Fair and equitable benefit-sharing at the cross-roads of the human right to science and international biodiversity law

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

As the debate about the need to clarify the content of the human right to science intensifies, this article assesses opportunities for opening a scholarly and policy dialogue on fair and equitable benefit-sharing between international human rights and biodiversity lawyers. To that end, the article contrasts the emerging conceptualizations of the right to science in the context of international cultural rights and of fair and equitable benefit-sharing under international biodiversity law. It then critically assesses the potential for cross-fertilization with specific regard to: the sharing of scientific information and promotion of scientific cooperation, the transfer of technology, and the protection and valorization of traditional knowledge of indigenous peoples and local communities. While acknowledging that both the right to science and fair and equitable benefit-sharing are far from being fully understood or operationalized, the article argues that developments in international biodiversity law concerning the latter may provide insights into how a vague and optimistic concept can (and when it cannot) lead to tangible outcomes, rather than remaining merely rhetorical.
LanguageEnglish
Pages803-831
Number of pages29
JournalLaws
Volume4
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Dec 2015

Fingerprint

human rights
biodiversity
Law
science
traditional knowledge
scientific cooperation
lawyer
promotion
dialogue
community

Keywords

  • right to science
  • benefit-sharing
  • equity
  • international law
  • biodiversity
  • human rights
  • environmental law

Cite this

@article{5d69b34ab60f494cb5b2932debcd8395,
title = "Fair and equitable benefit-sharing at the cross-roads of the human right to science and international biodiversity law",
abstract = "As the debate about the need to clarify the content of the human right to science intensifies, this article assesses opportunities for opening a scholarly and policy dialogue on fair and equitable benefit-sharing between international human rights and biodiversity lawyers. To that end, the article contrasts the emerging conceptualizations of the right to science in the context of international cultural rights and of fair and equitable benefit-sharing under international biodiversity law. It then critically assesses the potential for cross-fertilization with specific regard to: the sharing of scientific information and promotion of scientific cooperation, the transfer of technology, and the protection and valorization of traditional knowledge of indigenous peoples and local communities. While acknowledging that both the right to science and fair and equitable benefit-sharing are far from being fully understood or operationalized, the article argues that developments in international biodiversity law concerning the latter may provide insights into how a vague and optimistic concept can (and when it cannot) lead to tangible outcomes, rather than remaining merely rhetorical.",
keywords = "right to science, benefit-sharing, equity, international law, biodiversity, human rights, environmental law",
author = "Elisa Morgera",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "21",
doi = "10.3390/laws4040803",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "803--831",
journal = "Laws",
issn = "2075-471X",
number = "4",

}

Fair and equitable benefit-sharing at the cross-roads of the human right to science and international biodiversity law. / Morgera, Elisa.

In: Laws, Vol. 4, No. 4, 21.12.2015, p. 803-831.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fair and equitable benefit-sharing at the cross-roads of the human right to science and international biodiversity law

AU - Morgera, Elisa

PY - 2015/12/21

Y1 - 2015/12/21

N2 - As the debate about the need to clarify the content of the human right to science intensifies, this article assesses opportunities for opening a scholarly and policy dialogue on fair and equitable benefit-sharing between international human rights and biodiversity lawyers. To that end, the article contrasts the emerging conceptualizations of the right to science in the context of international cultural rights and of fair and equitable benefit-sharing under international biodiversity law. It then critically assesses the potential for cross-fertilization with specific regard to: the sharing of scientific information and promotion of scientific cooperation, the transfer of technology, and the protection and valorization of traditional knowledge of indigenous peoples and local communities. While acknowledging that both the right to science and fair and equitable benefit-sharing are far from being fully understood or operationalized, the article argues that developments in international biodiversity law concerning the latter may provide insights into how a vague and optimistic concept can (and when it cannot) lead to tangible outcomes, rather than remaining merely rhetorical.

AB - As the debate about the need to clarify the content of the human right to science intensifies, this article assesses opportunities for opening a scholarly and policy dialogue on fair and equitable benefit-sharing between international human rights and biodiversity lawyers. To that end, the article contrasts the emerging conceptualizations of the right to science in the context of international cultural rights and of fair and equitable benefit-sharing under international biodiversity law. It then critically assesses the potential for cross-fertilization with specific regard to: the sharing of scientific information and promotion of scientific cooperation, the transfer of technology, and the protection and valorization of traditional knowledge of indigenous peoples and local communities. While acknowledging that both the right to science and fair and equitable benefit-sharing are far from being fully understood or operationalized, the article argues that developments in international biodiversity law concerning the latter may provide insights into how a vague and optimistic concept can (and when it cannot) lead to tangible outcomes, rather than remaining merely rhetorical.

KW - right to science

KW - benefit-sharing

KW - equity

KW - international law

KW - biodiversity

KW - human rights

KW - environmental law

UR - http://www.mdpi.com/journal/laws

U2 - 10.3390/laws4040803

DO - 10.3390/laws4040803

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 803

EP - 831

JO - Laws

T2 - Laws

JF - Laws

SN - 2075-471X

IS - 4

ER -