Film lessons: early cinema for historians of science

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Despite much excellent work over the years, the vast history of scientific filmmaking is still largely unknown. Historians of science have long been concerned with visual culture, communication and the public sphere on the one hand, and with expertise, knowledge production and experimental practice on the other. Scientists, we know, drew pictures, took photographs and made three-dimensional models. Rather like models, films could not be printed in journals until the digital era, and this limited their usefulness as evidence. But that did not stop researchers from making movies for projection at conferences as well as in lecture halls, museums and other public venues, not to mention for breaking down into individual frames for analysis. Historians of science are more likely to be found in the library, archive or museum than the darkened screening room, and much work is still needed to demonstrate the major effects of cinema on scientific knowledge. Film may have taken as long to change science as other areas of social life, but one can begin to glimpse important ways in which ‘image machines’ (cameras, projectors and the like) were beginning to mediate between backstage experimental work and more public demonstration even around 1900.
LanguageEnglish
Pages279-286
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Journal for the History of Science
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jun 2016

Fingerprint

Historians of Science
Early Cinema
Backstage
Scientific Knowledge
Movies
Three-dimensional
Public Sphere
Expertise
Venues
Communication
Usefulness
Experimental Practice
Filmmaking
Social Life
Screening
Visual Culture
Knowledge Production
Cinema
History

Keywords

  • science in cinema
  • scientific filmmaking

Cite this

@article{ba7f179ccb894f73ac90760b614ba3e6,
title = "Film lessons: early cinema for historians of science",
abstract = "Despite much excellent work over the years, the vast history of scientific filmmaking is still largely unknown. Historians of science have long been concerned with visual culture, communication and the public sphere on the one hand, and with expertise, knowledge production and experimental practice on the other. Scientists, we know, drew pictures, took photographs and made three-dimensional models. Rather like models, films could not be printed in journals until the digital era, and this limited their usefulness as evidence. But that did not stop researchers from making movies for projection at conferences as well as in lecture halls, museums and other public venues, not to mention for breaking down into individual frames for analysis. Historians of science are more likely to be found in the library, archive or museum than the darkened screening room, and much work is still needed to demonstrate the major effects of cinema on scientific knowledge. Film may have taken as long to change science as other areas of social life, but one can begin to glimpse important ways in which ‘image machines’ (cameras, projectors and the like) were beginning to mediate between backstage experimental work and more public demonstration even around 1900.",
keywords = "science in cinema, scientific filmmaking",
author = "Jesse Olszynko-Gryn",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1017/S000708741600039X",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "279--286",
journal = "British Journal for the History of Science",
issn = "0007-0874",
number = "2",

}

Film lessons : early cinema for historians of science. / Olszynko-Gryn, Jesse.

In: British Journal for the History of Science, Vol. 49, No. 2, 30.06.2016, p. 279-286.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Film lessons

T2 - British Journal for the History of Science

AU - Olszynko-Gryn, Jesse

PY - 2016/6/30

Y1 - 2016/6/30

N2 - Despite much excellent work over the years, the vast history of scientific filmmaking is still largely unknown. Historians of science have long been concerned with visual culture, communication and the public sphere on the one hand, and with expertise, knowledge production and experimental practice on the other. Scientists, we know, drew pictures, took photographs and made three-dimensional models. Rather like models, films could not be printed in journals until the digital era, and this limited their usefulness as evidence. But that did not stop researchers from making movies for projection at conferences as well as in lecture halls, museums and other public venues, not to mention for breaking down into individual frames for analysis. Historians of science are more likely to be found in the library, archive or museum than the darkened screening room, and much work is still needed to demonstrate the major effects of cinema on scientific knowledge. Film may have taken as long to change science as other areas of social life, but one can begin to glimpse important ways in which ‘image machines’ (cameras, projectors and the like) were beginning to mediate between backstage experimental work and more public demonstration even around 1900.

AB - Despite much excellent work over the years, the vast history of scientific filmmaking is still largely unknown. Historians of science have long been concerned with visual culture, communication and the public sphere on the one hand, and with expertise, knowledge production and experimental practice on the other. Scientists, we know, drew pictures, took photographs and made three-dimensional models. Rather like models, films could not be printed in journals until the digital era, and this limited their usefulness as evidence. But that did not stop researchers from making movies for projection at conferences as well as in lecture halls, museums and other public venues, not to mention for breaking down into individual frames for analysis. Historians of science are more likely to be found in the library, archive or museum than the darkened screening room, and much work is still needed to demonstrate the major effects of cinema on scientific knowledge. Film may have taken as long to change science as other areas of social life, but one can begin to glimpse important ways in which ‘image machines’ (cameras, projectors and the like) were beginning to mediate between backstage experimental work and more public demonstration even around 1900.

KW - science in cinema

KW - scientific filmmaking

U2 - 10.1017/S000708741600039X

DO - 10.1017/S000708741600039X

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 279

EP - 286

JO - British Journal for the History of Science

JF - British Journal for the History of Science

SN - 0007-0874

IS - 2

ER -