From conditionality to Europeanization in Central and Eastern Europe: administrative performance and capacity in cohesion policy

John Bachtler, Carlos Mendez, Hildegard Oraže

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article assesses the role of administrative capacity in explaining the performance of eight Central and Eastern European countries (EU8) in managing and implementing Cohesion policy over the 2004-08 period. Drawing on a conceptual framework from the Europeanization literature, it explores whether pre-accession administrative adjustment to comply with the acquis continued in the post-accession period, against a backdrop of critical assessments about the state of administrative capacity for managing Cohesion policy. We conclude that administrative capacity was developed faster and more substantially than commentators predicted at the time of accession. The findings have important implications for our understanding of the post-accession compliance record of the EU8, challenging the contention that they fall within a ‘world of dead letters’. We argue that administrative capacity, as a rationalist mediating factor of Europeanization, has been underestimated and that insufficient attention has been given to the dynamics of capacity evolution and the role of learning.
LanguageEnglish
Pages735-757
Number of pages23
JournalEuropean Planning Studies
Volume22
Issue number4
Early online date1 Mar 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

conditionality
Europeanization
group cohesion
Central Europe
cohesion
Eastern Europe
conceptual framework
performance
compliance
learning
policy

Keywords

  • cohesion policy
  • structural funds
  • European integration
  • conditionality

Cite this

@article{fc4bf40da82947f8b212cf43c6c93dec,
title = "From conditionality to Europeanization in Central and Eastern Europe: administrative performance and capacity in cohesion policy",
abstract = "This article assesses the role of administrative capacity in explaining the performance of eight Central and Eastern European countries (EU8) in managing and implementing Cohesion policy over the 2004-08 period. Drawing on a conceptual framework from the Europeanization literature, it explores whether pre-accession administrative adjustment to comply with the acquis continued in the post-accession period, against a backdrop of critical assessments about the state of administrative capacity for managing Cohesion policy. We conclude that administrative capacity was developed faster and more substantially than commentators predicted at the time of accession. The findings have important implications for our understanding of the post-accession compliance record of the EU8, challenging the contention that they fall within a ‘world of dead letters’. We argue that administrative capacity, as a rationalist mediating factor of Europeanization, has been underestimated and that insufficient attention has been given to the dynamics of capacity evolution and the role of learning.",
keywords = "cohesion policy, structural funds, European integration, conditionality",
author = "John Bachtler and Carlos Mendez and Hildegard Oraže",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/09654313.2013.772744",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "735--757",
journal = "European Planning Studies",
issn = "0965-4313",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - From conditionality to Europeanization in Central and Eastern Europe

T2 - European Planning Studies

AU - Bachtler, John

AU - Mendez, Carlos

AU - Oraže, Hildegard

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This article assesses the role of administrative capacity in explaining the performance of eight Central and Eastern European countries (EU8) in managing and implementing Cohesion policy over the 2004-08 period. Drawing on a conceptual framework from the Europeanization literature, it explores whether pre-accession administrative adjustment to comply with the acquis continued in the post-accession period, against a backdrop of critical assessments about the state of administrative capacity for managing Cohesion policy. We conclude that administrative capacity was developed faster and more substantially than commentators predicted at the time of accession. The findings have important implications for our understanding of the post-accession compliance record of the EU8, challenging the contention that they fall within a ‘world of dead letters’. We argue that administrative capacity, as a rationalist mediating factor of Europeanization, has been underestimated and that insufficient attention has been given to the dynamics of capacity evolution and the role of learning.

AB - This article assesses the role of administrative capacity in explaining the performance of eight Central and Eastern European countries (EU8) in managing and implementing Cohesion policy over the 2004-08 period. Drawing on a conceptual framework from the Europeanization literature, it explores whether pre-accession administrative adjustment to comply with the acquis continued in the post-accession period, against a backdrop of critical assessments about the state of administrative capacity for managing Cohesion policy. We conclude that administrative capacity was developed faster and more substantially than commentators predicted at the time of accession. The findings have important implications for our understanding of the post-accession compliance record of the EU8, challenging the contention that they fall within a ‘world of dead letters’. We argue that administrative capacity, as a rationalist mediating factor of Europeanization, has been underestimated and that insufficient attention has been given to the dynamics of capacity evolution and the role of learning.

KW - cohesion policy

KW - structural funds

KW - European integration

KW - conditionality

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ceps20#.Uon6Nie2iEo

U2 - 10.1080/09654313.2013.772744

DO - 10.1080/09654313.2013.772744

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 735

EP - 757

JO - European Planning Studies

JF - European Planning Studies

SN - 0965-4313

IS - 4

ER -