Gender and opinion–policy congruence in Europe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)
13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In a well-functioning democracy, public policy should not systematically reflect the preferences of some groups of citizens less well than those of others. Yet, it is often believed that this is the case for women, with one potential reason being their lower presence in politics. However, we lack systematic empirical evidence on the representation of women’s and men’s preferences in concrete policy. This study provides such evidence for a diverse set of twenty specific policy issues in 31 European countries. While the majorities of men and women often desire the same policies, men’s preferences are more likely to be represented when they disagree. This pattern can neither be explained by the proportion of women in parliament nor by the left–right position of the government. In contrast, a higher effective number of political parties increases women’s relative representation, while electoral system proportionality does not. ‘New politics’ issues play a key role here, but differences in women’s representation do not seem to be due to presence of Green parties and government positions on the libertarian-authoritarian dimension.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)613-635
Number of pages23
JournalEuropean Political Science Review
Volume10
Issue number4
Early online date10 Sep 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2018

Keywords

  • opinion-policy congruence
  • gender
  • descriptive representation
  • electoral systems
  • political behaviour
  • public opinion

Profiles

No photo of Stefanie Reher

Stefanie Reher

Person: Academic

Cite this