Feminist collaborations in higher education: stretched across career stages

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Categorical career stages offer an institutional framework through which mobilities can be claimed and contested by feminists in academia. Inhabiting career stages uncritically can serve to reproduce neoliberal academic structures that feminists may seek to resist. Collaboration across career stages is a significant empirical case for understanding how feminists occupy academic space. We use auto-ethnographic methods to read career stages and feminist collaboration through each other, analysing the authors’ cross-career collaborations and mentoring relationship in a Scottish University. We ask how feminist collaboration can claim and disrupt the neoliberal temporal logics of competitively achieving individuals on upward career trajectories, where academic arrival can feel permanently deferred. As such we argue for more pluralised and fragmented understandings of ‘career stages’, which as fixed categories work to position academics as either precarious or privileged, and for a messier imaginary of academic work and careers.
LanguageEnglish
JournalGender and Education
Early online date10 May 2018
DOIs
StateE-pub ahead of print - 10 May 2018

Fingerprint

career
education
logic
mentoring

Keywords

  • feminism
  • academia
  • autoethnography
  • career development
  • higher education

Cite this

@article{08f41ad049c0415cbaf6e2784201e4a4,
title = "Feminist collaborations in higher education: stretched across career stages",
abstract = "Categorical career stages offer an institutional framework through which mobilities can be claimed and contested by feminists in academia. Inhabiting career stages uncritically can serve to reproduce neoliberal academic structures that feminists may seek to resist. Collaboration across career stages is a significant empirical case for understanding how feminists occupy academic space. We use auto-ethnographic methods to read career stages and feminist collaboration through each other, analysing the authors’ cross-career collaborations and mentoring relationship in a Scottish University. We ask how feminist collaboration can claim and disrupt the neoliberal temporal logics of competitively achieving individuals on upward career trajectories, where academic arrival can feel permanently deferred. As such we argue for more pluralised and fragmented understandings of ‘career stages’, which as fixed categories work to position academics as either precarious or privileged, and for a messier imaginary of academic work and careers.",
keywords = "feminism, academia, autoethnography, career development, higher education",
author = "Maddie Breeze and Yvette Taylor",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Gender and Education on 10/05/2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09540253.2018.1471197",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1080/09540253.2018.1471197",
language = "English",
journal = "Gender and Education",
issn = "0954-0253",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feminist collaborations in higher education

T2 - Gender and Education

AU - Breeze,Maddie

AU - Taylor,Yvette

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Gender and Education on 10/05/2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09540253.2018.1471197

PY - 2018/5/10

Y1 - 2018/5/10

N2 - Categorical career stages offer an institutional framework through which mobilities can be claimed and contested by feminists in academia. Inhabiting career stages uncritically can serve to reproduce neoliberal academic structures that feminists may seek to resist. Collaboration across career stages is a significant empirical case for understanding how feminists occupy academic space. We use auto-ethnographic methods to read career stages and feminist collaboration through each other, analysing the authors’ cross-career collaborations and mentoring relationship in a Scottish University. We ask how feminist collaboration can claim and disrupt the neoliberal temporal logics of competitively achieving individuals on upward career trajectories, where academic arrival can feel permanently deferred. As such we argue for more pluralised and fragmented understandings of ‘career stages’, which as fixed categories work to position academics as either precarious or privileged, and for a messier imaginary of academic work and careers.

AB - Categorical career stages offer an institutional framework through which mobilities can be claimed and contested by feminists in academia. Inhabiting career stages uncritically can serve to reproduce neoliberal academic structures that feminists may seek to resist. Collaboration across career stages is a significant empirical case for understanding how feminists occupy academic space. We use auto-ethnographic methods to read career stages and feminist collaboration through each other, analysing the authors’ cross-career collaborations and mentoring relationship in a Scottish University. We ask how feminist collaboration can claim and disrupt the neoliberal temporal logics of competitively achieving individuals on upward career trajectories, where academic arrival can feel permanently deferred. As such we argue for more pluralised and fragmented understandings of ‘career stages’, which as fixed categories work to position academics as either precarious or privileged, and for a messier imaginary of academic work and careers.

KW - feminism

KW - academia

KW - autoethnography

KW - career development

KW - higher education

U2 - 10.1080/09540253.2018.1471197

DO - 10.1080/09540253.2018.1471197

M3 - Article

JO - Gender and Education

JF - Gender and Education

SN - 0954-0253

ER -