Fantasy island: a labour process critique of the 'age of surveillance'

P. Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While surveillance has long been recognised as part of the armoury of managerial practices in the workplace, there has been increasing claims that electronic or panoptic surveillance is a new and successful model of control. This paper explores and challenges these claims by examining in detail 'hard' and 'soft' versions of the story through the work of Sewell and Zuboff respectively, before looking briefly at recent debates on call centres. It concludes by arguing that through there has been some shift towards surveillance practices, there is insufficient evidence that a combination of electronic panopticon and peer pressure is effective and distinctive enough to constitute a credible new model of control of the labour process. In addition, social scientists must be careful not to assume that developments in workplace surveillance are transferable to the broader social terrain, or vice versa.
LanguageEnglish
Pages138-151
Number of pages13
JournalSurveillance and Society
Volume1
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Fingerprint

surveillance
labor
Personnel
workplace
call center
electronics
social scientist
evidence

Keywords

  • workplace surveillance
  • work
  • employment
  • call centres

Cite this

@article{86fb42747034433080f6b6072f44ecab,
title = "Fantasy island: a labour process critique of the 'age of surveillance'",
abstract = "While surveillance has long been recognised as part of the armoury of managerial practices in the workplace, there has been increasing claims that electronic or panoptic surveillance is a new and successful model of control. This paper explores and challenges these claims by examining in detail 'hard' and 'soft' versions of the story through the work of Sewell and Zuboff respectively, before looking briefly at recent debates on call centres. It concludes by arguing that through there has been some shift towards surveillance practices, there is insufficient evidence that a combination of electronic panopticon and peer pressure is effective and distinctive enough to constitute a credible new model of control of the labour process. In addition, social scientists must be careful not to assume that developments in workplace surveillance are transferable to the broader social terrain, or vice versa.",
keywords = "workplace surveillance, work, employment, call centres",
author = "P. Thompson",
year = "2003",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "138--151",
journal = "Surveillance and Society",
issn = "1477-7487",
publisher = "Surveillance Studies Network",
number = "2",

}

Fantasy island: a labour process critique of the 'age of surveillance'. / Thompson, P.

In: Surveillance and Society, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2003, p. 138-151.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fantasy island: a labour process critique of the 'age of surveillance'

AU - Thompson, P.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - While surveillance has long been recognised as part of the armoury of managerial practices in the workplace, there has been increasing claims that electronic or panoptic surveillance is a new and successful model of control. This paper explores and challenges these claims by examining in detail 'hard' and 'soft' versions of the story through the work of Sewell and Zuboff respectively, before looking briefly at recent debates on call centres. It concludes by arguing that through there has been some shift towards surveillance practices, there is insufficient evidence that a combination of electronic panopticon and peer pressure is effective and distinctive enough to constitute a credible new model of control of the labour process. In addition, social scientists must be careful not to assume that developments in workplace surveillance are transferable to the broader social terrain, or vice versa.

AB - While surveillance has long been recognised as part of the armoury of managerial practices in the workplace, there has been increasing claims that electronic or panoptic surveillance is a new and successful model of control. This paper explores and challenges these claims by examining in detail 'hard' and 'soft' versions of the story through the work of Sewell and Zuboff respectively, before looking briefly at recent debates on call centres. It concludes by arguing that through there has been some shift towards surveillance practices, there is insufficient evidence that a combination of electronic panopticon and peer pressure is effective and distinctive enough to constitute a credible new model of control of the labour process. In addition, social scientists must be careful not to assume that developments in workplace surveillance are transferable to the broader social terrain, or vice versa.

KW - workplace surveillance

KW - work

KW - employment

KW - call centres

UR - http://www.surveillance-and-society.org/articles1(2)/fantasyisland.pdf

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 138

EP - 151

JO - Surveillance and Society

T2 - Surveillance and Society

JF - Surveillance and Society

SN - 1477-7487

IS - 2

ER -