Freedom of information and ‘vexatious’ requests — The case of Scottish local government

Morag Cherry, David McMenemy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)
355 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper investigates the cost and incidence of Freedom of Information (FOI) requests within local authorities in Scotland and in particular, the cost and incidence of requests which have been defined as ‘vexatious’ in order to investigate if the negative perceptions surrounding the cost and misuse of the legislation are justified. Additionally, the criteria and guidelines that local authorities are using to define ‘vexatious’ are also examined. The approach taken to the research in this study is a survey of the 32 local authorities in Scotland using freedom of information requests as the data collection method.
The findings from the survey revealed that none of the local authorities were keeping records of costs relating to FOI requests. However, 80% were keeping records of numbers of requests. One third of authorities that kept records of ‘vexatious’ requests had experienced such a request. However, the actual number of ‘vexatious’ requests received were extremely low.
The findings highlight the difficulties in recording cost data and the general lack of record keeping within organisations. The findings also indicate a very low incidence of ‘vexatious’ requests and suggest that the ‘vexatious’ definition may be applied inappropriately by public authorities.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)257–266
Number of pages10
JournalGovernment Information Quarterly
Volume30
Issue number3
Early online date11 May 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2013

Keywords

  • exemptions
  • freedom of information
  • vexatious requests

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Freedom of information and ‘vexatious’ requests — The case of Scottish local government'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this