Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Exploring the lived experiences of women with metastatic breast cancer and their HRQoL questionnaire preferences: a qualitative study

  • Lærke K. Tolstrup*
  • , Marianne Vogsen
  • , Malene G. Hildebrandt
  • , Regina Wittchen Sørensen
  • , Roma Maguire
  • , Karin B. Dieperink
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Managing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is crucial due to the physical, emotional, and social burdens of disease and its treatments. This study examined the HRQoL of patients with MBC and compared the patients’ perspectives of two validated tools—the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast (FACT-B) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire QLQ-C30 with its breast cancer-specific module QLQ-BR42 (EORTC) to determine which is most suitable for assessing HRQoL in patients with MBC. Methods: A qualitative study design was used to explore patients’ HRQoL and their perspectives on the two questionnaires, FACT-B versus EORTC, focusing on what matters most to the patients. Individual interviews were conducted between September and December 2024 at the Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark. Thematic analysis was selected to extract and analyze data. Results: Fifteen women with MBC were included. Median age was 62 years (range 28–79), and the median duration of the interviews was 21 min (range 13–32 min). The analysis identified three main themes: (1) Living with metastatic disease, when incurable cancer is a life condition, (2) Design of the questionnaires, 3) Content of the questionnaires. Participants described impaired HRQoL, as they were hindered in living an everyday life, felt lonely at times, engaged in protective buffering, and lived in fear of the next scan. Overall, the participants found the design of the two questionnaires acceptable; neither was preferred over the other. However, regarding the content, the participants expressed a clear preference for FACT-B over the EORTC, primarily due to its greater relevance to their current situation, reflecting everyday life and need for support. Conclusions: Participants in this study reported impaired HRQoL, marked by disrupted daily life, loneliness, protective buffering, and scanxiety. They preferred the FACT-B over the EORTC questionnaire for measuring HRQoL because of its focus on personal and emotional aspects, which reflected their lived experiences. However, further research is warranted to validate these findings in more diverse populations in the metastatic breast cancer context.
Original languageEnglish
Article number32
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Jan 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • HRQoL
  • PROs
  • Metastatic breast cancer
  • EORTC QLQ-C30
  • Patient perspectives
  • Questionnaire
  • EORTC QLQ-BR42
  • FACT-B
  • Patient-reported outcomes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring the lived experiences of women with metastatic breast cancer and their HRQoL questionnaire preferences: a qualitative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this