Failure mode and effects analysis using a fuzzy-TOPSIS method: a case study of subsea control module

Athanasios J. Kolios, Anietie Umofia, Mahmood Shafiee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is one of the most common reliability engineering techniques used for identifying, evaluating and mitigating the engineering risks. In this paper, the potential failure modes of a subsea control module (SCM) are identified based on industry experts' opinions and experiences. This is followed by a comprehensive component based FMEA study using the risk-priority-number (RPN) where the most critical failure modes in the SCM are revealed. A fuzzy TOPSIS-based multiple criteria decision making methodology is then proposed to analyse and prioritise the most critical failure modes identified by the FMEA study. To this aim, a distinct ten-parameter criticality model is developed and, for the first time, is applied to evaluate the risks associated with SCM failures. The results indicate that the proposed fuzzy TOPSIS model can significantly improve the performance and applicability of the conventional FMEA technique in offshore oil and gas industry.

LanguageEnglish
Pages29-53
Number of pages25
JournalInternational Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2017

Fingerprint

Fuzzy TOPSIS
Failure modes and effects analysis
Module
Expert opinion
Oil and gas industry
Criticality
Multiple criteria decision making
Industry
Methodology

Keywords

  • failure mode and effects analysis
  • FMEA
  • MCDM
  • multiple-criteria decision making
  • risk assessment
  • SCM
  • subsea control module
  • TOPSIS

Cite this

@article{5a0e795a6b754b8d8afd76c2d1dc4041,
title = "Failure mode and effects analysis using a fuzzy-TOPSIS method: a case study of subsea control module",
abstract = "Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is one of the most common reliability engineering techniques used for identifying, evaluating and mitigating the engineering risks. In this paper, the potential failure modes of a subsea control module (SCM) are identified based on industry experts' opinions and experiences. This is followed by a comprehensive component based FMEA study using the risk-priority-number (RPN) where the most critical failure modes in the SCM are revealed. A fuzzy TOPSIS-based multiple criteria decision making methodology is then proposed to analyse and prioritise the most critical failure modes identified by the FMEA study. To this aim, a distinct ten-parameter criticality model is developed and, for the first time, is applied to evaluate the risks associated with SCM failures. The results indicate that the proposed fuzzy TOPSIS model can significantly improve the performance and applicability of the conventional FMEA technique in offshore oil and gas industry.",
keywords = "failure mode and effects analysis, FMEA, MCDM, multiple-criteria decision making, risk assessment, SCM, subsea control module, TOPSIS",
author = "Kolios, {Athanasios J.} and Anietie Umofia and Mahmood Shafiee",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1504/IJMCDM.2017.085154",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "29--53",
journal = "International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making",
issn = "2040-106X",
number = "1",

}

Failure mode and effects analysis using a fuzzy-TOPSIS method : a case study of subsea control module. / Kolios, Athanasios J.; Umofia, Anietie; Shafiee, Mahmood.

In: International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, Vol. 7, No. 1, 03.07.2017, p. 29-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Failure mode and effects analysis using a fuzzy-TOPSIS method

T2 - International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making

AU - Kolios, Athanasios J.

AU - Umofia, Anietie

AU - Shafiee, Mahmood

PY - 2017/7/3

Y1 - 2017/7/3

N2 - Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is one of the most common reliability engineering techniques used for identifying, evaluating and mitigating the engineering risks. In this paper, the potential failure modes of a subsea control module (SCM) are identified based on industry experts' opinions and experiences. This is followed by a comprehensive component based FMEA study using the risk-priority-number (RPN) where the most critical failure modes in the SCM are revealed. A fuzzy TOPSIS-based multiple criteria decision making methodology is then proposed to analyse and prioritise the most critical failure modes identified by the FMEA study. To this aim, a distinct ten-parameter criticality model is developed and, for the first time, is applied to evaluate the risks associated with SCM failures. The results indicate that the proposed fuzzy TOPSIS model can significantly improve the performance and applicability of the conventional FMEA technique in offshore oil and gas industry.

AB - Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is one of the most common reliability engineering techniques used for identifying, evaluating and mitigating the engineering risks. In this paper, the potential failure modes of a subsea control module (SCM) are identified based on industry experts' opinions and experiences. This is followed by a comprehensive component based FMEA study using the risk-priority-number (RPN) where the most critical failure modes in the SCM are revealed. A fuzzy TOPSIS-based multiple criteria decision making methodology is then proposed to analyse and prioritise the most critical failure modes identified by the FMEA study. To this aim, a distinct ten-parameter criticality model is developed and, for the first time, is applied to evaluate the risks associated with SCM failures. The results indicate that the proposed fuzzy TOPSIS model can significantly improve the performance and applicability of the conventional FMEA technique in offshore oil and gas industry.

KW - failure mode and effects analysis

KW - FMEA

KW - MCDM

KW - multiple-criteria decision making

KW - risk assessment

KW - SCM

KW - subsea control module

KW - TOPSIS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024903752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://inderscience.com/jhome.php?jcode=ijmcdm

UR - https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/12669

U2 - 10.1504/IJMCDM.2017.085154

DO - 10.1504/IJMCDM.2017.085154

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 29

EP - 53

JO - International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making

JF - International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making

SN - 2040-106X

IS - 1

ER -