Focused for some, exploratory for others: job search strategies and successful university-to-work transitions in the context of labor market ambiguity

Belgin Okay-Somerville, Dora Scholarios

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)
29 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article examines the role of student job search strategies that differ in goal-directedness (focused, exploratory, and haphazard) in achieving successful university-to-work transitions (i.e., employment in jobs with high skill use/development and qualification–job match). The relationship between job search and employment outcomes is considered in two labor market contexts—high or low ambiguity—which are represented by the comparison between arts, humanities, and social sciences (AHSS) and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) graduates, respectively. Using two-wave survey data, we find that job search strategies during university do not explain, yet differentially impact, successful outcomes one year after graduation. Fully exploring opportunities was particularly beneficial for STEM graduates (low ambiguity context) and more focused job search was beneficial for AHSS graduates (high ambiguity context). Paradoxically, findings both question and reinforce the efficacy of career agency for overcoming barriers to labor market entry, depending on the job search context. The study contributes to the agency and context debates relevant for school-to-work transitions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)126-143
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Career Development
Volume49
Issue number1
Early online date18 May 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Feb 2022

Keywords

  • school-to-work transitions
  • labour market ambiguity
  • university-to-work transitions
  • graduates
  • career agency
  • job search strategies
  • STEM
  • AHSS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Focused for some, exploratory for others: job search strategies and successful university-to-work transitions in the context of labor market ambiguity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this