Funding pensions in Scotland: would independence matter?

David Bell, David Comerford, David Eiser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Economic issues will be key determinants of the outcome of the Scottish referendum on independence. Pensions are a key element of the economic case for or against independence. The costs of funding pensions in an independent Scotland would be influenced by mortality risks, the costs of borrowing and the segmentation of costs and risks (i.e. pricing to Scotland's experience rather than pooled across UK experience). We compare the overall costs of providing pensions in an independent Scotland against the resources that are available to cover these costs. Scotland has worse mortality experience than the UK as a whole, and Scottish government debt is likely to attract a liquidity premium relative to UK government debt. An independent Scottish government would have to create a bond market for public debt. The liquidity premium would make pensions cheaper to buy, but taxpayers or the consumers of public services would have to pay the cost.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)R21-R31
Number of pages11
JournalNational Institute Economic Review
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2014


  • pensions
  • bonds
  • Scottish independence
  • risk pooling
  • mortality rates


Dive into the research topics of 'Funding pensions in Scotland: would independence matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this