External sources of clean technology: evidence from the Clean Development Mechanism

Patrick Bayer, Johannes Urpelainen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

New technology is fundamental to sustainable development. However, inventors from industrialized countries often refuse technology transfer because they worry about reverse-engineering. When can clean technology transfer succeed? We develop a formal model of the political economy of North-South technology transfer. According to the model, technology transfer is possible if (1) the technology in focus has limited global commercial potential or (2) the host developing country does not have the capacity to absorb new technologies for commercial use. If both conditions fail, inventors from industrialized countries worry about the adverse competitiveness effects of reverse-engineering, so technology transfer fails. Data analysis of technology transfer in 4,894 projects implemented under the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism during the 2004-2010 period provides evidence in support of the model.

LanguageEnglish
Pages81-109
Number of pages29
JournalReview of International Organizations
Volume8
Issue number1
Early online date9 Sep 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2013

Fingerprint

technology transfer
evidence
new technology
engineering
Kyoto Protocol
competitiveness
Clean technology
Technology transfer
Clean development mechanism
political economy
sustainable development
data analysis
developing country
Developed countries
Reverse engineering
Inventor

Keywords

  • Clean Development Mechanism
  • political economy
  • technology transfer

Cite this

@article{29d7f45d6a1a4513a9386dfb42f0142a,
title = "External sources of clean technology: evidence from the Clean Development Mechanism",
abstract = "New technology is fundamental to sustainable development. However, inventors from industrialized countries often refuse technology transfer because they worry about reverse-engineering. When can clean technology transfer succeed? We develop a formal model of the political economy of North-South technology transfer. According to the model, technology transfer is possible if (1) the technology in focus has limited global commercial potential or (2) the host developing country does not have the capacity to absorb new technologies for commercial use. If both conditions fail, inventors from industrialized countries worry about the adverse competitiveness effects of reverse-engineering, so technology transfer fails. Data analysis of technology transfer in 4,894 projects implemented under the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism during the 2004-2010 period provides evidence in support of the model.",
keywords = "Clean Development Mechanism, political economy, technology transfer",
author = "Patrick Bayer and Johannes Urpelainen",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1007/s11558-012-9150-0",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "81--109",
number = "1",

}

External sources of clean technology : evidence from the Clean Development Mechanism. / Bayer, Patrick; Urpelainen, Johannes.

Vol. 8, No. 1, 31.03.2013, p. 81-109.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - External sources of clean technology

T2 - evidence from the Clean Development Mechanism

AU - Bayer, Patrick

AU - Urpelainen, Johannes

PY - 2013/3/31

Y1 - 2013/3/31

N2 - New technology is fundamental to sustainable development. However, inventors from industrialized countries often refuse technology transfer because they worry about reverse-engineering. When can clean technology transfer succeed? We develop a formal model of the political economy of North-South technology transfer. According to the model, technology transfer is possible if (1) the technology in focus has limited global commercial potential or (2) the host developing country does not have the capacity to absorb new technologies for commercial use. If both conditions fail, inventors from industrialized countries worry about the adverse competitiveness effects of reverse-engineering, so technology transfer fails. Data analysis of technology transfer in 4,894 projects implemented under the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism during the 2004-2010 period provides evidence in support of the model.

AB - New technology is fundamental to sustainable development. However, inventors from industrialized countries often refuse technology transfer because they worry about reverse-engineering. When can clean technology transfer succeed? We develop a formal model of the political economy of North-South technology transfer. According to the model, technology transfer is possible if (1) the technology in focus has limited global commercial potential or (2) the host developing country does not have the capacity to absorb new technologies for commercial use. If both conditions fail, inventors from industrialized countries worry about the adverse competitiveness effects of reverse-engineering, so technology transfer fails. Data analysis of technology transfer in 4,894 projects implemented under the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism during the 2004-2010 period provides evidence in support of the model.

KW - Clean Development Mechanism

KW - political economy

KW - technology transfer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873724233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11558-012-9150-0

DO - 10.1007/s11558-012-9150-0

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 81

EP - 109

IS - 1

ER -