Fit for purpose? Welfare reform and challenges for health and labour market policy in the UK

Colin Lindsay, Donald Houston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the UK, as in some other EU states, the focus of recent welfare reforms has switched from those on unemployment benefits to those receiving sickness/incapacity benefits (IBs), reflecting concerns around the large numbers falling into the this last group. The Labour government elected in 1997 introduced a range of measures to activate those on IBs, setting a target of a one million reduction in the number of claimants by the end of 2015. The Conservative Party similarly came to acknowledge that high levels of IB claiming represented a problem of ‘unemployment hidden as sickness’, and in coalition now proposes even more aggressive supply-side strategies. This paper provides an extensive review of the most recent evidence to identify factors driving the rise in the number of people claiming IBs and, in light of this analysis, assesses whether current policy is fit for purpose. An important conclusion is that any national ‘one-size fits all’ supply-side policy response is blind to the distinctive geography of receipt of IBs and the complex combination of factors that leave some people trapped on these benefits.
LanguageEnglish
Pages703-721
Number of pages19
JournalEnvironment and Planning A
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

welfare reform
labor market
hidden unemployment
receipt of benefits
unemployment benefit
illness
welfare
supply
conservative party
reform
health
unemployment
coalition
labor
EU
geography
evidence
Group
Labor Market Policy
policy

Keywords

  • human resource management
  • welfare reform
  • labour market policy

Cite this

@article{7f77a7e36a3245b49c1e7889669f9098,
title = "Fit for purpose? Welfare reform and challenges for health and labour market policy in the UK",
abstract = "In the UK, as in some other EU states, the focus of recent welfare reforms has switched from those on unemployment benefits to those receiving sickness/incapacity benefits (IBs), reflecting concerns around the large numbers falling into the this last group. The Labour government elected in 1997 introduced a range of measures to activate those on IBs, setting a target of a one million reduction in the number of claimants by the end of 2015. The Conservative Party similarly came to acknowledge that high levels of IB claiming represented a problem of ‘unemployment hidden as sickness’, and in coalition now proposes even more aggressive supply-side strategies. This paper provides an extensive review of the most recent evidence to identify factors driving the rise in the number of people claiming IBs and, in light of this analysis, assesses whether current policy is fit for purpose. An important conclusion is that any national ‘one-size fits all’ supply-side policy response is blind to the distinctive geography of receipt of IBs and the complex combination of factors that leave some people trapped on these benefits.",
keywords = "human resource management, welfare reform, labour market policy",
author = "Colin Lindsay and Donald Houston",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1068/a43442",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "703--721",
journal = "Environment and Planning A",
issn = "0308-518X",
number = "3",

}

Fit for purpose? Welfare reform and challenges for health and labour market policy in the UK. / Lindsay, Colin; Houston, Donald.

In: Environment and Planning A, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2011, p. 703-721.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fit for purpose? Welfare reform and challenges for health and labour market policy in the UK

AU - Lindsay, Colin

AU - Houston, Donald

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - In the UK, as in some other EU states, the focus of recent welfare reforms has switched from those on unemployment benefits to those receiving sickness/incapacity benefits (IBs), reflecting concerns around the large numbers falling into the this last group. The Labour government elected in 1997 introduced a range of measures to activate those on IBs, setting a target of a one million reduction in the number of claimants by the end of 2015. The Conservative Party similarly came to acknowledge that high levels of IB claiming represented a problem of ‘unemployment hidden as sickness’, and in coalition now proposes even more aggressive supply-side strategies. This paper provides an extensive review of the most recent evidence to identify factors driving the rise in the number of people claiming IBs and, in light of this analysis, assesses whether current policy is fit for purpose. An important conclusion is that any national ‘one-size fits all’ supply-side policy response is blind to the distinctive geography of receipt of IBs and the complex combination of factors that leave some people trapped on these benefits.

AB - In the UK, as in some other EU states, the focus of recent welfare reforms has switched from those on unemployment benefits to those receiving sickness/incapacity benefits (IBs), reflecting concerns around the large numbers falling into the this last group. The Labour government elected in 1997 introduced a range of measures to activate those on IBs, setting a target of a one million reduction in the number of claimants by the end of 2015. The Conservative Party similarly came to acknowledge that high levels of IB claiming represented a problem of ‘unemployment hidden as sickness’, and in coalition now proposes even more aggressive supply-side strategies. This paper provides an extensive review of the most recent evidence to identify factors driving the rise in the number of people claiming IBs and, in light of this analysis, assesses whether current policy is fit for purpose. An important conclusion is that any national ‘one-size fits all’ supply-side policy response is blind to the distinctive geography of receipt of IBs and the complex combination of factors that leave some people trapped on these benefits.

KW - human resource management

KW - welfare reform

KW - labour market policy

U2 - 10.1068/a43442

DO - 10.1068/a43442

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 703

EP - 721

JO - Environment and Planning A

T2 - Environment and Planning A

JF - Environment and Planning A

SN - 0308-518X

IS - 3

ER -