Exploding the black box: personal computing, the notebook battery crisis, and postindustrial systems thinking

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Historians of science and technology have generally ignored the role of power sources in the development of consumer electronics. In this they have followed the predilections of historical actors. Research, develop- ment, and manufacturing of batteries has historically occurred at a social and intellectual distance from the research, development, and manufactur- ing of the devices they power. Nevertheless, power source technoscience should properly be understood as an allied yet estranged field of electronics. The separation between the fields has had important consequences for the design and manufacturing of mobile consumer electronics. This paper ex- plores these dynamics in the co-construction of notebook batteries and com- puters. In so doing, it challenges assumptions of historians and industrial engineers and planners about the nature of computer systems in particular and the development of technological systems. The co-construction of note- book computers and batteries, and the occasional catastrophic failure of their compatibility, challenges systems thinking more generally.
LanguageEnglish
Pages368-391
Number of pages24
JournalTechnology & Culture
Volume58
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Apr 2017

Fingerprint

Notebook
Systems Thinking
Manufacturing
Battery
Co-construction
Engineers
Historians of Science
Historian
Compatibility
Technological Systems
Technoscience

Keywords

  • notebook computers
  • batteries
  • postindustrial innovation

Cite this

@article{745194aa061e4e97a9507af61ea77020,
title = "Exploding the black box: personal computing, the notebook battery crisis, and postindustrial systems thinking",
abstract = "Historians of science and technology have generally ignored the role of power sources in the development of consumer electronics. In this they have followed the predilections of historical actors. Research, develop- ment, and manufacturing of batteries has historically occurred at a social and intellectual distance from the research, development, and manufactur- ing of the devices they power. Nevertheless, power source technoscience should properly be understood as an allied yet estranged field of electronics. The separation between the fields has had important consequences for the design and manufacturing of mobile consumer electronics. This paper ex- plores these dynamics in the co-construction of notebook batteries and com- puters. In so doing, it challenges assumptions of historians and industrial engineers and planners about the nature of computer systems in particular and the development of technological systems. The co-construction of note- book computers and batteries, and the occasional catastrophic failure of their compatibility, challenges systems thinking more generally.",
keywords = "notebook computers, batteries, postindustrial innovation",
author = "Eisler, {Matthew N.}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1353/tech.2017.0040",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "368--391",
number = "2",

}

Exploding the black box : personal computing, the notebook battery crisis, and postindustrial systems thinking. / Eisler, Matthew N.

Vol. 58, No. 2, 30.04.2017, p. 368-391.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploding the black box

T2 - personal computing, the notebook battery crisis, and postindustrial systems thinking

AU - Eisler, Matthew N.

PY - 2017/4/30

Y1 - 2017/4/30

N2 - Historians of science and technology have generally ignored the role of power sources in the development of consumer electronics. In this they have followed the predilections of historical actors. Research, develop- ment, and manufacturing of batteries has historically occurred at a social and intellectual distance from the research, development, and manufactur- ing of the devices they power. Nevertheless, power source technoscience should properly be understood as an allied yet estranged field of electronics. The separation between the fields has had important consequences for the design and manufacturing of mobile consumer electronics. This paper ex- plores these dynamics in the co-construction of notebook batteries and com- puters. In so doing, it challenges assumptions of historians and industrial engineers and planners about the nature of computer systems in particular and the development of technological systems. The co-construction of note- book computers and batteries, and the occasional catastrophic failure of their compatibility, challenges systems thinking more generally.

AB - Historians of science and technology have generally ignored the role of power sources in the development of consumer electronics. In this they have followed the predilections of historical actors. Research, develop- ment, and manufacturing of batteries has historically occurred at a social and intellectual distance from the research, development, and manufactur- ing of the devices they power. Nevertheless, power source technoscience should properly be understood as an allied yet estranged field of electronics. The separation between the fields has had important consequences for the design and manufacturing of mobile consumer electronics. This paper ex- plores these dynamics in the co-construction of notebook batteries and com- puters. In so doing, it challenges assumptions of historians and industrial engineers and planners about the nature of computer systems in particular and the development of technological systems. The co-construction of note- book computers and batteries, and the occasional catastrophic failure of their compatibility, challenges systems thinking more generally.

KW - notebook computers

KW - batteries

KW - postindustrial innovation

UR - https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/194

U2 - 10.1353/tech.2017.0040

DO - 10.1353/tech.2017.0040

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 368

EP - 391

IS - 2

ER -