Female captivity and the rhetoric of supplication: the cases of Lady Mary Grey and Lady Arabella Stuart

Alison Thorne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article examines the epistolary production of two high-ranking women, Lady
Mary Grey and Lady Arbella Stuart, who experienced various forms of captivity. It argues that they inhabited a carceral milieu where both men and women were exposed to the possibility of periodic imprisonment. Both Grey and Stuart were obsessed with the notion of liberty and its obverse, the ever present threat of captivity or execution that overshadowed their lives. Male and female prisoners sought to improve their lot by securing an intercessor to plead on their behalf, thereby manipulating the patronage system to their advantage. Pressures on these women drove them to retreat into a fantasy world. Attention is also paid to the rhetorical strategies used in their letter-writing, including an appeal to ethos (good character) and pathos (emotions) that were privileged at the expense of logos (reason). The article focuses on comparative analysis of the different rhetorical styles deployed by Grey and Stuart, and charts how Stuart’s linguistic usage varied according to changes in her personal circumstances.
LanguageEnglish
Pages152-171
Number of pages20
JournalLives and Letters
Volume4
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Rhetoric
Supplication
Fantasy World
Threat
Imprisonment
Comparative Analysis
Liberty
Milieu
Patronage
Prisoners
Pathos
Charts
Rhetorical Strategies
Ethos
Logos
Ranking
Emotion
Letter Writing
Retreat

Keywords

  • captivity
  • liberty
  • patronage system
  • rhetorical strategies
  • pleading

Cite this

@article{175aa802567f47e7ab68d5950997dd86,
title = "Female captivity and the rhetoric of supplication: the cases of Lady Mary Grey and Lady Arabella Stuart",
abstract = "This article examines the epistolary production of two high-ranking women, LadyMary Grey and Lady Arbella Stuart, who experienced various forms of captivity. It argues that they inhabited a carceral milieu where both men and women were exposed to the possibility of periodic imprisonment. Both Grey and Stuart were obsessed with the notion of liberty and its obverse, the ever present threat of captivity or execution that overshadowed their lives. Male and female prisoners sought to improve their lot by securing an intercessor to plead on their behalf, thereby manipulating the patronage system to their advantage. Pressures on these women drove them to retreat into a fantasy world. Attention is also paid to the rhetorical strategies used in their letter-writing, including an appeal to ethos (good character) and pathos (emotions) that were privileged at the expense of logos (reason). The article focuses on comparative analysis of the different rhetorical styles deployed by Grey and Stuart, and charts how Stuart’s linguistic usage varied according to changes in her personal circumstances.",
keywords = "captivity, liberty, patronage system, rhetorical strategies, pleading",
author = "Alison Thorne",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "152--171",
journal = "Lives and Letters",
issn = "2040-4395",
number = "1",

}

Female captivity and the rhetoric of supplication : the cases of Lady Mary Grey and Lady Arabella Stuart. / Thorne, Alison.

In: Lives and Letters, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2012, p. 152-171.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Female captivity and the rhetoric of supplication

T2 - Lives and Letters

AU - Thorne, Alison

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - This article examines the epistolary production of two high-ranking women, LadyMary Grey and Lady Arbella Stuart, who experienced various forms of captivity. It argues that they inhabited a carceral milieu where both men and women were exposed to the possibility of periodic imprisonment. Both Grey and Stuart were obsessed with the notion of liberty and its obverse, the ever present threat of captivity or execution that overshadowed their lives. Male and female prisoners sought to improve their lot by securing an intercessor to plead on their behalf, thereby manipulating the patronage system to their advantage. Pressures on these women drove them to retreat into a fantasy world. Attention is also paid to the rhetorical strategies used in their letter-writing, including an appeal to ethos (good character) and pathos (emotions) that were privileged at the expense of logos (reason). The article focuses on comparative analysis of the different rhetorical styles deployed by Grey and Stuart, and charts how Stuart’s linguistic usage varied according to changes in her personal circumstances.

AB - This article examines the epistolary production of two high-ranking women, LadyMary Grey and Lady Arbella Stuart, who experienced various forms of captivity. It argues that they inhabited a carceral milieu where both men and women were exposed to the possibility of periodic imprisonment. Both Grey and Stuart were obsessed with the notion of liberty and its obverse, the ever present threat of captivity or execution that overshadowed their lives. Male and female prisoners sought to improve their lot by securing an intercessor to plead on their behalf, thereby manipulating the patronage system to their advantage. Pressures on these women drove them to retreat into a fantasy world. Attention is also paid to the rhetorical strategies used in their letter-writing, including an appeal to ethos (good character) and pathos (emotions) that were privileged at the expense of logos (reason). The article focuses on comparative analysis of the different rhetorical styles deployed by Grey and Stuart, and charts how Stuart’s linguistic usage varied according to changes in her personal circumstances.

KW - captivity

KW - liberty

KW - patronage system

KW - rhetorical strategies

KW - pleading

UR - http://journal.xmera.org/volume-4-no-1-autumn-2012

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 152

EP - 171

JO - Lives and Letters

JF - Lives and Letters

SN - 2040-4395

IS - 1

ER -