Fit for the EU? The Europeanization of sectoral governance in telecommunications and electricity

S.A. Padgett, S. Bulmer, D. Dolowitz, P. Humphreys, K. Dyson (Editor), K. Goetz (Editor)

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter examines the processes and outcomes of Europeanization in the German utilities' sectors. Employing an institutionalist perspective, it focuses on interaction between the institutional system of the EU and that of Germany. Adaptation pressures, it is argued, are reduced by Germany's ability to exert 'soft' power to ensure that EU policy is congruent with domestic governance. The tempo of EU reform is particularly significant. Incremental legislation in telecommunications permitted Germany to liberalize at its own pace in line with domestic policy style. In electricity, by contrast, the 1996 Directive created more acute adaptation pressures. Thus, in telecommunications Germany was activist in 'downloading' EU legislation in line with EU requirements. In electricity, it made considerable use of the zone of discretion in the Directive to minimize the impact on domestic governance. In examining the way in which Germany responds to adaptation pressures, particular attention is given to opportunity structures, veto points, and institutional norms in the domestic policy process. The experience of the electricity reform suggests that adaptation pressures are exacerbated by a highly pluralist institutional regime with numerous veto actors capable of blocking implementation. Moreover, German reluctance to embrace independent, sector-specific regulation suggests the resistance of domestic regulatory norms to the effects of Europeanization.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationGermany and Europe: How Europeanized is Germany? Proceedings of the British Academy/Oxford University Press, 2003
Pages251-69
Number of pages182
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Europeanization
electricity
telecommunication
EU
governance
domestic policy
legislation
reform
EU policy
regime
regulation
ability
interaction
experience

Keywords

  • germany
  • european union
  • liberalization
  • german politics
  • telecommunications sector
  • public utilities
  • privatization

Cite this

Padgett, S. A., Bulmer, S., Dolowitz, D., Humphreys, P., Dyson, K. (Ed.), & Goetz, K. (Ed.) (2003). Fit for the EU? The Europeanization of sectoral governance in telecommunications and electricity. In Germany and Europe: How Europeanized is Germany? Proceedings of the British Academy/Oxford University Press, 2003 (pp. 251-69)
Padgett, S.A. ; Bulmer, S. ; Dolowitz, D. ; Humphreys, P. ; Dyson, K. (Editor) ; Goetz, K. (Editor). / Fit for the EU? The Europeanization of sectoral governance in telecommunications and electricity. Germany and Europe: How Europeanized is Germany? Proceedings of the British Academy/Oxford University Press, 2003. 2003. pp. 251-69
@inbook{b199c2614ffa4785aedaae0022ffe45f,
title = "Fit for the EU? The Europeanization of sectoral governance in telecommunications and electricity",
abstract = "This chapter examines the processes and outcomes of Europeanization in the German utilities' sectors. Employing an institutionalist perspective, it focuses on interaction between the institutional system of the EU and that of Germany. Adaptation pressures, it is argued, are reduced by Germany's ability to exert 'soft' power to ensure that EU policy is congruent with domestic governance. The tempo of EU reform is particularly significant. Incremental legislation in telecommunications permitted Germany to liberalize at its own pace in line with domestic policy style. In electricity, by contrast, the 1996 Directive created more acute adaptation pressures. Thus, in telecommunications Germany was activist in 'downloading' EU legislation in line with EU requirements. In electricity, it made considerable use of the zone of discretion in the Directive to minimize the impact on domestic governance. In examining the way in which Germany responds to adaptation pressures, particular attention is given to opportunity structures, veto points, and institutional norms in the domestic policy process. The experience of the electricity reform suggests that adaptation pressures are exacerbated by a highly pluralist institutional regime with numerous veto actors capable of blocking implementation. Moreover, German reluctance to embrace independent, sector-specific regulation suggests the resistance of domestic regulatory norms to the effects of Europeanization.",
keywords = "germany, european union, liberalization, german politics, telecommunications sector, public utilities, privatization",
author = "S.A. Padgett and S. Bulmer and D. Dolowitz and P. Humphreys and K. Dyson and K. Goetz",
year = "2003",
language = "English",
pages = "251--69",
booktitle = "Germany and Europe: How Europeanized is Germany? Proceedings of the British Academy/Oxford University Press, 2003",

}

Padgett, SA, Bulmer, S, Dolowitz, D, Humphreys, P, Dyson, K (ed.) & Goetz, K (ed.) 2003, Fit for the EU? The Europeanization of sectoral governance in telecommunications and electricity. in Germany and Europe: How Europeanized is Germany? Proceedings of the British Academy/Oxford University Press, 2003. pp. 251-69.

Fit for the EU? The Europeanization of sectoral governance in telecommunications and electricity. / Padgett, S.A.; Bulmer, S.; Dolowitz, D.; Humphreys, P.; Dyson, K. (Editor); Goetz, K. (Editor).

Germany and Europe: How Europeanized is Germany? Proceedings of the British Academy/Oxford University Press, 2003. 2003. p. 251-69.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Fit for the EU? The Europeanization of sectoral governance in telecommunications and electricity

AU - Padgett, S.A.

AU - Bulmer, S.

AU - Dolowitz, D.

AU - Humphreys, P.

A2 - Dyson, K.

A2 - Goetz, K.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - This chapter examines the processes and outcomes of Europeanization in the German utilities' sectors. Employing an institutionalist perspective, it focuses on interaction between the institutional system of the EU and that of Germany. Adaptation pressures, it is argued, are reduced by Germany's ability to exert 'soft' power to ensure that EU policy is congruent with domestic governance. The tempo of EU reform is particularly significant. Incremental legislation in telecommunications permitted Germany to liberalize at its own pace in line with domestic policy style. In electricity, by contrast, the 1996 Directive created more acute adaptation pressures. Thus, in telecommunications Germany was activist in 'downloading' EU legislation in line with EU requirements. In electricity, it made considerable use of the zone of discretion in the Directive to minimize the impact on domestic governance. In examining the way in which Germany responds to adaptation pressures, particular attention is given to opportunity structures, veto points, and institutional norms in the domestic policy process. The experience of the electricity reform suggests that adaptation pressures are exacerbated by a highly pluralist institutional regime with numerous veto actors capable of blocking implementation. Moreover, German reluctance to embrace independent, sector-specific regulation suggests the resistance of domestic regulatory norms to the effects of Europeanization.

AB - This chapter examines the processes and outcomes of Europeanization in the German utilities' sectors. Employing an institutionalist perspective, it focuses on interaction between the institutional system of the EU and that of Germany. Adaptation pressures, it is argued, are reduced by Germany's ability to exert 'soft' power to ensure that EU policy is congruent with domestic governance. The tempo of EU reform is particularly significant. Incremental legislation in telecommunications permitted Germany to liberalize at its own pace in line with domestic policy style. In electricity, by contrast, the 1996 Directive created more acute adaptation pressures. Thus, in telecommunications Germany was activist in 'downloading' EU legislation in line with EU requirements. In electricity, it made considerable use of the zone of discretion in the Directive to minimize the impact on domestic governance. In examining the way in which Germany responds to adaptation pressures, particular attention is given to opportunity structures, veto points, and institutional norms in the domestic policy process. The experience of the electricity reform suggests that adaptation pressures are exacerbated by a highly pluralist institutional regime with numerous veto actors capable of blocking implementation. Moreover, German reluctance to embrace independent, sector-specific regulation suggests the resistance of domestic regulatory norms to the effects of Europeanization.

KW - germany

KW - european union

KW - liberalization

KW - german politics

KW - telecommunications sector

KW - public utilities

KW - privatization

UR - http://www.britac.ac.uk/pubS/src/pbaindex/pba119.html#bulmer

M3 - Chapter

SP - 251

EP - 269

BT - Germany and Europe: How Europeanized is Germany? Proceedings of the British Academy/Oxford University Press, 2003

ER -

Padgett SA, Bulmer S, Dolowitz D, Humphreys P, Dyson K, (ed.), Goetz K, (ed.). Fit for the EU? The Europeanization of sectoral governance in telecommunications and electricity. In Germany and Europe: How Europeanized is Germany? Proceedings of the British Academy/Oxford University Press, 2003. 2003. p. 251-69