Funding pensions in Scotland: would independence matter?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Economic issues will be key determinants of the outcome of the Scottish referendum on independence. Pensions are a key element of the economic case for or against independence. The costs of funding pensions in an independent Scotland would be influenced by mortality risks, the costs of borrowing and the segmentation of costs and risks (i.e. pricing to Scotland's experience rather than pooled across UK experience). We compare the overall costs of providing pensions in an independent Scotland against the resources that are available to cover these costs. Scotland has worse mortality experience than the UK as a whole, and Scottish government debt is likely to attract a liquidity premium relative to UK government debt. An independent Scottish government would have to create a bond market for public debt. The liquidity premium would make pensions cheaper to buy, but taxpayers or the consumers of public services would have to pay the cost.
LanguageEnglish
PagesR21-R31
Number of pages11
JournalNational Institute Economic Review
Volume227
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Costs
Pension funding
Scotland
Pensions
Economics
Government debt
Liquidity premium
Segmentation
Pricing
Resources
Mortality risk
Government
Borrowing
Mortality
Public debt
Bond market
Referendum
Public services

Keywords

  • pensions
  • bonds
  • Scottish independence
  • risk pooling
  • mortality rates

Cite this

@article{92326988109841619b6ab6cbe3caed50,
title = "Funding pensions in Scotland: would independence matter?",
abstract = "Economic issues will be key determinants of the outcome of the Scottish referendum on independence. Pensions are a key element of the economic case for or against independence. The costs of funding pensions in an independent Scotland would be influenced by mortality risks, the costs of borrowing and the segmentation of costs and risks (i.e. pricing to Scotland's experience rather than pooled across UK experience). We compare the overall costs of providing pensions in an independent Scotland against the resources that are available to cover these costs. Scotland has worse mortality experience than the UK as a whole, and Scottish government debt is likely to attract a liquidity premium relative to UK government debt. An independent Scottish government would have to create a bond market for public debt. The liquidity premium would make pensions cheaper to buy, but taxpayers or the consumers of public services would have to pay the cost.",
keywords = "pensions, bonds, Scottish independence, risk pooling, mortality rates",
author = "David Bell and David Comerford and David Eiser",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/002795011422700104",
language = "English",
volume = "227",
pages = "R21--R31",
journal = "National Institute Economic Review",
issn = "0027-9501",
number = "1",

}

Funding pensions in Scotland : would independence matter? / Bell, David; Comerford, David; Eiser, David.

In: National Institute Economic Review, Vol. 227, No. 1, 01.02.2014, p. R21-R31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Funding pensions in Scotland

T2 - National Institute Economic Review

AU - Bell, David

AU - Comerford, David

AU - Eiser, David

PY - 2014/2/1

Y1 - 2014/2/1

N2 - Economic issues will be key determinants of the outcome of the Scottish referendum on independence. Pensions are a key element of the economic case for or against independence. The costs of funding pensions in an independent Scotland would be influenced by mortality risks, the costs of borrowing and the segmentation of costs and risks (i.e. pricing to Scotland's experience rather than pooled across UK experience). We compare the overall costs of providing pensions in an independent Scotland against the resources that are available to cover these costs. Scotland has worse mortality experience than the UK as a whole, and Scottish government debt is likely to attract a liquidity premium relative to UK government debt. An independent Scottish government would have to create a bond market for public debt. The liquidity premium would make pensions cheaper to buy, but taxpayers or the consumers of public services would have to pay the cost.

AB - Economic issues will be key determinants of the outcome of the Scottish referendum on independence. Pensions are a key element of the economic case for or against independence. The costs of funding pensions in an independent Scotland would be influenced by mortality risks, the costs of borrowing and the segmentation of costs and risks (i.e. pricing to Scotland's experience rather than pooled across UK experience). We compare the overall costs of providing pensions in an independent Scotland against the resources that are available to cover these costs. Scotland has worse mortality experience than the UK as a whole, and Scottish government debt is likely to attract a liquidity premium relative to UK government debt. An independent Scottish government would have to create a bond market for public debt. The liquidity premium would make pensions cheaper to buy, but taxpayers or the consumers of public services would have to pay the cost.

KW - pensions

KW - bonds

KW - Scottish independence

KW - risk pooling

KW - mortality rates

U2 - 10.1177/002795011422700104

DO - 10.1177/002795011422700104

M3 - Article

VL - 227

SP - R21-R31

JO - National Institute Economic Review

JF - National Institute Economic Review

SN - 0027-9501

IS - 1

ER -