From either/or to both/and

developing a pluralistic approach to counselling and psychotherapy

M. Cooper, J. McLeod

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The pluralistic approach to therapy that we have articulated is grounded in ethics, and strives to develop therapists' abilities to engage with clients in deeply respectful and valuing ways. In this article, we argue that a principle obstacle to such engagements can be a tendency in the psychological therapies to hold either/or, polarised positions, such that we are not fully open to the complexity and diversity of the actual clients that we encounter. This article focuses on three particular polarisations: between advocates of different orientations, between integrative/eclectic versus single orientation practices and between client-led versus therapist-led practices. The article argues that a pluralistic approach may be able to overcome such schisms, and discusses the implications and limits of this perspective for therapeutic thinking and practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-17
Number of pages13
JournalEuropean Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Psychotherapy
Counseling
Aptitude
Ethics
Therapeutics
Psychology
Thinking

Keywords

  • pluralistic therapy
  • meta‐therapeutic dialogue
  • therapeutic alliance
  • humanistic psychotherapy

Cite this

@article{bc63639d3c6840eea00f7af780111990,
title = "From either/or to both/and: developing a pluralistic approach to counselling and psychotherapy",
abstract = "The pluralistic approach to therapy that we have articulated is grounded in ethics, and strives to develop therapists' abilities to engage with clients in deeply respectful and valuing ways. In this article, we argue that a principle obstacle to such engagements can be a tendency in the psychological therapies to hold either/or, polarised positions, such that we are not fully open to the complexity and diversity of the actual clients that we encounter. This article focuses on three particular polarisations: between advocates of different orientations, between integrative/eclectic versus single orientation practices and between client-led versus therapist-led practices. The article argues that a pluralistic approach may be able to overcome such schisms, and discusses the implications and limits of this perspective for therapeutic thinking and practice.",
keywords = "pluralistic therapy, meta‐therapeutic dialogue, therapeutic alliance, humanistic psychotherapy",
author = "M. Cooper and J. McLeod",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13642537.2012.652389",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "5--17",
journal = "European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling",
issn = "1364-2537",
number = "1",

}

From either/or to both/and : developing a pluralistic approach to counselling and psychotherapy. / Cooper, M.; McLeod, J.

In: European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling, Vol. 14, No. 1, 01.03.2012, p. 5-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - From either/or to both/and

T2 - developing a pluralistic approach to counselling and psychotherapy

AU - Cooper, M.

AU - McLeod, J.

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - The pluralistic approach to therapy that we have articulated is grounded in ethics, and strives to develop therapists' abilities to engage with clients in deeply respectful and valuing ways. In this article, we argue that a principle obstacle to such engagements can be a tendency in the psychological therapies to hold either/or, polarised positions, such that we are not fully open to the complexity and diversity of the actual clients that we encounter. This article focuses on three particular polarisations: between advocates of different orientations, between integrative/eclectic versus single orientation practices and between client-led versus therapist-led practices. The article argues that a pluralistic approach may be able to overcome such schisms, and discusses the implications and limits of this perspective for therapeutic thinking and practice.

AB - The pluralistic approach to therapy that we have articulated is grounded in ethics, and strives to develop therapists' abilities to engage with clients in deeply respectful and valuing ways. In this article, we argue that a principle obstacle to such engagements can be a tendency in the psychological therapies to hold either/or, polarised positions, such that we are not fully open to the complexity and diversity of the actual clients that we encounter. This article focuses on three particular polarisations: between advocates of different orientations, between integrative/eclectic versus single orientation practices and between client-led versus therapist-led practices. The article argues that a pluralistic approach may be able to overcome such schisms, and discusses the implications and limits of this perspective for therapeutic thinking and practice.

KW - pluralistic therapy

KW - meta‐therapeutic dialogue

KW - therapeutic alliance

KW - humanistic psychotherapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858171406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13642537.2012.652389

DO - 10.1080/13642537.2012.652389

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 5

EP - 17

JO - European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling

JF - European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling

SN - 1364-2537

IS - 1

ER -