Abstract
The pluralistic approach to therapy that we have articulated is grounded in ethics, and strives to develop therapists' abilities to engage with clients in deeply respectful and valuing ways. In this article, we argue that a principle obstacle to such engagements can be a tendency in the psychological therapies to hold either/or, polarised positions, such that we are not fully open to the complexity and diversity of the actual clients that we encounter. This article focuses on three particular polarisations: between advocates of different orientations, between integrative/eclectic versus single orientation practices and between client-led versus therapist-led practices. The article argues that a pluralistic approach may be able to overcome such schisms, and discusses the implications and limits of this perspective for therapeutic thinking and practice.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 5-17 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2012 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- pluralistic therapy
- meta‐therapeutic dialogue
- therapeutic alliance
- humanistic psychotherapy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'From either/or to both/and: developing a pluralistic approach to counselling and psychotherapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 23 Citations
- 1 Keynote
-
A radical responsiveness to client as other: developing a pluralistic approach to counselling and psychotherapy
Cooper, M., 12 Nov 2011, (Unpublished).Research output: Contribution to conference › Keynote
File
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver