Financial market can go mad: evidence of irrational behaviour during the South Sea Bubble

Richard S. Dale, Johnnie Johnson, Leilei Tang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper explores investor behaviour during the South Sea Bubble - the first major speculative boom and bust on the stock markets. Previous literature debates whether investors during this episode acted rationally. Newly acquired data involving parallel markets for the South Sea Company's stock and subscription receipts are analysed, and widening valuation gaps are observed between these substitutable financial instruments. Rational explanations do not prove adequate, and the anomalies are explained by the biased decision-making of investors, and their tendency to view financial markets as wagering markets. The implications of these findings for the current debate on rationality in financial markets are identified.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)233-271
Number of pages38
JournalEconomic History Review
Volume58
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2005

Fingerprint

Investors
Bubble
Financial markets
Financial Markets
South Sea
Financial instruments
Subscription
Anomaly
Stock market
Rationality
Investor behavior
Decision making
Stock Market
Decision Making
Receipt
Boom
Bust

Keywords

  • financial market
  • irrational behaviour
  • South Sea Bubble
  • investors
  • decision making
  • wagering markets
  • financial instruments

Cite this

@article{5e04a900f39f4df2a1743fdc2e701110,
title = "Financial market can go mad: evidence of irrational behaviour during the South Sea Bubble",
abstract = "This paper explores investor behaviour during the South Sea Bubble - the first major speculative boom and bust on the stock markets. Previous literature debates whether investors during this episode acted rationally. Newly acquired data involving parallel markets for the South Sea Company's stock and subscription receipts are analysed, and widening valuation gaps are observed between these substitutable financial instruments. Rational explanations do not prove adequate, and the anomalies are explained by the biased decision-making of investors, and their tendency to view financial markets as wagering markets. The implications of these findings for the current debate on rationality in financial markets are identified.",
keywords = "financial market, irrational behaviour, South Sea Bubble, investors, decision making, wagering markets, financial instruments",
author = "Dale, {Richard S.} and Johnnie Johnson and Leilei Tang",
year = "2005",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-0289.2005.00304.x",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "233--271",
journal = "Economic History Review",
issn = "0013-0117",
number = "2",

}

Financial market can go mad: evidence of irrational behaviour during the South Sea Bubble. / Dale, Richard S.; Johnson, Johnnie; Tang, Leilei.

In: Economic History Review, Vol. 58, No. 2, 05.2005, p. 233-271.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Financial market can go mad: evidence of irrational behaviour during the South Sea Bubble

AU - Dale, Richard S.

AU - Johnson, Johnnie

AU - Tang, Leilei

PY - 2005/5

Y1 - 2005/5

N2 - This paper explores investor behaviour during the South Sea Bubble - the first major speculative boom and bust on the stock markets. Previous literature debates whether investors during this episode acted rationally. Newly acquired data involving parallel markets for the South Sea Company's stock and subscription receipts are analysed, and widening valuation gaps are observed between these substitutable financial instruments. Rational explanations do not prove adequate, and the anomalies are explained by the biased decision-making of investors, and their tendency to view financial markets as wagering markets. The implications of these findings for the current debate on rationality in financial markets are identified.

AB - This paper explores investor behaviour during the South Sea Bubble - the first major speculative boom and bust on the stock markets. Previous literature debates whether investors during this episode acted rationally. Newly acquired data involving parallel markets for the South Sea Company's stock and subscription receipts are analysed, and widening valuation gaps are observed between these substitutable financial instruments. Rational explanations do not prove adequate, and the anomalies are explained by the biased decision-making of investors, and their tendency to view financial markets as wagering markets. The implications of these findings for the current debate on rationality in financial markets are identified.

KW - financial market

KW - irrational behaviour

KW - South Sea Bubble

KW - investors

KW - decision making

KW - wagering markets

KW - financial instruments

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.2005.00304.x

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-0289.2005.00304.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-0289.2005.00304.x

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 233

EP - 271

JO - Economic History Review

JF - Economic History Review

SN - 0013-0117

IS - 2

ER -