Feasibility of different corrective control options for the improvement of transient stability

Juan D. Morales; Panagiotis N. Papadopoulos; Jovica V. Milanović

doi:10.1109/PTC.2017.7981015

Feasibility of different corrective control options for the improvement of transient stability

Juan D. Morales, Panagiotis N. Papadopoulos, Jovica V. Milanović

Electronic And Electrical Engineering

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution book

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Corrective control actions for Transient Stability Improvement (TSI) could offer a solution to possible problems arising in modern stressed power networks operating under higher level of uncertainty. A comparative analysis of the most widely used corrective TSI methods is presented in this paper. The impact of the different Corrective Measures (CMs) on transient stability is investigated for different size of equipment, by calculating the additional time that the system is capable of withstanding severe disturbances at different locations. A comparison between different CMs is also performed, to identify the conditions under which each measure is most effective and therefore guide the design of stabilization strategies for large power systems. The work in this paper contributes specifically to the decentralized real-time stabilization of power systems.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	PowerTech, 2017 IEEE Manchester
Place of Publication	Piscataway, NJ
Publisher	IEEE
Number of pages	6
ISBN (Print)	9781509042371
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/PTC.2017.7981015
Publication status	Published - 20 Jul 2017
Event	2017 IEEE Manchester PowerTech, Powertech 2017 - Manchester, United Kingdom Duration: 18 Jun 2017 → 22 Jun 2017

Conference

Conference	2017 IEEE Manchester PowerTech, Powertech 2017
Country/Territory	United Kingdom
City	Manchester
Period	18/06/17 → 22/06/17

Keywords

corrective control
decentralized real time stabilization
transient stability assessment
transient stability improvement

Access to Document

10.1109/PTC.2017.7981015

Cite this

@inproceedings{4238dd8861d24ff0a920d7d42cc715c0,

title = "Feasibility of different corrective control options for the improvement of transient stability",

abstract = "Corrective control actions for Transient Stability Improvement (TSI) could offer a solution to possible problems arising in modern stressed power networks operating under higher level of uncertainty. A comparative analysis of the most widely used corrective TSI methods is presented in this paper. The impact of the different Corrective Measures (CMs) on transient stability is investigated for different size of equipment, by calculating the additional time that the system is capable of withstanding severe disturbances at different locations. A comparison between different CMs is also performed, to identify the conditions under which each measure is most effective and therefore guide the design of stabilization strategies for large power systems. The work in this paper contributes specifically to the decentralized real-time stabilization of power systems.",

keywords = "corrective control, decentralized real time stabilization, transient stability assessment, transient stability improvement",

author = "Morales, {Juan D.} and Papadopoulos, {Panagiotis N.} and Milanovi{\'c}, {Jovica V.}",

year = "2017",

month = jul,

day = "20",

doi = "10.1109/PTC.2017.7981015",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781509042371",

booktitle = "PowerTech, 2017 IEEE Manchester",

publisher = "IEEE",

note = "2017 IEEE Manchester PowerTech, Powertech 2017 ; Conference date: 18-06-2017 Through 22-06-2017",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Feasibility of different corrective control options for the improvement of transient stability

AU - Morales, Juan D.

AU - Papadopoulos, Panagiotis N.

AU - Milanović, Jovica V.

PY - 2017/7/20

Y1 - 2017/7/20

N2 - Corrective control actions for Transient Stability Improvement (TSI) could offer a solution to possible problems arising in modern stressed power networks operating under higher level of uncertainty. A comparative analysis of the most widely used corrective TSI methods is presented in this paper. The impact of the different Corrective Measures (CMs) on transient stability is investigated for different size of equipment, by calculating the additional time that the system is capable of withstanding severe disturbances at different locations. A comparison between different CMs is also performed, to identify the conditions under which each measure is most effective and therefore guide the design of stabilization strategies for large power systems. The work in this paper contributes specifically to the decentralized real-time stabilization of power systems.

AB - Corrective control actions for Transient Stability Improvement (TSI) could offer a solution to possible problems arising in modern stressed power networks operating under higher level of uncertainty. A comparative analysis of the most widely used corrective TSI methods is presented in this paper. The impact of the different Corrective Measures (CMs) on transient stability is investigated for different size of equipment, by calculating the additional time that the system is capable of withstanding severe disturbances at different locations. A comparison between different CMs is also performed, to identify the conditions under which each measure is most effective and therefore guide the design of stabilization strategies for large power systems. The work in this paper contributes specifically to the decentralized real-time stabilization of power systems.

KW - corrective control

KW - decentralized real time stabilization

KW - transient stability assessment

KW - transient stability improvement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034783910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/PTC.2017.7981015

DO - 10.1109/PTC.2017.7981015

M3 - Conference contribution book

AN - SCOPUS:85034783910

SN - 9781509042371

BT - PowerTech, 2017 IEEE Manchester

PB - IEEE

CY - Piscataway, NJ

T2 - 2017 IEEE Manchester PowerTech, Powertech 2017

Y2 - 18 June 2017 through 22 June 2017

ER -

Feasibility of different corrective control options for the improvement of transient stability

Abstract

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this