Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Gait-training interventions for individuals with chronic ankle instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Christine E. Ortega
  • , Danielle M. Torp
  • , Luke Donovan
  • , Jeffrey D. Simpson
  • , Lauren Forsyth
  • , Rachel M. Koldenhoven*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

22 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is a condition known to negatively affect lower extremity gait biomechanics during walking. Gait-training interventions have been proposed as a potential strategy to improve faulty movement patterns associated with CAI. Objective To determine if gait-training interventions influence lower extremity biomechanics during walking in individuals with CAI. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data Sources Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and MEDLINE from database inception through September 15, 2022. Study Selection Eligible studies were published in English and included randomized controlled trials, studies with a repeated-measures design, and descriptive laboratory studies in which authors measured the biomechanical outcomes (kinematics, kinetics, and electromyography) of a gait-training intervention during walking in individuals with CAI. Data Extraction One author extracted study design, participant characteristics, sample size, intervention type (device and biofeedback), intervention length, and biomechanical outcome measures (kinematics, kinetics, and electromyography). Data Synthesis Gait-training interventions were broadly categorized into device (destabilization and novel gait-training devices) and biofeedback (visual, auditory, and haptic delivery modes). When appropriate, meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model to compare mean differences and SDs before and after the gait-training intervention. Results Thirteen studies were included. Meta-analyses were conducted only for single-session gait-training studies. Authors of 11 studies reported kinetic outcomes. Meta-analyses showed the location of center of pressure was shifted medially from 0% to 90% of stance (effect size [ES] range, −0.35 to −0.82), contact time was decreased in the medial forefoot (ES = −0.43), peak pressure was decreased for the lateral midfoot (ES = −1.18) and increased for the hallux (ES = 0.59), and the pressure time integral was decreased for the lateral heel (ES = −0.33) and the lateral midfoot (ES = −1.22) and increased for the hallux (ES = 0.63). Authors of 3 studies reported kinematic outcomes. Authors of 7 studies reported electromyography outcomes. Meta-analyses revealed increased activity for 200 milliseconds after initial contact for the fibularis longus muscle (ES = 0.83). Conclusions Gait-training protocols improved some lower extremity biomechanical outcomes in individuals with CAI. Plantar-pressure outcome measures seemed to be most affected by gait-training programs, with improvements including decreasing the lateral pressure associated with increased risk for lateral ankle sprains. Gait training increased electromyographic activity after initial contact for the fibularis longus muscle. Authors of few studies have assessed the effect of multisession gait training on biomechanical outcome measures. Targeted gait training should be considered when treating patients with CAI.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)332-351
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Athletic Training
Volume60
Issue number5
Early online date13 Aug 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 May 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • gait training device
  • ankle sprain
  • biomechanics
  • biofeedback
  • rehabilitation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gait-training interventions for individuals with chronic ankle instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this