Funding civil justice in Scotland: full cost recovery, at what cost to justice?

Ben Christman, Malcolm M. Combe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In Scotland, there has been an increasing trend for the costs associated with the administration of civil justice to be met by the users of the court system. Such a policy can broadly be referred to as “full cost recovery”. A recent Scottish Government consultation on court fees uncritically continued with this overall approach, but various consultees nevertheless took the opportunity to critique full cost recovery in the context of that consultation and more generally. This article takes up that analysis, in a manner that should also be of interest to non-Scottish readers who may be contending with a similar challenge in another jurisdiction, by critiquing full cost recovery in principle and by offering potential routes by which its implementation might be challenged. It begins by explaining what full cost recovery actually is and investigating its origins, before interrogating some of the assumptions or acquiescence that seems to have developed around the issue and discussing the potential for litigation against court fees in Scotland..

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-73
Number of pages25
JournalEdinburgh Law Review
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jan 2020

Fingerprint

cost recovery
funding
justice
costs
fee
jurisdiction
Funding
Costs
Recovery
Justice
Scotland
trend

Keywords

  • civil justice system
  • full cost recovery
  • Scottish law

Cite this

@article{74ff49edbbf84bcaae0708ed7d591781,
title = "Funding civil justice in Scotland: full cost recovery, at what cost to justice?",
abstract = "In Scotland, there has been an increasing trend for the costs associated with the administration of civil justice to be met by the users of the court system. Such a policy can broadly be referred to as “full cost recovery”. A recent Scottish Government consultation on court fees uncritically continued with this overall approach, but various consultees nevertheless took the opportunity to critique full cost recovery in the context of that consultation and more generally. This article takes up that analysis, in a manner that should also be of interest to non-Scottish readers who may be contending with a similar challenge in another jurisdiction, by critiquing full cost recovery in principle and by offering potential routes by which its implementation might be challenged. It begins by explaining what full cost recovery actually is and investigating its origins, before interrogating some of the assumptions or acquiescence that seems to have developed around the issue and discussing the potential for litigation against court fees in Scotland..",
keywords = "civil justice system, full cost recovery, Scottish law",
author = "Ben Christman and Combe, {Malcolm M.}",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "15",
doi = "10.3366/elr.2020.0599",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "49--73",
journal = "Edinburgh Law Review",
issn = "1364-9809",
publisher = "Edinburgh University Press",
number = "1",

}

Funding civil justice in Scotland : full cost recovery, at what cost to justice? / Christman, Ben; Combe, Malcolm M.

In: Edinburgh Law Review, Vol. 24, No. 1, 15.01.2020, p. 49-73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Funding civil justice in Scotland

T2 - full cost recovery, at what cost to justice?

AU - Christman, Ben

AU - Combe, Malcolm M.

PY - 2020/1/15

Y1 - 2020/1/15

N2 - In Scotland, there has been an increasing trend for the costs associated with the administration of civil justice to be met by the users of the court system. Such a policy can broadly be referred to as “full cost recovery”. A recent Scottish Government consultation on court fees uncritically continued with this overall approach, but various consultees nevertheless took the opportunity to critique full cost recovery in the context of that consultation and more generally. This article takes up that analysis, in a manner that should also be of interest to non-Scottish readers who may be contending with a similar challenge in another jurisdiction, by critiquing full cost recovery in principle and by offering potential routes by which its implementation might be challenged. It begins by explaining what full cost recovery actually is and investigating its origins, before interrogating some of the assumptions or acquiescence that seems to have developed around the issue and discussing the potential for litigation against court fees in Scotland..

AB - In Scotland, there has been an increasing trend for the costs associated with the administration of civil justice to be met by the users of the court system. Such a policy can broadly be referred to as “full cost recovery”. A recent Scottish Government consultation on court fees uncritically continued with this overall approach, but various consultees nevertheless took the opportunity to critique full cost recovery in the context of that consultation and more generally. This article takes up that analysis, in a manner that should also be of interest to non-Scottish readers who may be contending with a similar challenge in another jurisdiction, by critiquing full cost recovery in principle and by offering potential routes by which its implementation might be challenged. It begins by explaining what full cost recovery actually is and investigating its origins, before interrogating some of the assumptions or acquiescence that seems to have developed around the issue and discussing the potential for litigation against court fees in Scotland..

KW - civil justice system

KW - full cost recovery

KW - Scottish law

UR - https://www.euppublishing.com/loi/elr

U2 - 10.3366/elr.2020.0599

DO - 10.3366/elr.2020.0599

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 49

EP - 73

JO - Edinburgh Law Review

JF - Edinburgh Law Review

SN - 1364-9809

IS - 1

ER -