Filling in the missing pieces: a comparative Rasch analysis of inpatient and outpatient SCL90R data

Robert Elliott, Christine Fox, Svetlana A. Beltyukova, Andrew Moskowitz

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

In our Rasch analysis of the Symptom Checklist-90-R (SCL90R) using an American outpatient sample (n=298), Elliott et al. (2006) noted among other things that there was a sampling gap in the upper extreme range of the measured underlying client distress dimension. In this paper we remedy this gap by replicating our earlier results with a Scottish inpatient sample (n= 135). When analyzed separately, a three-point rating scale again appeared to provide a better trade-off between reliability and simplicity than the standard 5-point scale. The inpatient sample showed comparable person separation to the outpatient sample (5.13 vs. 5.31), but as expected because of greater participant homogeneity, item separation was substantially lower (4.76 vs. 8.89), indicating less discrimination among items, but equivalent discrimination among persons. Interestingly, when we collapsed the rating scale into only two points ('not at all' vs. all other ratings), there was very little loss of information. Ironically, this suggests that the SCL90R could be used as a 'checklist' after all, in which symptoms are rated either present or absent.

Conference

ConferenceSPR (UK) Ravenscar research Conference 2009
CityRavenscar
Period14/03/0916/03/09

Fingerprint

rating scale
discrimination
human being
remedies
rating
present
homogeneity

Keywords

  • Rasch analysis
  • inpatients
  • outpatients
  • counselling

Cite this

Elliott, R., Fox, C., Beltyukova, S. A., & Moskowitz, A. (2009). Filling in the missing pieces: a comparative Rasch analysis of inpatient and outpatient SCL90R data. Paper presented at SPR (UK) Ravenscar research Conference 2009, Ravenscar, .
Elliott, Robert ; Fox, Christine ; Beltyukova, Svetlana A. ; Moskowitz, Andrew. / Filling in the missing pieces: a comparative Rasch analysis of inpatient and outpatient SCL90R data. Paper presented at SPR (UK) Ravenscar research Conference 2009, Ravenscar, .
@conference{a399adfba04a46679a1080446ffe4d6c,
title = "Filling in the missing pieces: a comparative Rasch analysis of inpatient and outpatient SCL90R data",
abstract = "In our Rasch analysis of the Symptom Checklist-90-R (SCL90R) using an American outpatient sample (n=298), Elliott et al. (2006) noted among other things that there was a sampling gap in the upper extreme range of the measured underlying client distress dimension. In this paper we remedy this gap by replicating our earlier results with a Scottish inpatient sample (n= 135). When analyzed separately, a three-point rating scale again appeared to provide a better trade-off between reliability and simplicity than the standard 5-point scale. The inpatient sample showed comparable person separation to the outpatient sample (5.13 vs. 5.31), but as expected because of greater participant homogeneity, item separation was substantially lower (4.76 vs. 8.89), indicating less discrimination among items, but equivalent discrimination among persons. Interestingly, when we collapsed the rating scale into only two points ('not at all' vs. all other ratings), there was very little loss of information. Ironically, this suggests that the SCL90R could be used as a 'checklist' after all, in which symptoms are rated either present or absent.",
keywords = "Rasch analysis, inpatients, outpatients, counselling",
author = "Robert Elliott and Christine Fox and Beltyukova, {Svetlana A.} and Andrew Moskowitz",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
language = "English",
note = "SPR (UK) Ravenscar research Conference 2009 ; Conference date: 14-03-2009 Through 16-03-2009",

}

Elliott, R, Fox, C, Beltyukova, SA & Moskowitz, A 2009, 'Filling in the missing pieces: a comparative Rasch analysis of inpatient and outpatient SCL90R data' Paper presented at SPR (UK) Ravenscar research Conference 2009, Ravenscar, 14/03/09 - 16/03/09, .

Filling in the missing pieces: a comparative Rasch analysis of inpatient and outpatient SCL90R data. / Elliott, Robert; Fox, Christine; Beltyukova, Svetlana A.; Moskowitz, Andrew.

2009. Paper presented at SPR (UK) Ravenscar research Conference 2009, Ravenscar, .

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - Filling in the missing pieces: a comparative Rasch analysis of inpatient and outpatient SCL90R data

AU - Elliott, Robert

AU - Fox, Christine

AU - Beltyukova, Svetlana A.

AU - Moskowitz, Andrew

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - In our Rasch analysis of the Symptom Checklist-90-R (SCL90R) using an American outpatient sample (n=298), Elliott et al. (2006) noted among other things that there was a sampling gap in the upper extreme range of the measured underlying client distress dimension. In this paper we remedy this gap by replicating our earlier results with a Scottish inpatient sample (n= 135). When analyzed separately, a three-point rating scale again appeared to provide a better trade-off between reliability and simplicity than the standard 5-point scale. The inpatient sample showed comparable person separation to the outpatient sample (5.13 vs. 5.31), but as expected because of greater participant homogeneity, item separation was substantially lower (4.76 vs. 8.89), indicating less discrimination among items, but equivalent discrimination among persons. Interestingly, when we collapsed the rating scale into only two points ('not at all' vs. all other ratings), there was very little loss of information. Ironically, this suggests that the SCL90R could be used as a 'checklist' after all, in which symptoms are rated either present or absent.

AB - In our Rasch analysis of the Symptom Checklist-90-R (SCL90R) using an American outpatient sample (n=298), Elliott et al. (2006) noted among other things that there was a sampling gap in the upper extreme range of the measured underlying client distress dimension. In this paper we remedy this gap by replicating our earlier results with a Scottish inpatient sample (n= 135). When analyzed separately, a three-point rating scale again appeared to provide a better trade-off between reliability and simplicity than the standard 5-point scale. The inpatient sample showed comparable person separation to the outpatient sample (5.13 vs. 5.31), but as expected because of greater participant homogeneity, item separation was substantially lower (4.76 vs. 8.89), indicating less discrimination among items, but equivalent discrimination among persons. Interestingly, when we collapsed the rating scale into only two points ('not at all' vs. all other ratings), there was very little loss of information. Ironically, this suggests that the SCL90R could be used as a 'checklist' after all, in which symptoms are rated either present or absent.

KW - Rasch analysis

KW - inpatients

KW - outpatients

KW - counselling

UR - http://www.psychotherapyresearch.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=242

M3 - Paper

ER -

Elliott R, Fox C, Beltyukova SA, Moskowitz A. Filling in the missing pieces: a comparative Rasch analysis of inpatient and outpatient SCL90R data. 2009. Paper presented at SPR (UK) Ravenscar research Conference 2009, Ravenscar, .