Finite element modelling and experimental validation of two-roller vertical forward flow forming process of EN36B steel

Acar Can Kocabıçak, Kyle Nelson, Saeed Althamer, Senai Yalçınkaya, Gregor Kosec, Lihua Wang*, Magd Abdel Wahab*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Flow forming is a high-precision metal forming process used to produce thin-walled, rotationally symmetric components with enhanced mechanical properties. This study investigates the two-roller vertical forward flow forming process for EN36B steel through Finite Element Analysis (FEA) using FORGE® NxT 4.0, complemented by experimental validation. Material properties of EN36B steel, including elasticity, thermal, physical, and plasticity characteristics, were modelled with JmatPro software to ensure accurate simulations. Experimental trials included microstructural characterisation, hardness testing, surface roughness evaluation, and twist measurements to validate the numerical model. The FEA simulations provided critical insights into key process parameters such as Von Mises stress, strain, Latham-Cockroft damage, and force dynamics. Defects such as bulging and material build-up were effectively predicted and modelled. Dimensional accuracy was assessed using 3D GOM scanning, revealing a maximum thickness error of 0.3 mm. Discrepancies in force measurements between simulations and experiments were minimal, with deviations of 6.5 % for radial forces and 2.5 % for axial forces. Surface roughness improved significantly, with values decreasing from 2.1 μm Ra to 0.7 μm Ra after vertical forward flow forming. Furthermore, the hardness increased from 186 HV to 260 MPa (around 40 %) after the forming due to the work hardening process with plasticity. Tensile stress of the workpiece increased from 620 MPa to 880 MPa without an additional heat treatment process. Due to the roller's high force on the workpiece's outer surface, the hardness testing revealed a maximum value of 279 HV on the outer surface, reducing to a minimum of 236 HV closer to the inner surface. The hardness error between FEA and experimental results is around 2 %. Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD) analysis indicated higher grain deformation at the outside surface compared to the middle and inner surface of the flow-formed tube. The vertical forward flow forming process reached a maximum temperature of approximately 200 °C, which was efficiently managed through water cooling. The study highlights the utility of Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) formulations and remeshing techniques in simulating complex deformation patterns. These methods provide critical insights for optimising the flow forming process and advancing the manufacture of EN36B steel components.
Original languageEnglish
Article number104063
JournalAdvances in Engineering Software
Volume212
Early online date13 Nov 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 13 Nov 2025

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (project no. 12272270), the Shanghai Pilot Program for Basic Research, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Research and Graduate Studies at King Khalid University for funding this work through Large Group Project under grant number (RGP.2/750/46).

Keywords

  • EN36B
  • Vertical forward flow forming
  • Finite element analysis
  • rbitrary lagrangian-eulerian (ALE)
  • Re-meshing
  • hardness gradient
  • Microstructure
  • 3D GOM Scanning
  • Metal forming

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Finite element modelling and experimental validation of two-roller vertical forward flow forming process of EN36B steel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this