Following the evidence practice: an analysis of evaluation studies on EU railway policy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Since the end of the 1990s, scholars have been paying particular attention to the link between evidence and policy because of the rise of evidence-based policy making and better regulation in the European Union political agenda. Documents such as evaluation studies are material traces of professional practice and the knowledge production process. Through the analytical perspective of evaluation practice, this contribution has two purposes. First, it differentiates three modes of evaluation theory and practice. Second, through a systematic content analysis of 52 evaluation studies of EU railway policy, it presents an overview of general patterns in the use of evaluative theories and practice. Besides contributing to the literature of evidence and policy practice, the article provides recommendations for EU evaluation and better regulation guidelines.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1-19
Number of pages19
JournalPolitische Vierteljahresschrift
Early online date22 Nov 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 22 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

German Federal Railways
EU
evaluation
evidence
regulation
study materials
political agenda
knowledge production
production process
content analysis

Keywords

  • content analysis of evaluation
  • evaluation practice
  • European commission
  • EU railway system
  • knowledge production

Cite this

@article{5b15084bc7104a8e89a3257b4ad1a215,
title = "Following the evidence practice: an analysis of evaluation studies on EU railway policy",
abstract = "Since the end of the 1990s, scholars have been paying particular attention to the link between evidence and policy because of the rise of evidence-based policy making and better regulation in the European Union political agenda. Documents such as evaluation studies are material traces of professional practice and the knowledge production process. Through the analytical perspective of evaluation practice, this contribution has two purposes. First, it differentiates three modes of evaluation theory and practice. Second, through a systematic content analysis of 52 evaluation studies of EU railway policy, it presents an overview of general patterns in the use of evaluative theories and practice. Besides contributing to the literature of evidence and policy practice, the article provides recommendations for EU evaluation and better regulation guidelines.",
keywords = "content analysis of evaluation, evaluation practice, European commission, EU railway system, knowledge production",
author = "{De Francesco}, Fabrizio",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1007/s11615-019-00191-9",
language = "English",
pages = "1--19",

}

Following the evidence practice : an analysis of evaluation studies on EU railway policy. / De Francesco, Fabrizio.

22.11.2019, p. 1-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Following the evidence practice

T2 - an analysis of evaluation studies on EU railway policy

AU - De Francesco, Fabrizio

PY - 2019/11/22

Y1 - 2019/11/22

N2 - Since the end of the 1990s, scholars have been paying particular attention to the link between evidence and policy because of the rise of evidence-based policy making and better regulation in the European Union political agenda. Documents such as evaluation studies are material traces of professional practice and the knowledge production process. Through the analytical perspective of evaluation practice, this contribution has two purposes. First, it differentiates three modes of evaluation theory and practice. Second, through a systematic content analysis of 52 evaluation studies of EU railway policy, it presents an overview of general patterns in the use of evaluative theories and practice. Besides contributing to the literature of evidence and policy practice, the article provides recommendations for EU evaluation and better regulation guidelines.

AB - Since the end of the 1990s, scholars have been paying particular attention to the link between evidence and policy because of the rise of evidence-based policy making and better regulation in the European Union political agenda. Documents such as evaluation studies are material traces of professional practice and the knowledge production process. Through the analytical perspective of evaluation practice, this contribution has two purposes. First, it differentiates three modes of evaluation theory and practice. Second, through a systematic content analysis of 52 evaluation studies of EU railway policy, it presents an overview of general patterns in the use of evaluative theories and practice. Besides contributing to the literature of evidence and policy practice, the article provides recommendations for EU evaluation and better regulation guidelines.

KW - content analysis of evaluation

KW - evaluation practice

KW - European commission

KW - EU railway system

KW - knowledge production

U2 - 10.1007/s11615-019-00191-9

DO - 10.1007/s11615-019-00191-9

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 19

ER -