Funding APCs from the research funder's seat: findings from the EC FP7 Post-Grant Open Access Pilot

Pablo de Castro, Gwen Franck

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Some way already into the transition towards a fully Open Access scholarly communications landscape, it is useful to take a look at the findings arising from a pioneering pilot initiative launched by the European Commission to fund Article Processing Charges (APCs) associated to publications stemming from finished European FP7 projects. The article describes the methodology and results for the initiative. It also argues that beyond the flavour of the specific Open Access policy chosen by specific countries, this kind of supranational APC funding initiative could become a key element – alongside instruments like national-level offsetting agreements – to ensure a level playing field for researchers. It’s finally argued that the no-hybrid policy applied in the implementation of this APC funding initiative is a suitable mechanism to contain the costs and prevent further publishing market concentration.

    Detailed results are provided for the close to 3-year funding exercise, showing for instance the widespread uptake across EU countries albeit with significant differences across regions. Funded publishers and journal titles are analysed, together with the evolution of the average APC fee. A summary of lessons learnt is offered at the end of the paper, both for institutions and funders.
    LanguageEnglish
    Article numbere280413
    Number of pages17
    JournalEl Profesional de la Información (EPI)
    Volume28
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 9 Aug 2019

    Fingerprint

    open access
    Seats
    European Community
    grant
    funding
    Processing
    European Commission
    fee
    Flavors
    communications
    EU
    methodology
    market
    costs
    Communication
    Costs

    Keywords

    • open access
    • gold open access
    • article processing charges
    • APC
    • research publishing
    • scholarly communications
    • open science
    • open scholarship
    • open research

    Cite this

    @article{c8e1020767c74ca69e23f629d4726505,
    title = "Funding APCs from the research funder's seat: findings from the EC FP7 Post-Grant Open Access Pilot",
    abstract = "Some way already into the transition towards a fully Open Access scholarly communications landscape, it is useful to take a look at the findings arising from a pioneering pilot initiative launched by the European Commission to fund Article Processing Charges (APCs) associated to publications stemming from finished European FP7 projects. The article describes the methodology and results for the initiative. It also argues that beyond the flavour of the specific Open Access policy chosen by specific countries, this kind of supranational APC funding initiative could become a key element – alongside instruments like national-level offsetting agreements – to ensure a level playing field for researchers. It’s finally argued that the no-hybrid policy applied in the implementation of this APC funding initiative is a suitable mechanism to contain the costs and prevent further publishing market concentration.Detailed results are provided for the close to 3-year funding exercise, showing for instance the widespread uptake across EU countries albeit with significant differences across regions. Funded publishers and journal titles are analysed, together with the evolution of the average APC fee. A summary of lessons learnt is offered at the end of the paper, both for institutions and funders.",
    keywords = "open access, gold open access, article processing charges, APC, research publishing, scholarly communications, open science, open scholarship, open research",
    author = "{de Castro}, Pablo and Gwen Franck",
    year = "2019",
    month = "8",
    day = "9",
    doi = "10.3145/epi.2019.jul.13",
    language = "English",
    volume = "28",
    number = "4",

    }

    Funding APCs from the research funder's seat : findings from the EC FP7 Post-Grant Open Access Pilot. / de Castro, Pablo; Franck, Gwen.

    Vol. 28, No. 4, e280413, 09.08.2019.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Funding APCs from the research funder's seat

    T2 - findings from the EC FP7 Post-Grant Open Access Pilot

    AU - de Castro, Pablo

    AU - Franck, Gwen

    PY - 2019/8/9

    Y1 - 2019/8/9

    N2 - Some way already into the transition towards a fully Open Access scholarly communications landscape, it is useful to take a look at the findings arising from a pioneering pilot initiative launched by the European Commission to fund Article Processing Charges (APCs) associated to publications stemming from finished European FP7 projects. The article describes the methodology and results for the initiative. It also argues that beyond the flavour of the specific Open Access policy chosen by specific countries, this kind of supranational APC funding initiative could become a key element – alongside instruments like national-level offsetting agreements – to ensure a level playing field for researchers. It’s finally argued that the no-hybrid policy applied in the implementation of this APC funding initiative is a suitable mechanism to contain the costs and prevent further publishing market concentration.Detailed results are provided for the close to 3-year funding exercise, showing for instance the widespread uptake across EU countries albeit with significant differences across regions. Funded publishers and journal titles are analysed, together with the evolution of the average APC fee. A summary of lessons learnt is offered at the end of the paper, both for institutions and funders.

    AB - Some way already into the transition towards a fully Open Access scholarly communications landscape, it is useful to take a look at the findings arising from a pioneering pilot initiative launched by the European Commission to fund Article Processing Charges (APCs) associated to publications stemming from finished European FP7 projects. The article describes the methodology and results for the initiative. It also argues that beyond the flavour of the specific Open Access policy chosen by specific countries, this kind of supranational APC funding initiative could become a key element – alongside instruments like national-level offsetting agreements – to ensure a level playing field for researchers. It’s finally argued that the no-hybrid policy applied in the implementation of this APC funding initiative is a suitable mechanism to contain the costs and prevent further publishing market concentration.Detailed results are provided for the close to 3-year funding exercise, showing for instance the widespread uptake across EU countries albeit with significant differences across regions. Funded publishers and journal titles are analysed, together with the evolution of the average APC fee. A summary of lessons learnt is offered at the end of the paper, both for institutions and funders.

    KW - open access

    KW - gold open access

    KW - article processing charges

    KW - APC

    KW - research publishing

    KW - scholarly communications

    KW - open science

    KW - open scholarship

    KW - open research

    U2 - 10.3145/epi.2019.jul.13

    DO - 10.3145/epi.2019.jul.13

    M3 - Article

    VL - 28

    IS - 4

    M1 - e280413

    ER -