Firms and industries in evolutionary economics: Lessons from Marshall, Young, Steindl and Penrose

Harry Bloch, John Finch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evolutionary economists have tended to assess firms and industries separately, neglecting the role of their interaction in the process of economic growth and development. We trace the separation of firms and industries to the introduction of population thinking in the discipline of industrial economics, including some broadly evolutionary analyses. If researchers conflate a population of firms with an industry, they introduce 'thin' means of relating firms to one another and to industries. Despite his device of the 'representative firm', Marshall develops 'thick' means of relating firms to industries by means of their internal and external organizations. Penrose avoids the notion of industry by focussing on heterogeneous and potentially mobile firms. Young and Steindl develop mundane explanations of firms' relations within groups and locate the impetus for economic growth in a poorly understood environment. We conclude that evolutionary economists should revisit firms' boundaries, not in the sense of explaining the existence of firms but in a relating and communicating sense in which boundaries signify the selective means of firms' relationships.
LanguageEnglish
Pages139-162
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Evolutionary Economics
Volume20
Issue number1
Early online date15 Apr 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Evolutionary economics
Penrose
Industry
Evolutionary
Economists
Interaction
Economic growth
Firm boundaries
Industrial economics
Economic growth and development

Keywords

  • firms
  • industries
  • Marshallian economics
  • organization
  • economies
  • firms’ boundaries

Cite this

@article{e0c4f17715374ba19a7f6d6a8b8f48d0,
title = "Firms and industries in evolutionary economics: Lessons from Marshall, Young, Steindl and Penrose",
abstract = "Evolutionary economists have tended to assess firms and industries separately, neglecting the role of their interaction in the process of economic growth and development. We trace the separation of firms and industries to the introduction of population thinking in the discipline of industrial economics, including some broadly evolutionary analyses. If researchers conflate a population of firms with an industry, they introduce 'thin' means of relating firms to one another and to industries. Despite his device of the 'representative firm', Marshall develops 'thick' means of relating firms to industries by means of their internal and external organizations. Penrose avoids the notion of industry by focussing on heterogeneous and potentially mobile firms. Young and Steindl develop mundane explanations of firms' relations within groups and locate the impetus for economic growth in a poorly understood environment. We conclude that evolutionary economists should revisit firms' boundaries, not in the sense of explaining the existence of firms but in a relating and communicating sense in which boundaries signify the selective means of firms' relationships.",
keywords = "firms, industries, Marshallian economics, organization, economies, firms’ boundaries",
author = "Harry Bloch and John Finch",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1007/s00191-009-0133-0",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "139--162",
journal = "Journal of Evolutionary Economics",
issn = "0936-9937",
number = "1",

}

Firms and industries in evolutionary economics: Lessons from Marshall, Young, Steindl and Penrose. / Bloch, Harry; Finch, John.

In: Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 20, No. 1, 15.01.2010, p. 139-162.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Firms and industries in evolutionary economics: Lessons from Marshall, Young, Steindl and Penrose

AU - Bloch, Harry

AU - Finch, John

PY - 2010/1/15

Y1 - 2010/1/15

N2 - Evolutionary economists have tended to assess firms and industries separately, neglecting the role of their interaction in the process of economic growth and development. We trace the separation of firms and industries to the introduction of population thinking in the discipline of industrial economics, including some broadly evolutionary analyses. If researchers conflate a population of firms with an industry, they introduce 'thin' means of relating firms to one another and to industries. Despite his device of the 'representative firm', Marshall develops 'thick' means of relating firms to industries by means of their internal and external organizations. Penrose avoids the notion of industry by focussing on heterogeneous and potentially mobile firms. Young and Steindl develop mundane explanations of firms' relations within groups and locate the impetus for economic growth in a poorly understood environment. We conclude that evolutionary economists should revisit firms' boundaries, not in the sense of explaining the existence of firms but in a relating and communicating sense in which boundaries signify the selective means of firms' relationships.

AB - Evolutionary economists have tended to assess firms and industries separately, neglecting the role of their interaction in the process of economic growth and development. We trace the separation of firms and industries to the introduction of population thinking in the discipline of industrial economics, including some broadly evolutionary analyses. If researchers conflate a population of firms with an industry, they introduce 'thin' means of relating firms to one another and to industries. Despite his device of the 'representative firm', Marshall develops 'thick' means of relating firms to industries by means of their internal and external organizations. Penrose avoids the notion of industry by focussing on heterogeneous and potentially mobile firms. Young and Steindl develop mundane explanations of firms' relations within groups and locate the impetus for economic growth in a poorly understood environment. We conclude that evolutionary economists should revisit firms' boundaries, not in the sense of explaining the existence of firms but in a relating and communicating sense in which boundaries signify the selective means of firms' relationships.

KW - firms

KW - industries

KW - Marshallian economics

KW - organization

KW - economies

KW - firms’ boundaries

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71649096945&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00191-009-0133-0

DO - 10.1007/s00191-009-0133-0

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 139

EP - 162

JO - Journal of Evolutionary Economics

T2 - Journal of Evolutionary Economics

JF - Journal of Evolutionary Economics

SN - 0936-9937

IS - 1

ER -