Failed sterilisation and economic loss: Justice law and policy in Mcfarlane v Tayside health board

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Judicial arguments for and against awarding damages for mother's pain and suffering during pregnancy and costs of bringing up unwanted child resulting from failed vasectomy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)76-87
Number of pages12
JournalTottels Journal of Professional Negligence
Volume16
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Keywords

  • clinical negligence
  • damages
  • vasectomy
  • wrongful birth
  • Scotland

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Failed sterilisation and economic loss: Justice law and policy in Mcfarlane v Tayside health board'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this