Feminist scholarship, bridge-building and political affinity

C. Eschle, Bice Maiguashca

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this short essay we consider, first, the reasons why feminist IR academics should seek to build bridges with each other, with other academics and with those outside the university. Second, we develop some tentative guidelines for how we should go about the task of bridge-building, drawing on our research into feminist activism at the World Social Forum. Our intention in so doing is not to reinforce what we have elsewhere criticised as a false dichotomy between activists and academics, but rather to locate feminist IR scholars within a wider feminist community and their work within a shared political project. This paper could thus be seen as a form of bridge building in and of itself. Along the way, we hope to draw out some of the problems of and boundaries to coalition politics for feminist IR academics, thus contributing to a dialogue on the possible 'limits' of bridge-building from a feminist perspective.
LanguageEnglish
Pages127-134
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Relations
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2009

Fingerprint

coalition
dialogue
politics
university
community

Keywords

  • feminist academics
  • bridge-building
  • activism

Cite this

Eschle, C. ; Maiguashca, Bice. / Feminist scholarship, bridge-building and political affinity. In: International Relations. 2009 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 127-134.
@article{e7e22efcae734238bb6a8d32139292b0,
title = "Feminist scholarship, bridge-building and political affinity",
abstract = "In this short essay we consider, first, the reasons why feminist IR academics should seek to build bridges with each other, with other academics and with those outside the university. Second, we develop some tentative guidelines for how we should go about the task of bridge-building, drawing on our research into feminist activism at the World Social Forum. Our intention in so doing is not to reinforce what we have elsewhere criticised as a false dichotomy between activists and academics, but rather to locate feminist IR scholars within a wider feminist community and their work within a shared political project. This paper could thus be seen as a form of bridge building in and of itself. Along the way, we hope to draw out some of the problems of and boundaries to coalition politics for feminist IR academics, thus contributing to a dialogue on the possible 'limits' of bridge-building from a feminist perspective.",
keywords = "feminist academics, bridge-building, activism",
author = "C. Eschle and Bice Maiguashca",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1177/0047117808100618",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "127--134",
journal = "International Relations",
issn = "0047-1178",
number = "1",

}

Feminist scholarship, bridge-building and political affinity. / Eschle, C.; Maiguashca, Bice.

In: International Relations, Vol. 23, No. 1, 03.2009, p. 127-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feminist scholarship, bridge-building and political affinity

AU - Eschle, C.

AU - Maiguashca, Bice

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - In this short essay we consider, first, the reasons why feminist IR academics should seek to build bridges with each other, with other academics and with those outside the university. Second, we develop some tentative guidelines for how we should go about the task of bridge-building, drawing on our research into feminist activism at the World Social Forum. Our intention in so doing is not to reinforce what we have elsewhere criticised as a false dichotomy between activists and academics, but rather to locate feminist IR scholars within a wider feminist community and their work within a shared political project. This paper could thus be seen as a form of bridge building in and of itself. Along the way, we hope to draw out some of the problems of and boundaries to coalition politics for feminist IR academics, thus contributing to a dialogue on the possible 'limits' of bridge-building from a feminist perspective.

AB - In this short essay we consider, first, the reasons why feminist IR academics should seek to build bridges with each other, with other academics and with those outside the university. Second, we develop some tentative guidelines for how we should go about the task of bridge-building, drawing on our research into feminist activism at the World Social Forum. Our intention in so doing is not to reinforce what we have elsewhere criticised as a false dichotomy between activists and academics, but rather to locate feminist IR scholars within a wider feminist community and their work within a shared political project. This paper could thus be seen as a form of bridge building in and of itself. Along the way, we hope to draw out some of the problems of and boundaries to coalition politics for feminist IR academics, thus contributing to a dialogue on the possible 'limits' of bridge-building from a feminist perspective.

KW - feminist academics

KW - bridge-building

KW - activism

UR - http://ire.sagepub.com/

U2 - 10.1177/0047117808100618

DO - 10.1177/0047117808100618

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 127

EP - 134

JO - International Relations

T2 - International Relations

JF - International Relations

SN - 0047-1178

IS - 1

ER -