Exploring perceptions and attitudes towards teaching and learning manual technical drawing in a digital age

Susan Valerie McLaren

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    26 Citations (Scopus)
    11 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This paper examines the place of manual technical drawing in the 21st century by discussing the perceived value and relevance of teaching school students how to draw using traditional instruments, in a world of computer aided drafting (CAD). Views were obtained through an e-survey, questionnaires and structured interviews. The sample groups represent professional CAD users (e.g. engineers, architects); university lecturers; Technology Education teachers and student teachers; and school students taking Scottish Qualification Authority (SQA) Graphic Communication courses. An analysis of these personal views and attitudes indicates some common values between the various groups canvassed of what instruction in traditional manual technical drafting contributes towards learning. Themes emerge such as problem solving, visualisation, accuracy, co-ordination, use of standard conventions, personal discipline and artistry. In contrast to the assumptions of Prensky's thesis (2001a&b) of digital natives, the study reported in this paper indicate that the school students apparently appreciate the experience of traditional drafting. In conclusion, the paper illustrates the perceived value of such learning in terms of transferable skills, personal achievement and enjoyment.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalInternational Journal of Technology and Design Education
    Volume1
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 27 Feb 2007

    Keywords

    • CAD
    • curriculum change
    • technical drafting
    • new technologies
    • learning
    • student attitude
    • curriculum

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring perceptions and attitudes towards teaching and learning manual technical drawing in a digital age'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this