Functional strength training and movement performance therapy produce analogous improvement in sit-to-stand early after stroke: early-phase randomised controlled trial

A. Kerr, A. Clark, E.V. Cooke, P. Rowe, V.M. Pomeroy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives Restoring independence in the sit-to-stand (STS) task is an important objective for stroke rehabilitation. It is not known if a particular intervention, strength training or therapy focused on movement performance is more likely to improve STS recovery. This study aimed to compare STS outcomes from functional strength training, movement performance therapy and conventional therapy.Design Randomised controlled trial.Setting Acute stroke units.Participants Medically well patients (n = 93) with recent (<42 days) stroke. The mean age of patients was 68.8 years, mean time post ictus was 33.5 days, 54 (58%) were male, 20 showed neglect (22%) and 37 (40%) had a left-sided brain lesion.Interventions Six weeks of either conventional therapy, functional strength training or movement performance therapy. Subjects were allocated to groups on a random basis.Main outcome measures STS ability, timing, symmetry, co-ordination, smoothness and knee velocity were measured at baseline, outcome (after 6 weeks of intervention) and follow-up (3 months after outcome).Results No significant differences were found between the groups. All three groups improved their STS ability, with 88% able to STS at follow-up compared with 56% at baseline. Few differences were noted in quality of movement, with only symmetry when rising showing significantly greater improvement in the movement performance therapy group; this benefit was not evident at follow-up.Conclusions Recovery of the STS movement is consistently good during stroke rehabilitation, irrespective of the type of therapy experienced. Changes in quality of movement did not differ according to group allocation, indicating that the type of therapy is less important.Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT00322192.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages5
JournalPhysiotherapy
Early online date11 Feb 2016
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 11 Feb 2016

Fingerprint

Resistance Training
Randomized Controlled Trials
Stroke
Aptitude
Patient rehabilitation
Therapeutics
Recovery
Group Psychotherapy
Brain
Knee
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Clinical Trials

Keywords

  • sit-to-stand
  • functional strength training
  • physiotherapy
  • movement quality
  • randomised controlled trial

Cite this

@article{a09230c1543f47fe810a6d8e6ffbbeec,
title = "Functional strength training and movement performance therapy produce analogous improvement in sit-to-stand early after stroke: early-phase randomised controlled trial",
abstract = "Objectives Restoring independence in the sit-to-stand (STS) task is an important objective for stroke rehabilitation. It is not known if a particular intervention, strength training or therapy focused on movement performance is more likely to improve STS recovery. This study aimed to compare STS outcomes from functional strength training, movement performance therapy and conventional therapy.Design Randomised controlled trial.Setting Acute stroke units.Participants Medically well patients (n = 93) with recent (<42 days) stroke. The mean age of patients was 68.8 years, mean time post ictus was 33.5 days, 54 (58{\%}) were male, 20 showed neglect (22{\%}) and 37 (40{\%}) had a left-sided brain lesion.Interventions Six weeks of either conventional therapy, functional strength training or movement performance therapy. Subjects were allocated to groups on a random basis.Main outcome measures STS ability, timing, symmetry, co-ordination, smoothness and knee velocity were measured at baseline, outcome (after 6 weeks of intervention) and follow-up (3 months after outcome).Results No significant differences were found between the groups. All three groups improved their STS ability, with 88{\%} able to STS at follow-up compared with 56{\%} at baseline. Few differences were noted in quality of movement, with only symmetry when rising showing significantly greater improvement in the movement performance therapy group; this benefit was not evident at follow-up.Conclusions Recovery of the STS movement is consistently good during stroke rehabilitation, irrespective of the type of therapy experienced. Changes in quality of movement did not differ according to group allocation, indicating that the type of therapy is less important.Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT00322192.",
keywords = "sit-to-stand, functional strength training, physiotherapy, movement quality, randomised controlled trial",
author = "A. Kerr and A. Clark and E.V. Cooke and P. Rowe and V.M. Pomeroy",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.physio.2015.12.006",
language = "English",
journal = "Physiotherapy",
issn = "0031-9406",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Functional strength training and movement performance therapy produce analogous improvement in sit-to-stand early after stroke

T2 - Physiotherapy

AU - Kerr, A.

AU - Clark, A.

AU - Cooke, E.V.

AU - Rowe, P.

AU - Pomeroy, V.M.

PY - 2016/2/11

Y1 - 2016/2/11

N2 - Objectives Restoring independence in the sit-to-stand (STS) task is an important objective for stroke rehabilitation. It is not known if a particular intervention, strength training or therapy focused on movement performance is more likely to improve STS recovery. This study aimed to compare STS outcomes from functional strength training, movement performance therapy and conventional therapy.Design Randomised controlled trial.Setting Acute stroke units.Participants Medically well patients (n = 93) with recent (<42 days) stroke. The mean age of patients was 68.8 years, mean time post ictus was 33.5 days, 54 (58%) were male, 20 showed neglect (22%) and 37 (40%) had a left-sided brain lesion.Interventions Six weeks of either conventional therapy, functional strength training or movement performance therapy. Subjects were allocated to groups on a random basis.Main outcome measures STS ability, timing, symmetry, co-ordination, smoothness and knee velocity were measured at baseline, outcome (after 6 weeks of intervention) and follow-up (3 months after outcome).Results No significant differences were found between the groups. All three groups improved their STS ability, with 88% able to STS at follow-up compared with 56% at baseline. Few differences were noted in quality of movement, with only symmetry when rising showing significantly greater improvement in the movement performance therapy group; this benefit was not evident at follow-up.Conclusions Recovery of the STS movement is consistently good during stroke rehabilitation, irrespective of the type of therapy experienced. Changes in quality of movement did not differ according to group allocation, indicating that the type of therapy is less important.Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT00322192.

AB - Objectives Restoring independence in the sit-to-stand (STS) task is an important objective for stroke rehabilitation. It is not known if a particular intervention, strength training or therapy focused on movement performance is more likely to improve STS recovery. This study aimed to compare STS outcomes from functional strength training, movement performance therapy and conventional therapy.Design Randomised controlled trial.Setting Acute stroke units.Participants Medically well patients (n = 93) with recent (<42 days) stroke. The mean age of patients was 68.8 years, mean time post ictus was 33.5 days, 54 (58%) were male, 20 showed neglect (22%) and 37 (40%) had a left-sided brain lesion.Interventions Six weeks of either conventional therapy, functional strength training or movement performance therapy. Subjects were allocated to groups on a random basis.Main outcome measures STS ability, timing, symmetry, co-ordination, smoothness and knee velocity were measured at baseline, outcome (after 6 weeks of intervention) and follow-up (3 months after outcome).Results No significant differences were found between the groups. All three groups improved their STS ability, with 88% able to STS at follow-up compared with 56% at baseline. Few differences were noted in quality of movement, with only symmetry when rising showing significantly greater improvement in the movement performance therapy group; this benefit was not evident at follow-up.Conclusions Recovery of the STS movement is consistently good during stroke rehabilitation, irrespective of the type of therapy experienced. Changes in quality of movement did not differ according to group allocation, indicating that the type of therapy is less important.Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT00322192.

KW - sit-to-stand

KW - functional strength training

KW - physiotherapy

KW - movement quality

KW - randomised controlled trial

UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031940616000286

U2 - 10.1016/j.physio.2015.12.006

DO - 10.1016/j.physio.2015.12.006

M3 - Article

JO - Physiotherapy

JF - Physiotherapy

SN - 0031-9406

ER -