Frameworks for Priority Setting in Health and Social Care

Marissa Collins, Neil McHugh, Rachel Baker, Alec Morton, Lucy Frith, Keith Syrett, Cam Donaldson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingEntry for encyclopedia/dictionary

Abstract

Health and social care organizations work within the context of limited resources. Different techniques to aid resource allocation and decision-making exist and are important as scarcity of resources in health and social care is inescapable. Healthcare systems, regardless of how they are organized, must decide what services to provide given the resources available. This is particularly clear in systems funded by taxation, which have limited budgets and other limited resources (staff, skills, facilities, etc.) and in which the claims on these resources outstrip supply.

Healthcare spending in many countries is not expected to increase over the short or medium term. Therefore, frameworks to set priorities are increasingly required. Four disciplines provide perspectives on priority setting: economics, decision analysis, ethics, and law. Although there is overlap amongst these perspectives, they are underpinned by different principles and processes for priority setting. As the values and viewpoints of those involved in priority setting in health and social care will differ, it is important to consider how these could be included to inform a priority setting process. It is proposed that these perspectives and the consideration of values and viewpoints could be brought together in a combined priority setting framework for use within local health and social care organizations.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationOxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance
Place of Publication[New York]
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2019

Publication series

NameOxford Research Encyclopedias
PublisherOxford University Press

Fingerprint

Resources
Priority setting
Social care
Healthcare
Work organization
Economics
Decision analysis
Health care system
Taxation
Staff
Decision making
Resource allocation
Scarcity

Keywords

  • health economics
  • ethics
  • law
  • decision science
  • priority setting
  • scarce resources

Cite this

Collins, M., McHugh, N., Baker, R., Morton, A., Frith, L., Syrett, K., & Donaldson, C. (2019). Frameworks for Priority Setting in Health and Social Care. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance (Oxford Research Encyclopedias). [New York]. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.013.279
Collins, Marissa ; McHugh, Neil ; Baker, Rachel ; Morton, Alec ; Frith, Lucy ; Syrett, Keith ; Donaldson, Cam . / Frameworks for Priority Setting in Health and Social Care. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance. [New York], 2019. (Oxford Research Encyclopedias).
@inbook{3696ec01bee1412d8b74166aeb7ef6dd,
title = "Frameworks for Priority Setting in Health and Social Care",
abstract = "Health and social care organizations work within the context of limited resources. Different techniques to aid resource allocation and decision-making exist and are important as scarcity of resources in health and social care is inescapable. Healthcare systems, regardless of how they are organized, must decide what services to provide given the resources available. This is particularly clear in systems funded by taxation, which have limited budgets and other limited resources (staff, skills, facilities, etc.) and in which the claims on these resources outstrip supply.Healthcare spending in many countries is not expected to increase over the short or medium term. Therefore, frameworks to set priorities are increasingly required. Four disciplines provide perspectives on priority setting: economics, decision analysis, ethics, and law. Although there is overlap amongst these perspectives, they are underpinned by different principles and processes for priority setting. As the values and viewpoints of those involved in priority setting in health and social care will differ, it is important to consider how these could be included to inform a priority setting process. It is proposed that these perspectives and the consideration of values and viewpoints could be brought together in a combined priority setting framework for use within local health and social care organizations.",
keywords = "health economics, ethics, law, decision science, priority setting, scarce resources",
author = "Marissa Collins and Neil McHugh and Rachel Baker and Alec Morton and Lucy Frith and Keith Syrett and Cam Donaldson",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.013.279",
language = "English",
series = "Oxford Research Encyclopedias",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
booktitle = "Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance",

}

Collins, M, McHugh, N, Baker, R, Morton, A, Frith, L, Syrett, K & Donaldson, C 2019, Frameworks for Priority Setting in Health and Social Care. in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance. Oxford Research Encyclopedias, [New York]. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.013.279

Frameworks for Priority Setting in Health and Social Care. / Collins, Marissa; McHugh, Neil ; Baker, Rachel ; Morton, Alec; Frith, Lucy; Syrett, Keith ; Donaldson, Cam .

Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance. [New York], 2019. (Oxford Research Encyclopedias).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingEntry for encyclopedia/dictionary

TY - CHAP

T1 - Frameworks for Priority Setting in Health and Social Care

AU - Collins, Marissa

AU - McHugh, Neil

AU - Baker, Rachel

AU - Morton, Alec

AU - Frith, Lucy

AU - Syrett, Keith

AU - Donaldson, Cam

PY - 2019/3/31

Y1 - 2019/3/31

N2 - Health and social care organizations work within the context of limited resources. Different techniques to aid resource allocation and decision-making exist and are important as scarcity of resources in health and social care is inescapable. Healthcare systems, regardless of how they are organized, must decide what services to provide given the resources available. This is particularly clear in systems funded by taxation, which have limited budgets and other limited resources (staff, skills, facilities, etc.) and in which the claims on these resources outstrip supply.Healthcare spending in many countries is not expected to increase over the short or medium term. Therefore, frameworks to set priorities are increasingly required. Four disciplines provide perspectives on priority setting: economics, decision analysis, ethics, and law. Although there is overlap amongst these perspectives, they are underpinned by different principles and processes for priority setting. As the values and viewpoints of those involved in priority setting in health and social care will differ, it is important to consider how these could be included to inform a priority setting process. It is proposed that these perspectives and the consideration of values and viewpoints could be brought together in a combined priority setting framework for use within local health and social care organizations.

AB - Health and social care organizations work within the context of limited resources. Different techniques to aid resource allocation and decision-making exist and are important as scarcity of resources in health and social care is inescapable. Healthcare systems, regardless of how they are organized, must decide what services to provide given the resources available. This is particularly clear in systems funded by taxation, which have limited budgets and other limited resources (staff, skills, facilities, etc.) and in which the claims on these resources outstrip supply.Healthcare spending in many countries is not expected to increase over the short or medium term. Therefore, frameworks to set priorities are increasingly required. Four disciplines provide perspectives on priority setting: economics, decision analysis, ethics, and law. Although there is overlap amongst these perspectives, they are underpinned by different principles and processes for priority setting. As the values and viewpoints of those involved in priority setting in health and social care will differ, it is important to consider how these could be included to inform a priority setting process. It is proposed that these perspectives and the consideration of values and viewpoints could be brought together in a combined priority setting framework for use within local health and social care organizations.

KW - health economics

KW - ethics

KW - law

KW - decision science

KW - priority setting

KW - scarce resources

UR - http://oxfordre.com/economics

U2 - 10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.013.279

DO - 10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.013.279

M3 - Entry for encyclopedia/dictionary

T3 - Oxford Research Encyclopedias

BT - Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance

CY - [New York]

ER -

Collins M, McHugh N, Baker R, Morton A, Frith L, Syrett K et al. Frameworks for Priority Setting in Health and Social Care. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance. [New York]. 2019. (Oxford Research Encyclopedias). https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.013.279