and male candidates may be evaluated differently, ultimately affecting their relative electoral performance; and (ii) female and male voters may react differently to candidate images. We explore this using a stacked data set of evaluations of 36 UK MPs by 368 undergraduate students, and find evidence of both gender gaps. First, we confirm the persistent finding that voters assign 'warmth' traits to female and 'strength' traits to male candidates. Such stereotyping has an interesting impact on electoral preference: male candidates were judged more by warmth, female candidates more by strength, suggesting that stereotypical traits were taken for granted. Second, we find male voters more likely than female voters to see male candidates as stronger, and to prioritise strength in voting. Our results also support the view that gender and appearance heuristics are relied on most by those with little other basis for judgement, such as non-partisans. Hence, while gender effects on voting are weak when averaged across the whole electorate, they could be much stronger for (expanding) sub-groups of voters.",
keywords = "gender, political studies, elections, politics, voting",
author = "R.A. Johns and M.P. Shephard",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-856x.2006.00263.x",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "434--460",
journal = "British Journal of Politics and International Relations",
issn = "1369-1481",
number = "3",

}

Gender, candidate image and electoral preference. / Johns, R.A.; Shephard, M.P.

In: British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 9, No. 3, 08.2007, p. 434-460.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender, candidate image and electoral preference

AU - Johns, R.A.

AU - Shephard, M.P.

PY - 2007/8

Y1 - 2007/8

N2 - Studies show that voters make judgements about politicians - their competence, honesty, warmth and so on - on the basis of physical appearance, and that these judgements can influence voting behaviour. This raises the possibility of two different gender gaps: (i) female and male candidates may be evaluated differently, ultimately affecting their relative electoral performance; and (ii) female and male voters may react differently to candidate images. We explore this using a stacked data set of evaluations of 36 UK MPs by 368 undergraduate students, and find evidence of both gender gaps. First, we confirm the persistent finding that voters assign 'warmth' traits to female and 'strength' traits to male candidates. Such stereotyping has an interesting impact on electoral preference: male candidates were judged more by warmth, female candidates more by strength, suggesting that stereotypical traits were taken for granted. Second, we find male voters more likely than female voters to see male candidates as stronger, and to prioritise strength in voting. Our results also support the view that gender and appearance heuristics are relied on most by those with little other basis for judgement, such as non-partisans. Hence, while gender effects on voting are weak when averaged across the whole electorate, they could be much stronger for (expanding) sub-groups of voters.

AB - Studies show that voters make judgements about politicians - their competence, honesty, warmth and so on - on the basis of physical appearance, and that these judgements can influence voting behaviour. This raises the possibility of two different gender gaps: (i) female and male candidates may be evaluated differently, ultimately affecting their relative electoral performance; and (ii) female and male voters may react differently to candidate images. We explore this using a stacked data set of evaluations of 36 UK MPs by 368 undergraduate students, and find evidence of both gender gaps. First, we confirm the persistent finding that voters assign 'warmth' traits to female and 'strength' traits to male candidates. Such stereotyping has an interesting impact on electoral preference: male candidates were judged more by warmth, female candidates more by strength, suggesting that stereotypical traits were taken for granted. Second, we find male voters more likely than female voters to see male candidates as stronger, and to prioritise strength in voting. Our results also support the view that gender and appearance heuristics are relied on most by those with little other basis for judgement, such as non-partisans. Hence, while gender effects on voting are weak when averaged across the whole electorate, they could be much stronger for (expanding) sub-groups of voters.

KW - gender

KW - political studies

KW - elections

KW - politics

KW - voting

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856x.2006.00263.x

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-856x.2006.00263.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-856x.2006.00263.x

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 434

EP - 460

JO - British Journal of Politics and International Relations

T2 - British Journal of Politics and International Relations

JF - British Journal of Politics and International Relations

SN - 1369-1481

IS - 3

ER -