Fifty years of representative and responsible government: contemporary relevance, theoretical revisions and conceptual reflection

Matthew Flinders, David Judge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article uses A. H. Birch’s Representative and Responsible Government (1964) as an analytical lens through which to understand not just the evolution of representative democracy in the intervening fifty years but also to trace and reflect upon the evolution (and future) of the study of representative democracy. This is demonstrated by highlighting how ideational and empirical challenges have resulted in claims that representative and responsible government has now been displaced by representative versus responsible government, or to more extreme interpretations that suggest contemporary electoral processes and institutions now provide for neither representative nor responsible government. This reveals how political analysis has built-upon and evolved away from Birch’s initial focus in significant ways while possibly suggesting that a neo-Birch’ian might profitably refocus on the linkage or nexus between modes of representation and manifestations of responsible government. Recognising the importance of this nexus in the context of ‘declinist’ narratives concerning the ‘death’, ‘suicide’ or ‘end’ of democracy remains the lasting legacy bequeathed by Birch.
LanguageEnglish
Pages97-116
Number of pages20
JournalRepresentation
Volume53
Issue number2
Early online date29 Jun 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Oct 2017

Fingerprint

representative democracy
suicide
democracy
death
narrative
interpretation

Keywords

  • democracy
  • representation
  • UK politics
  • governance
  • responsibility

Cite this

@article{031537bb21ae419796fa61388e92dfe5,
title = "Fifty years of representative and responsible government: contemporary relevance, theoretical revisions and conceptual reflection",
abstract = "This article uses A. H. Birch’s Representative and Responsible Government (1964) as an analytical lens through which to understand not just the evolution of representative democracy in the intervening fifty years but also to trace and reflect upon the evolution (and future) of the study of representative democracy. This is demonstrated by highlighting how ideational and empirical challenges have resulted in claims that representative and responsible government has now been displaced by representative versus responsible government, or to more extreme interpretations that suggest contemporary electoral processes and institutions now provide for neither representative nor responsible government. This reveals how political analysis has built-upon and evolved away from Birch’s initial focus in significant ways while possibly suggesting that a neo-Birch’ian might profitably refocus on the linkage or nexus between modes of representation and manifestations of responsible government. Recognising the importance of this nexus in the context of ‘declinist’ narratives concerning the ‘death’, ‘suicide’ or ‘end’ of democracy remains the lasting legacy bequeathed by Birch.",
keywords = "democracy, representation, UK politics, governance, responsibility",
author = "Matthew Flinders and David Judge",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1080/00344893.2017.1341078",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "97--116",
journal = "Representation",
issn = "0034-4893",
number = "2",

}

Fifty years of representative and responsible government : contemporary relevance, theoretical revisions and conceptual reflection. / Flinders, Matthew; Judge, David.

In: Representation, Vol. 53, No. 2, 26.10.2017, p. 97-116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fifty years of representative and responsible government

T2 - Representation

AU - Flinders, Matthew

AU - Judge, David

PY - 2017/10/26

Y1 - 2017/10/26

N2 - This article uses A. H. Birch’s Representative and Responsible Government (1964) as an analytical lens through which to understand not just the evolution of representative democracy in the intervening fifty years but also to trace and reflect upon the evolution (and future) of the study of representative democracy. This is demonstrated by highlighting how ideational and empirical challenges have resulted in claims that representative and responsible government has now been displaced by representative versus responsible government, or to more extreme interpretations that suggest contemporary electoral processes and institutions now provide for neither representative nor responsible government. This reveals how political analysis has built-upon and evolved away from Birch’s initial focus in significant ways while possibly suggesting that a neo-Birch’ian might profitably refocus on the linkage or nexus between modes of representation and manifestations of responsible government. Recognising the importance of this nexus in the context of ‘declinist’ narratives concerning the ‘death’, ‘suicide’ or ‘end’ of democracy remains the lasting legacy bequeathed by Birch.

AB - This article uses A. H. Birch’s Representative and Responsible Government (1964) as an analytical lens through which to understand not just the evolution of representative democracy in the intervening fifty years but also to trace and reflect upon the evolution (and future) of the study of representative democracy. This is demonstrated by highlighting how ideational and empirical challenges have resulted in claims that representative and responsible government has now been displaced by representative versus responsible government, or to more extreme interpretations that suggest contemporary electoral processes and institutions now provide for neither representative nor responsible government. This reveals how political analysis has built-upon and evolved away from Birch’s initial focus in significant ways while possibly suggesting that a neo-Birch’ian might profitably refocus on the linkage or nexus between modes of representation and manifestations of responsible government. Recognising the importance of this nexus in the context of ‘declinist’ narratives concerning the ‘death’, ‘suicide’ or ‘end’ of democracy remains the lasting legacy bequeathed by Birch.

KW - democracy

KW - representation

KW - UK politics

KW - governance

KW - responsibility

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rrep20/current

U2 - 10.1080/00344893.2017.1341078

DO - 10.1080/00344893.2017.1341078

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 97

EP - 116

JO - Representation

JF - Representation

SN - 0034-4893

IS - 2

ER -